The Importance Of Privacy In George Orwell's 1984

Improved Essays
Privacy and Protection
In George Orwell’s 1984, Big Brother exploits surveillance to spy on everything from people’s daily actions to the thoughts in their mind’s privacy (Orwell). This book has left a horrifying image to its readers with the idea of the invasion of privacy through manipulation and misuse of surveillance. As extreme as that sounds, this could be the near future of Americans if surveillance continues to grow. Due to the disclosures of Edward Snowden on the flaws of surveillance, the government must implement changes on the NSA Domestic Surveillance Programs to guarantee privacy, safety, and the fair use of taxes in America.
Many different intelligence agencies, private and government-run, serve to keep America safe. Some of
…show more content…
US Senator Richard Burr says, “We are on the floor today talking about taking away some of the tools that have been effective in helping us thwart attacks. It is the wrong debate to have” (“Pros and Cons”). Security and stability in life come with the appropriate protections and preparations. Allowing surveillance to provide security to the country will save people from having to worry about major terrorist attacks, such as 9/11, from happening again. Also, technology is advancing in every part of the world, so it would be a waste not to make use of the resources under America’s possession, especially when every other country could be using it against American citizens. Surveillance facilitates the process of tracking criminals both locally and internationally. Since everyone has the potential to become a criminal, surveillance is essential to forestall possible …show more content…
In fact, America’s domestic surveillance gives only a glimpse of illegal monitoring happening across the globe. Surveillance is much harsher on Middle Easterners who have a history of terrorism. Nevertheless, it is common knowledge that the actions of one person or people group of a country do not determine the characteristics of the population of that country as a whole. If so, why is it that the blameless citizens of the country must surrender their rights? Again, human rights apply to everyone regardless of anything simply because they are human.
The government also fails the trust factor with its lies. In “The Domestic Surveillance Lie,” Eddlem tells how the government misrepresented the issues about the collection and misuse of personal data (Eddlem). The recurring denial and acknowledgment of the truth creates nihilism and doubt among citizens. If the government keeps trying to hide things, suspicion will arise in the state-citizen relationship. The government must make a conscious change to prevent themselves from getting carried away with the power and authority that was given to them by the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Governments are most likely to look out for themselves and their special interests when they are challenged by the people, as proven in the election for President of the United States in 2016. The fact of the matter is that people want to be able to trust their government, and a government wants to be able to trust its people. When trust is lost on either side, a country is more apt to become corrupt and try to save itself before the wall of excessive pride and its ramifications come tumbling down. The bridge of trust must be repaired from both ends. The government certainly does not help any situation regarding trust when spying on citizens is part of their mantra.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The law also breached the Fourth Amendment, which should protect people from being search and seizure. It raised controversial issues, such as violating the Constitution and agents could monitor a terrorist even if they haven’t found evidence he belongs to a foreign terrorist organization. As a result, it had a tremendous impact on our social lives and Patriot Act gave the FBI to access personal information. The government had the authority of surveillance, which allowed them to see on particular person’s communications and suspect houses. US senator Edward Snowden showed the government information about the agency was using the law to justify the bulk collection of data about millions of phone calls.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article, “Need for National Security Threatens Citizens’ Privacy”, the author stated, “Our personal privacy is coming increasingly under threat, as our lives are constantly monitored without our knowledge” (O’Cleirigh). The author ironically stated that our personal privacy is under threat, not our lives. It is true because as the government focus on the national security by spying on citizens, people start to feel insecure toward their own the government. Personal privacy is very important for each individual, so the government should respect that. They cannot justify their reason as “for the national security” to destroy that individual’s personal privacy.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    4th Amendment Essay

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This must not continue because it violates America’s law saying that no citizen should be subjected to random searches. Andrew Grosso argues that the fact that the EEA now does wiretapping proves to be a violation of civil liberties and says that “wirestaps are one of the most intrusive of all investigative techniques” (Espionage and Intelligence Gathering 134). Wiretapping does not only violate the First Amendment but the Fourth Amendment as well. With the EAA listening and tracking down all of our messages and phone calls, the citizens of America are subjected to unreasonable searches and anything they say might be taken as threats against the government and United States. The Fourth Amendment should be more enforced when it comes to…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Even though they want to attempt to prevent future terrorist attacks, opening up a backdoor into everybody’s phone will not work. Terrorist attacks aren’t predictable and having the privileges to obtain any information, the government will have the most powerfulest weapon on their side. If the courts did provide the FBI their wish, imagine them being able to observe anybody information without them knowing. It’s almost as inviting the whole government into your house with all of your secrets on the table for them to pick and choose which to exploit to the…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Government Surveillance

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Peoples, meaning people around the globe, will be deprived of privacy and fundamental rights. From the sanitary surveillance in the1900s ‘til now, the government has been struggling to strike a balance drawing a righteous line between public interest and privacy. Though reaching consensus among stakeholders is arduous, transparent and an open discussion should still remain and be valued. Additionally, the government has been claiming that they ‘not-wittingly’ infringe citizens’ privacy to protect from potential threat eg terrorism. However, I beg to…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Spying on Democracy, the Department of Homeland Security was created as a response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. As a result, this gave FBI agents authorization to install surveillance devices, access private databases, and search and monitor chat rooms, bulletin boards, and websites. Because of this, New York Republican representative, Peter King, exploited public fears of terrorism and “praised surveillance cameras as a way to keep Americans safe from ‘terrorists who are constantly trying to kill us’” (Boghosian 25). By insisting that mass surveillance makes us safer, King was able to convince 96 percent of the U.S population to agree upon this claim according to the 2009 Harris Poll survey. However, many citizens did not realize that they also allowed the government to potentially conduct mass surveillance for other reasons the public may not want.…

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Control In America

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Many Americans, although their hearts are in the right place, are completely unaware of the dangers we will be facing if gun control is allowed to be put into effect. Taking away the right to keep and bear arms would be significantly more deadly for the American population. It would increase crime rather than reducing it, criminals would become…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Privacy is so important to humans that people will go to great lengths like spend tons of money on lawsuits if their privacy was invaded. Clearly, privacy is very important to us, which makes this matter of privacy theft extremely serious. North American governments even promote the basic need for privacy to every North American yet they are only lying to our faces to gain the power they need and to keep us citizens powerless in the sense that they stole our privacy from us but we have no power to do the same to them. Don’t you see how messed up this situation is? Can’t you see how vulnerable we are as North Americans?…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Edward Snowden Violations

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I can imagine that people would not want to help you if you don’t trust them and feel the need to spy on them. The debate of whether what Edward Snowden did was the right or wrong thing also seems kind of up in the air. Obviously releasing the information that he did got the U.S. government into quite a bit of trouble with other countries and angered many of its own citizens, but are the government’s actions of disregarding the rights of the people justified if it is for the sake of protecting the country. Personally, I don’t think it is with the extent that government has surveillance on everything and how much data they are actually keeping. It is also pretty unethical in the way that they use it to negatively impact innocent people’s lives if the movie accurately portrayed the targeting of the one banker from the middle east and his daughter.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays