Advantages Of Federal Form Of Government

Improved Essays
What are some advantages that our federal form of government has over a strong national government in a highly centralized system? What are some disadvantages of a federal system like ours? Please give at least two examples of advantages and two examples of disadvantages. Our federal form of government being a sovereign system gets its power from the state government not directly from the American people. The individual states were also sovereign, which through their power from the people in that state through their state constitution. So the way our system works, using a top-down system on how the power is provided. So the federal government (via constitution) receives its power from the state government (via bill of rights), who then receives its power from the local government, which finally receives the power from the people. …show more content…
This occurred during the presidency of Andrew Jackson who threatened to use military force in support of a federal law. The state of South Carolina tries to veto national legislation passed by Congress, just by using the threat of federal powers caused state of South Carolina to back down. During president Bill Clinton’s administration, major reforms in the welfare program were passed, giving the states significant decision-making role in this program. Some of the disadvantages prevents the creation of national policy. We do not have one single policy, but 51 policies, which leads to confusion. It also could lead to the lack of accountability, who is to blame with the failed policy and overlapping borders between the national and state governments. Also the can be because of citizen ignorance, most citizens know little about state and local government and the policies. Even if they have the power to affect policy they often ignore the state or local government. There is less than 25% turnout for state and local

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Framers of the United States Constitution ultimately decided to give more power to the Federal government rather than the state governments because the articles of confederation wasn’t running our country in the right direction. The Articles of confederation had no central power, at all. The Federal government then became the main focus of the two contracts, because it was more stable. Under the Articles of Confederation the state held all the power and they gave some power to the federal government, which caused economic, trading and law problems. The constitution then gave more power to the federal government and gave the states less power because that would give a central power for people.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalist 15 Summary

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Because of the Articles of Confederation, the state governments have too much power…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under popular sovereignty states can become too powerful and can become too divided. For example, if popular sovereignty was in place and two neighboring states disagreed on a crucial topic, such as slavery, conflict could break out. The Kansas-Nebraska Act shows this situation clearly. “Bleeding Kansas” was the result of abolitionists who went to Kansas to support a vote against slavery while the supporters of slavery from Missouri came to vote even though they didn’t live there. This all led to extreme violence.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The states and the government have different rights that give more, or fewer powers to lead a state. If the government gains too much power that could give us too much taxes, and bankrupt us,…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus the power was given to the state governments instead of having…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The federal government has certain powers for making important decisions while state governments can make their own laws governing local issues. They share powers to make sure one doesn't get to powerful then the other. This is like the system of Checks and Balances. The Constitution limits many powers in our government. The Constitution has a check for anything and everything is always in order.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The state governments are actually designed to have almost the same powers as the federal government, just on a smaller scale. In Barron v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, it was declared that “Each state established a constitution for itself, and in that constitution provided such limitations and restrictions on the powers of its particular government as judgment dictated”7. This is essentially stating that each state has their own constitution and determines its own rules and laws within itself. This limits the control of the federal government over the states and allows the states to have much more leniency in making their own laws and regulations. However the state governments have the same thing going on within their governments.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To create well operating Government, with content citizens, there needs to be a balance of power. Federalism has the ability to stop racist, homophobic, and discriminative laws created by the states. Yet, federalism also has the ability to become more centralized and lose focus and control over the different states. For example, during a Macro Economics lecture last semester the professor stated, under the Soviet Union a Russian nail factory once received orders to create a certain amount of weight in nails. However, the workers didn’t create multiple nails and instead created one large nail weighing the correct amount.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since America's beginning, there have been multiple conflicts over the respective roles of national and state governments. In fact, the Civil War was actually fought over questions of states' rights. These question included: Can a state create a law that allows for slavery? and Does a state have the right to secede from the Union? Even today we still disagree on power when it comes to the federal government and the state governments.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ever since America was founded, its population has always struggled with the balance between national and local politics. A national government was favored because of its ability to maintain cohesiveness among the whole population, while local, smaller governments were favored in order to limit the powers of the national government and to prevent the tyranny the colonists faced before fleeing from Britain. While some Americans argue that states’ rights hold more importance over the power of the federal government, an “overall trend in American history shows the increase of dominance of local over national politics.” The dominance of the federal government is beneficial for American society because it is more efficient, more democratic, and…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Would you want the small state to vote to against something that does not affect them and it does not get passed because the smaller states are overpowering? Of course…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is because a state and local government make the citizen feel closer to their elected representative to voice their opinions. Also a strong state government can design policy, according to the local political culture and economic condition that might be more applicable to the local people; therefore the local government might be able to have a better distribution of resources, since they can localize the budget and fully utilized the resources they have. A strong state government is more likely to have better accountability since it is relatively easy to identify which department is held…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Comparison and Distinction of the U.S and Nevada Constitutions Xitlali Salas 1 A Comparison and Distinction of the United States and Nevada Constitutions As the foundations and frameworks for a government, constitutions play crucial roles in shaping the way a state and nation are run. While the Constitution of the United States outlines the way the federal government is run and act as the supreme law, each state has its own constitution to lay out the way its own government will run.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The State government runs the state that it is in and they are a higher level of government than the local level, which controls whatever city of county that they are in. One of the State government’s roles is to promote the state’s economy and take control over a lot of the government programs, such as risk and social management programs (Norman, 2008). Also just like how the Federal government controls the State government, the State government controls and watches over the the Local government’s of the State’s counties and cities. Another added power that the states have is that the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution states that any and all powers that aren’t under the Federal government’s control is then reserved to later be put under the states and it’s people. All state governments are complex and exact duplicates of the federal government and are made up of three different branches of government; executive, legislative, and judicial.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    That each state must be willingly enough to adapt and to change their constitution according to a federal system and that the government, from the national to the regional, must be prepared and equipped enough in undergoing the transition period of changing the government system. For decentralization is highly dependent to the political will of the government and to the cooperation of the society (Rodriguez, n.d). Castillo (2011) also suggested the same apprehension regarding the shift of Philippines government system to a federal system. He said that the shift of the government system depends upon the people because it the people who would live under the new constitution. Their capability and resiliency to change would determine the success of shifting the government to a federal…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays