1. What Is The Difference Between Civil Liberty And Civil Right?

Good Essays
1. The First Amendment is related to pornography and obscenity, because of people 's opinions on whether or not pornography is a form of expression or a form of denigration. If pornography is a freedom of expression, then pornography is protected under the First Amendment, however, if pornography is a form of denigration then pornography is not protected under the First Amendment. Obscenity as ruled by the Supreme Court is not protected under the First Amendment, because it is believed obscenity is a form of denigration. The 3 rules set by Chief Justice Warren Burger are: First, if a person would have lustful thoughts? This rule was set so the art would not be considered obscene. Second, does it demonstrate sexual content as offensive? …show more content…
Civil liberties are fundamental human rights that the government cannot control and provides people protection from the government. On the other hand, civil rights are obligations required by civil society for civil participation to be achieved and require the government to be a part of in order to function properly. The difference between a civil liberty and a civil right is a civil liberty is a protection from the government and is considered to be natural privilege, however, a civil right involves the government to work with the people and is a civil duty. An example of a civil liberty would be the freedom of religion which means the government cannot control what religion is practiced by society protecting the people from the government controlling the people. An example of a civil right would be the right to vote as it requires government involvement in order to function properly and is considered to be a civil duty meaning you should vote as you need to be involved in your government. A document and a set of laws that protects civil liberties is the Bill of Rights. As civil liberties were written into law into the Bill of Rights and is a part of the foundation of the government the United States Constitution. A document that protects civil rights is the foundation of the government the United States Constitution. As the civil rights were written directly into the United States Constitution 's frame work as the right of being part of a jury and the right to vote were written into how the government

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This essay will explain Richards view and arguments regarding the legal restrictions/prohibitions of pornography, explain and analyze the Miller test, and finally conclude by evaluating Richards’ arguments. Millian liberalism would not allow the prohibition of pornography because it falls within the scope of private not public morality. The state must allow individuals the maximum ability to live within their own rights and pornography is not the law’s business when it is produced or involves consenting adults for the consumption of adults in private. Any harms that may result from pornography do not harm individuals in a way that would justify its prohibition. While there is not a clear definition of obscene, it can be understood to mean…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The speech must advocate illegal conduct, not just an abstract. The law that proscribe the conduct must not be vague or overbroad. Here, the Sedition Statute is facially overbroad because it failed to distinguished imminent lawbreaking from abstract speech. However, the statute has been narrowly construed to apply only to advocacy…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    National security and the protection of a state’s citizens is a primary duty for a government. The protection of human rights is also a great responsibility and central to having a modern democracy. A government though must sometimes restrict the human rights of some of its citizens in order to protect the state and its people. The judiciary has a role in deciding when to intervene in the restriction of the human rights of the citizenry when it feels the government has gone too far. In this essay I would argue that the judiciary should not use defence on matters of national security restricting the citizenry’s human rights and should fulfil its role as an independent check on the government in charge of safeguarding human rights.…

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Morality Of Pornography

    • 1572 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As Americans, we have the right to freedom of speech. (Mosser, 2013 sec. 2.4). Pornography would fall under this right. Therefore, pornography should not be censored because it would violate an individuals need that people have in order for their lives to be satisfactory.…

    • 1572 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    But, for Justice Stevens the real argument is not whether or not these rights trickle down to the individual, but the scope of what these rights cover. As noted in 2008 case District of Columbia v. Heller, where Dick Heller believed that the District of Columbia gun control laws violated his Second Amendment. The majority did agree that…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For example one argument that would go against the idea is presented from the view of a Kantian. This argument says you cannot treat a person as a mere means. This is saying that even though someone may of committed a crime worthy of the death penalty, it is not permissible for the person to receive it because that would be treating them as a mere means. In addition to the death penalty being used for retribution another way it can be used is for deterrence. It is thought that the death penalty is a good way to deter others from committing similar crimes because if they see that a person is sentenced to death they will not want the same out come, resulting in the person not committing the crime.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Substantive Due Process Clause keeps the government from violating certain fundamental constitutional rights of individuals or parties. The Supreme court relied on the Substantive Due Process clause to overturn the previous courts ruling and argued that the ruling violated the S. Due Process Clause, as opposed to the Equal Protections Clause. However, Justice Sandra Day O ' Connor argued in favor of the Equal Protections Clause to overturn the state laws against sodomy. The Court recognized that the privacy rights of consenting adults cannot be violated as this violates the Constitution. You would first file a complaint with the court and deliver a copy to the defendant.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ginzburg argued that he did not directly send obscene material, rather how to obtain it. However, in a 5-4 Supreme Court decision, the material was found to violate the federal obscene stature. The court argued that the sole reason for the publication was for “pornographic communication”, and decided that materials “containing sexuality in context of art, literature, science is not per se prohibited” because it is shown to advance our knowledge or understanding according to the same…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Therefore, the people should not claim rights which they have not allowed the government to regulate because they already belong to the people. Opponents to this argument will say that the powers given in the constitution are too ambiguous and could be poorly construed. They also questioned the harm in having a bill of rights, and believe there is already a truncated bill of rights in the constitution in the protections of individual…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, there is not strong enough cause to limit this fundamental right by prohibiting first cousin marriage. Arguments against first cousin marriage are that it is compelling interest of the government to limit it, and that it goes against societal norms; but these arguments are not strong enough to pass the strict scrutiny test. To limit a fundamental right, the government must prove three things. First they must prove their compelling interest in limiting the right. Next they have to show the law is narrowly tailored in serving this compelling government interest.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays