The Importance Of Objectivity In Philosophy

Decent Essays
Objectivism would argue that there are common characteristics of the truth that make it objectively true. Objectivism is the view that right or wrong is not dependent on what someone interprets as right or wrong but rather that there are collective morals facts that do not depend on what any individual thinks. Objectivity may not consider the circumstances of the situation that make something true vs. untrue. What is true to you may not be true for me. Say for example we both watched a presidential debate and I said Hilary Clinton clearly won the debate, but you insisted that Donald Trump did the same thing. Well I am evaluating the debate based upon my own inner beliefs, morals, ideologies, and biases to arrive at my interpretation of …show more content…
The same can be said of reality. Once you realize that you have the power of distortion, you can distort your thinking to either positive or negative. When you embody one of those two distortion fields you will then start to realize the world in an entirely new fashion. You may interpret something as positive that you never saw this way before because you have adopted a positive way of thinking. You will start to find that adopting a positive mind set, will lead you to attracting positive things into your life (laws of attraction). This can affect how you interpret the truth of things, if your ability to interpret the world can be distorted in this fashion then there is at least a minimal component of relativism in truth. Perceptivism would additionally say that dreaming could be just as real depending on one’s perception because of the time distortion that takes place inside of dreams. Perceptivism would further suggest that there are two existences within human existence, but the other will get disregarded as non-significant. Perceptivism would break human existence into two common separate perceptions of reality; conscious reality and unconscious reality. Conscious reality (awakened state) is an existence in which people inhabit a consistent set of metaphysical properties within this reality and is considered to be tangible. Unconscious reality (dream state) is an existence in which the metaphysical properties are in flux and aren’t measurable. Conscious reality picks up and leaves off at the same starting point every time perception is channeled through this existence. Whereas unconscious reality is randomized in its starting and ending point. Conscious reality has measurable properties and time. You will be able to use time as a measuring stick

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Final Paper Assignment My purpose in this essay is to explain why I believe that morality is objective versus moral relativism, which ethical theory do I ratify and the reasons behind why I do, and express how I would respond to a stranger’s objection to that specific ethical theory. Theory of Morality, also known as theory of the right, is concerned with identifying fundamental moral norms, rules, or principles in which actions are evaluated and may be deemed as right or wrong. In other words, this is explaining what you ought or ought not to do. Moral relativism is to say that there are no moral truths.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If individuals had no moral values, everyone would be running around without a care in the world and solely worried about themselves. There would be no awareness for anybody or anything so we would turn into selfish human beings. Ethical relativism is “the doctrine that the moral rightness and wrongness of actions vary from society to society and that there are no absolute universal moral standards binding on all men at all times” (Pojman, 14). There are some moral values worldwide that are just adopted overtime and for that I will support Louis Pojman and what he states about ethical relativism being an incoherent theory, how it is much bigger than just individuals or even societies. I strive to hit on conventionalism and subjectivism, which have their up sides but ultimately diminish Pojman’s argument on ethical relativism.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In ‘The Subjectivity of Values’, J L Mackie examines error theory and objective morality vs non-cognitivism. Mackie’s report represents moral scepticism using moral error theory. By taking an error theory approach, Mackie confronts morality similarly to the manner in which an atheist confronts religion. Moral error theory could be broken down to a version of the Justified True Belief outline as follows: Moral claims are universally false There is reason to believe that moral claims are universally false There is no justification for believing any deniable claim…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural and Subjective Relativism is that are no independent truths, all truths are relevant. They might be subjective; however, it’s relative. Relativism tries to show us that moral beliefs are true for us, but might not necessarily be true to another party. Cultural and Subjective Relativism is a form of moral relativism, it conveys that moral truth should be judges by the moral code of the relevance to society and culture. Cultural and Subjective Relativist like to think that society has different moral codes and the moral codes should not be compared because there is no moral measure…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I believe that I am a moral objectivism. I believe that just because of someones cultures or beliefs it does not make it okay to be held to different standards. People tend to use their culture as an excuse to do certain things. Some cultures believe that cows are very sacred. Some people in go above and beyond to protect the cows and if someone is to harm those animals they can deal with very severe consequence.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Controversy stirs in the melting pot. In the excerpts from “On Crime and Punishment” and “Racism,” novelist Ayn Rand expresses her philosophical belief regarding society. Ayn Rand’s philosophical belief is Objectivism, which encompasses the theory of individualism and discredits the theory of collectivism. Describing the virtues of individualism as well as the disadvantages of collectivism including racism, Ayn Rand sufficiently explains her philosophical perspective. Unlike collectivism, Objectivism is an extremely simple concept that allows no room for contradictions.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These are my thoughts on the debate. Now I wonder if my debate could be considered valid in anyone’s personal…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Novick: His Noble Dream of Defining the “Objectivity Question” Among Historians A plaguing question for modern historians, distancing oneself from the source material and becoming “objective” in a subjective world has been a struggle for decades now. While many historians, try as they might, attempt to provide a well-rounded, even-handed account of history through their eyes albeit in the proper historical context, those such as Peter Novick believe many of their efforts to have been in vain. Historian Peter Novick tackles the question of objectivity in his book, That Noble Dream: the “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession, by providing a rather lengthy, somewhat confusing, and exasperated attempt to define objectivity…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral realism or also known as ethical realism is an idea that there are moral facts in a statement and that something can be true or false based on those…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    And because of this, there is no definite way to distinguish between each of the perceptions. Many other philosophers have studied this premise, including John Locke and Thomas Hobbes. Thomas Hobbes believes that the biggest key to distinguishing a dream from waking consciousness is the “absurdity”. “An absence of absurdity in waking life”, describes how one may realize a perception is a dream through a perception that is extremely abnormal, where he or she is positive that is not occurring in real life (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy). For example, if one dreamt of talking to and spending time with a dead relative, he/she knows that is impossible, or in Hobbes’ mind, is “absurd” and therefore distinguishing the difference between dreaming and being awake.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism vs. Objectivism There are two different theories dealing with morality, what is right or wrong, and what is good or bad. The theories discussed will be, ethical relativism and ethical objectivism. Ethical relativism is defined as having no absolute stance on a position; there is no right or wrong. Ethical objectivism which claims that some moral rules really are correct. What would it mean for ethics if there were no absolutes?…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For example, a dark shadow at night might be perceived as one thing, but when one sees that same thing in the light, then one may realize their senses were mislead because it is something completely different than originally thought. Then, comes the idea of the dream. When one is dreaming, there is no possible form of reality. The images and ideas in the mind of one might be realistic. Still, appearance and reality contradict one another and those ideas cannot be taken for granted.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In class and in The Elements of Moral Philosophy by James & Stuart Rachels, I learned about the Minimum Conception of Morality (MCM). There are two key elements which make up the Minimum Conception of Morality. The first part states the moral judgments must always have good reasons for the decision. This often is confused with what they feel and not actually facts. The second part is that morality must always be impartial, and take all stakeholders into consideration without being bias.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's View Of Relativism

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Traditional Understanding Although a key issue in contemporary times, relativism dates back to the beginnings of Western philosophy. As Baghramian (2015) notes, the earliest documented source on relativism can be traced back to Plato’s account of the Sophist Philosopher Protagoras of Abdera (490-420BC) who, during a period of increased contact between people of different cultures in ancient Athens, claimed that “Man is the measure of all things; of the things that are, that they are; and of the things that are not, that they are not” (p. 233). While it is unclear whether Protagoras’s comment was necessarily relativist in the way that relativism is used to attack his ideas today (Marc & Curd, 2000), Plato interpreted Protagoras as meaning…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction There are different views about the objectivity and subjectivity in history. It has been remained one of the major and important concept in history or historical research and there is always being a conflict among the philosophers and the historians since before few decades. Such type of discussion and variance of opinions lead to the division between the traditional historians and the post-modernist historians. Both subjectivity and objectivity are the two component of history or ideas of historical research which deal with the validity of the historical knowledge. That is to how much extent the historical knowledge or reconstruction of any historical event can be framed as a valid and accurate knowledge.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays