Compare And Contrast Patch Adams And Epicurus

Superior Essays
Epicurus believes that happiness is the ultimate goal in life. Dr. Hunter “Patch” Adams, played by Robin Williams in Patch Adams, a film about a medical student who suffers from depression, also shares that idea. Although differing in reasons, the philosophies of Dr. Patch Adams ad Epicurus coincide: happiness is obtained through simple pleasures, a life of wisdom is acquired through nonconformity, and death should not be feared. According to both Epicurus and Patch, a life filled with content is sought through the harmony of the body and the world, as well as appreciating the small delights of life. In “Letter to Menoeceus”, Epicurus advises his audience to “[secure] health of body and tranquility of mind, seeing that this is the sum …show more content…
However, in the movie Patch Adams, Dr. Hunter Patch believes that the greatest good in life is specifically laughter and being a supportive friend in times of need. His greatest pleasure is knowing that he made someone’s day or life better, simply by making that person laugh, and that is all he needs to live a happy life. Likewise, Dr. Adams and Epicurus also trust that a life abundant with wisdom can only be obtained through nonconformity. In the beginning of the film, Dr. Patch is a self-admitted suicidal man in a mental hospital. While there, he meets another patient by the name of Arthur Mendelson, known as the patient who goes berserk when he holds up four fingers and asks other patients, “How many do you see?”, and people respond with the number four. He starts shouting, “You are all crazy, it is not four!” One night, Patch visits Arthur and Arthur asks him how many fingers he sees, and Patch responds with the usual answer of the number four. To that, Arthur tells him, “No, no! Look beyond the fingers! Now tell me how many you see.” To that, Patch answers with the number eight. Delighted, Arthur advises him, “You’re focusing on the problem. If you focus on the problem, you can’t see the …show more content…
During his medical trial, he asks the Dean, “What’s wrong with death sir? What are we so mortally afraid of? Why can’t we treat death with a certain amount of humanity and dignity, and decency, and God forbid, maybe even humor. Death is not the enemy gentleman.” Just like Epicurus, he does not comprehend why people are so afraid of dying and even death itself. There is simply nothing to be afraid of, which is the idea that Epicurus shares. Epicurus further explains and elaborates on death in his article. He states that “death is nothing to us” (Epicurus 126). He thinks “foolish…is the man who says that he fears death, not because it will pain when it comes, but because it pains in the prospect” (126), and that death is “the most awful of evils” (127). He believes the dead will not be pained when their life ceases, therefore, there is no need to be afraid. In conclusion, our collation of Dr. Patch Adams’s and Epicurus’s standpoint of the good life is quite similar, but with different supporting evidence. While Epicurus’s views general, Dr. Adams’s are specific. In the eyes of both, the good life is full of little infinities, wisdom and courage. Their word of advice is to be pleased with less, appreciate the people and the world around you, and see the world in a different perspective. Then, and only then, will you be truly

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Summary of Adam Grant Adam Grant’s article, “Does Trying to Be Happy Make Us Unhappy,” discusses finding happiness. Grant’s thesis indicates that, trying to be happy will not make us happy. He evaluates an individual case by applying different happiness related theories. At the beginning, Adam Grant points out that searching out for happiness is not a correct way of persuading happiness.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the you tube clip, the narrator, Alain de Botton, described that the “good life” was the result of friendship, freedom, and diminishing one’s worries. He described a satisfied life was a basic and simple way of life. There were no commitments desiring fabulous or erotic customs or materialistic items which would suggest that an individual is doing rather well in with oneself or their environment. In Epicurus’ world the cluster of society’s greed could not fulfil an individual’s endearment, but the basic human instincts would yield a fortitude or collection of fulfilment or satisfaction. The body only needs what is necessary, or the bare essentials, to work itself through the attainment for having a satisfying life.…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life isn't meant to be easy, it is meant to be lived. Sometimes good and other times rough. But with every up and down, you learn lessons that make you stronger. Chris Gardner from the film ‘The Pursuit Of Happiness’ directed by Mucciano and, Billy Blunkett from ‘The Simple Gift’ written by Herrick, they both deal with similar struggles and up’s and down’s. But the both characters become stronger with the pain, which they both face in their life.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fear In Maacandra's Life

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages

    People are scared about death because nobody in the world knows when will it come and what will be happened after it. They have different opinions on death and these can be changed after exploring different life experiences. Some of them try to escape death by various ways because of fear, while…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I believe that both Socrates and Lucretius have good arguments on how to be afraid of death. They have some similarities, but they have many contradictories within each of each other 's arguments. The thought in different ways are not from similar time periods. Although, both did agree on that death is a part of life and once you’re gone, you are gone and feel no…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To Aristotle, character is defined by what outcomes or results use desire, the different types of actions we are enjoined to or prohibited from taking, and the habits we may be advised to cultivate within ourselves. For instance, we may feel obligated to pursue a life of duty through some sort of service, or we may feel concern for the public. The Greek ethical proposes, “What is good for man?”. Aristotle believes that ‘eudaimonia’, or happiness, is good for man.…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This will effectively preclude the possibility of an afterlife, thus greatly narrowing this essay in scope. Epicurus’ main argument for why death is not bad for the person who dies, often referred to as the “no subject of harm” argument , is contained in his Letter to Menoeceus (341-270). His position is relatively well-known and can be formulated briefly as follows: if something harms a person P, there must exist a subject who is harmed, a clear…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This statement directly follows the quote of Epicurus's “Letter to Menoeceus” in which Epicurus states how death does not exist for us, the living, and therefore we should concern ourselves with it. As Silverstein puts it, “... it is one thing simply to deny that A's death is an evil for A; it is quite another to imply, as does the Epicurean view (for the "no subject" difficulty holds across the board), that A's death cannot intelligibly be ascribed any A-relative value, positive, negative, or neutral” (Sec. 1, Par. 11). He goes on to state that the Epicurean view “... now seems clearly to be an unhappy last resort, if not flatly intolerable” (Sec. 1, Par. 12). It ought to be to clear to a reader of Silverstein's that the intuitive-based, common-sense concerns not be so readily overlooked and dismissed. As he brings together his argument for the VCF and Four-Dimensionality, Silverstein constructs a framework of understanding that make the intuitive concern for one's own death a reasonable and valid one.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believes that death annihilates identity and identity ends when the body ends. Human are necessarily mortal; even if they’re put back together after death, it would not be the same because the only thing that makes an individual themselves is the unity of the identity and body. When the connection of these two break, there is no putting them back together. Epicurus has the notion that “good and bad consists of sense-experience” (164). Death is the annihilation of those experiences.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Epicurus

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    "Thanks be to blessed Nature because she has made what is necessary easy to supply, and what is not easy unnecessary... The right understanding of these facts enables us to refer all choice and avoidance to the health of the body and the soul's freedom from disturbance, since this is the aim of the life of blessedness." Epicurus believed in a simplistic way of life. He believed that happiness is not found in living a luxurious, extravagant life, instead it can be found in living a simpler life with fulfillment of basic needs, friends and family. As he said in the above quote “thanks to nature because she has made what is necessary easy to supply and what is not easy unnecessary…”…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethical theories of both Aristotle and Epictetus, laid out in their books the Nicomachean Ethics and the Enchiridion, respectively, offer humanity insight into the most effective ways to achieve happiness and to exhibit virtue. Aristotle’s approach to happiness is that it must be looked at as the end to a means not as a means to an end. He feels that happiness should be viewed as the highest good within life. Although Epictetus agrees that happiness is the highest attainable good, he believes that the source of humanity’s misery is people’s inability to differentiate between what they can control and what they cannot. While both philosopher’s theories emphasize the importance of happiness and virtue in a person’s life, Epictetus’ view…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates states in the Apology, “To fear death … is no other than to think oneself wise when one is not, to think one knows what one does not know” (29a). Fearing death is a form of ignorance. Socrates demonstrates he is not afraid of death because he does not have all the information to base his opinion of death. In addition, Socrates does not fear death because he is excited for the fact that he may continue his search for truth by examining the souls of the dead. Death may be a blessing in disguise or a curse.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The fact that nobody knows what lies ahead after death, a person cannot involve rationale in the argument of fearing death without coming out as arrogant. When Socrates lost the trial he remains rebellious in the sentencing period to result in his death sentence and he had to deal with the analogy of mortality (Plato et al 2003). He did not view death as an evil thing. As such, the…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also said that death couldn’t be good or bad because those feelings only comes through conscious and real thoughts. This is the main reason I do not agree with Epicures. I believe that death is bad for us because of the fact that we cannot experience…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How does one achieve a status of pure happiness? Is it having all the money in the world to spend? Is it being able to spend time with friends, family, and loved ones? Is it winning a championship title game? There is no one true answer that could possibly answer this ideal question.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays