Introduction
There are different views about the objectivity and subjectivity in history. It has been remained one of the major and important concept in history or historical research and there is always being a conflict among the philosophers and the historians since before few decades. Such type of discussion and variance of opinions lead to the division between the traditional historians and the post-modernist historians. Both subjectivity and objectivity are the two component of history or ideas of historical research which deal with the validity of the historical knowledge. That is to how much extent the historical knowledge or reconstruction of any historical event can be framed as a valid and accurate knowledge. This essay aims to put a short introduction about the objectivity and subjectivity in history. Furthermore, it also elaborates the post-modernists and the traditional historians’ views and also discusses about the factors that effect on the subjectivity in history. However, the main objective of this essay is to prove that history or the historical research is partially objective and partly subjective.
What is Objectivity and Subjectivity
Objectivity and subjectivity are one of the significant concepts of …show more content…
First of all due to the world view of a historian it is impossible to study an event objectively. It is due to that everyone has its own views about the world. Similarly the intellectual inclination or scholarly inclination and prevalent circumstances or presentism in history also affect the influences of the objectivity in history. Presentism in history means to evaluate the past events in present circumstances. The objectivity can also be affect in the sense of biases. The biases may be political, cultural, racial, religious or ethically. Due to above all the factors the post modernist historian considered that the objectivity is not attainable and is a
There are different views about the objectivity and subjectivity in history. It has been remained one of the major and important concept in history or historical research and there is always being a conflict among the philosophers and the historians since before few decades. Such type of discussion and variance of opinions lead to the division between the traditional historians and the post-modernist historians. Both subjectivity and objectivity are the two component of history or ideas of historical research which deal with the validity of the historical knowledge. That is to how much extent the historical knowledge or reconstruction of any historical event can be framed as a valid and accurate knowledge. This essay aims to put a short introduction about the objectivity and subjectivity in history. Furthermore, it also elaborates the post-modernists and the traditional historians’ views and also discusses about the factors that effect on the subjectivity in history. However, the main objective of this essay is to prove that history or the historical research is partially objective and partly subjective.
What is Objectivity and Subjectivity
Objectivity and subjectivity are one of the significant concepts of …show more content…
First of all due to the world view of a historian it is impossible to study an event objectively. It is due to that everyone has its own views about the world. Similarly the intellectual inclination or scholarly inclination and prevalent circumstances or presentism in history also affect the influences of the objectivity in history. Presentism in history means to evaluate the past events in present circumstances. The objectivity can also be affect in the sense of biases. The biases may be political, cultural, racial, religious or ethically. Due to above all the factors the post modernist historian considered that the objectivity is not attainable and is a