The Federalists And Anti Federalists Essays

1556 Words 7 Pages
During the summer of 1787, representatives from each of the thirteen colonial states, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, two starkly contrasting groups of state delegates, had gathered to discuss a new Constitution to replace the failed Articles of Confederation. Namely, the delegates had debated as to whether or not the new ruleset should have taken effect, as they possessed highly dissimilar viewpoints regarding the Constitution. There were several Anti-Federalist arguments against the Constitution’s ratification, alongside numerous counterarguments by the Federalists in its support. Specifically, the Anti-Federalists had been primarily concerned with the federal and state governments of the United States, fearing tyranny and excessive strength. These delegates also supported the Articles of Confederation, pointing out some of its adequacies relative to the proposed Constitution’s weaknesses. Additionally, they had brought into consideration the aspect of individual rights, which they had stated would be affected by the official imposition of the Constitution. Moreover, the Anti-Federalist delegates had pushed for a Bill of Rights, whereas the Federalists felt it unnecessary. Finally, the opposers of the Constitution took objection to skewed governmental representation. Eventually, the Constitution had received enough votes for it to be ratified into effect. However, the journey to its ratification had been far from a seamless one, for the Federalists had…

Related Documents