How Does Experience Shape Perspective?

Improved Essays
Different opinions are almost as common as ants or grass blades. They’re everywhere, and show up in many different topics. Even when given the same information or base knowledge, people can form different opinions. People can have completely different ideas about what a painting represents, although they are seeing the same painting. This is due, in part, to the different perspectives that people view the world with. It also has to do with the emotional response that art and something like ethical choices elicit in a person. It’s not going to be the same for everyone, because not everyone has the same viewpoint. So what shapes perspective? In many and most ways, perspective about different things is based off of the experiences people go through. So, looking at the same painting, two art critics can have completely opposing opinions, largely due to perspective, which is largely based on experience. To what extent does experience shape the perspective that a person has about different topics …show more content…
Moral codes on a national scale are always going to be vague and inclusive, as well as exclusive. Usually, it’s seemed to be ethically wrong to murder someone. However, the ancient Aztecs used to perform human sacrifices. To us in modern times, this is such a foreign concept that it seems barbaric but the Aztecs didn’t even see it as murder at all. Murder as a bad thing did exist in their ancient society but human sacrifice was a necessary component to their perceived happiness and wellbeing, therefore they didn’t believe that it was a bad thing. A more recent example of different perspectives: slaves. Up until recently, it was deemed ethically okay by multitudes of people to own slaves, but now that sort of thing would unheard of. Different perspectives are all that matters. Location, nurture and environment affect thing like an ethical code, leading to many variables in the development of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Their opinions can be based on one certain point e.g. Hitler. “How could someone as dumb as that run a country?’ asked Mark.” Mark to his mum. The slight use of caricature in this quote really stresses Mark’s opinion on Hitler as he thinks that Hitler is too dumb to run Germany. “How could she want someone like that to love her?…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Murder And Lying Analysis

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Before Rachels stated his stand regarding the cultural judgment of the “excision” he stated that we, all of the cultures should have at least some of our values or moral codes that each culture has in common. Rachels gives the example of Murder and lying to make his point that we all have some moral codes or virtues that are universal by stating “…there are some moral rules that all societies must have in common, because those rules are necessary for society to exist. The rules against lying and murder are two examples. And in fact, we do find these rules in force in all viable cultures. Cultures may differ in what they regard as legitimate exceptions to the rules, but this disagreement exists against a background of agreement on the larger…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics means doing the right action, based off virtue ethics. To support this definition the novella excerpt “Lather And Nothing Else”, the article “Who Will Save The Savior Siblings”, and the song “Independence Day” all demonstrate virtuous ethics. Initially, killing is wrong because virtuously killing is not temperament. Hernando Tellez persuades revolutionists to not go against his or her morals in the novella excerpt “Lather and Nothing Else,”.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An individual views the world through a set of goggles crafted by their culture. Each choice made by one is dictated by their cultural background and how it has influenced them. This includes how one reacts to and treat others. For instance, a worldview can determine one's place in life in a social hierarchy, and the quality of life they deserve, and the expectations that are held for them in a family. Expectations set by one's family is something that is determined with a culture playing a large role in the making of them.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From the family unit to the national state, each societal group is held accountable by the laws of their own creation. Whether through coercion or incentive, each member of the group agrees to abide by these laws. Yet were do these laws arise from? The answer is morals. Though some well-meaning idealists might wish for laws based on logic, it has been historically shown that many societies base their laws on a collective sense of morality.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Norm Breeching Every culture, every family and every person has their own values and beliefs that they abide to. Every household lives by a different set of ideals, these can be influenced by religion, the environment they live in and also what kind of government they follow. However the factor that everyone has different interpretations of are norms. Norms are something that is usual or standard, they are like actions or words we say on a daily bases that are normal and not unusual.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Trying to decide whether I am an objectivist or a relativist was a tough decision. Do I think people follow the same set or ethical codes and morals? Or do I believe that people’s morals and ethical codes depend on the individual person. After thinking about the both of those, I have decided that I am a combination of both an objectivist and a relativist, but I lean a little more towards the relativist side. A relativist is someone who has their own morals and ethics based on how they feel.…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Perhaps I am breaking the rules of this forum, by sharing a story which is not technically a first hand account of my own direct experiences. One thing I am certain of is that I am breaking the laws of doctor/patient confidentiality by sharing this secondary story at all-- which was relayed to me personally in an interview situation with one of my patients. My name is Doctor Simon Kearns. I am a doctor of psychology at Bourkeley institution for mental health in Hexton, Australia.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Two Cultures of Punishment by Joshua Kleinfield (2016), the Kleinfield compares how American and European nations differ in moral visions when inflicting punishment upon the offender. In America, crimes that are committed are viewed as morally wrong, not just to the victim, but to the entire society . In contrast, the legal system in Europe believes that the crime itself is separate from the offender in which that all human beings are essentially good. Furthermore, Kleinfield suggests that hard treatment and control are both significant in terms of how punishment is defined and function. Kleinfield, then, explains how human beings decides on the foundations of rights when they choose to punish.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social Norms In Canada

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Substantive criminal law arises from and defines the basic values by which members of society are able to live together with mutual respect. These are rules by which citizens determine what is right and wrong, what conduct is tolerated and what behaviour is condemned by the larger community.” (Davison, 2011). The Criminal Code of Canada as well as the Charter of Rights and Freedom reflects the social norms and the values upheld by the members of the Canadian society. This essay will be examining the different social factors that influence the creation and the termination of Canadian criminal law.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Well, that is their opinion.” “Everyone has different morals.” “A person’s values may be different from yours.” These are common platitudes many people use to explain why some people or cultures uphold certain values while downplaying others. If this question of whether or not all ethics are relative, it is obvious that all ethics are not relative.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    How to deal with moral differences varies on the perspective at hand. Dealing with the clash that has surfaced between the western value of freedom of the press and the sacredness of the Muslim religion is a prominent issue currently in society. An ethical relativist does not believe in a universal moral truth, but instead that the morals at hand, revolve around the culture, especially the specific “time and place”. Whereas a soft universalist believes in the idea of a few universal moral truths existing. In short, the main goal of soft universalism is to “seek common ground beneath the variety of opinions and mores” (Rosenstand, 2013, p.122-123).…

    • 1793 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    • Differences in perception and viewpoint. There can be barriers when communicating in different perception and viewpoint, for example when working on a project as in a group everyone has different viewpoint about the project and can be very difficult to work when having to have many disagreements. If a person in the group has an idea for the project and one person does not agree with the idea that the person has, this means that they will less likely to get along with each other and the group work might not work. Another reason why there might be barriers when communicating in different perception and viewpoint is that when communicating with a person from another country, the communication between them and you they might find very unusual and for some reason if they do not understand what you are trying to say then you…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Inevitable Human Nature

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Most people would agree that human nature is valid to the extent that people are effected by physical attributes and genetics. The major debate is whether human nature exists beyond those elements of our lives. I believe in a human nature that is not fixed but adaptable; not only would we have had to evolve to our current condition, but we also must be able to evolve from it. While the genetic differences between chimpanzees and human beings are very small, their effects are drastic and extremely significant. In the cases of feral children and extreme cultural differences, it is difficult to see a universal condition of humanity.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality is the principle between good and evil ,it tells what's right and what's wrong . Morality is based on certain decisions we make in life. So Question is : what is the essence of Morality? To many people Morality is a different meaning to everybody many.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays