Advantages And Disadvantages Of A Strong National Government

Great Essays
Some people believe that a strong central government is a more effective way of governance while others believe a stronger state and local government is better. This paper will further explore the advantages and disadvantages of each argument; as well as analyze the role of federal government and state government in the policy area of same sex marriage.
There are several advantages of a strong central government. First of all, a strong federal government is more likely to be more efficient in terms of their legislative body under emergency circumstances. They are more likely to respond to national level economic, military or health crisis in a timely fashion. Secondly, a strong national government can help achieve greater social, political and economical equality among its citizen. Also a strong national government is more likely to make foreign policy decisions that benefit the nation in comparison to a strong state government that prioritized the benefit of the state. A strong national Government can also provide unity among people; it enhances a strong sense of national pride and patriotism.
On the other hand, there are also some disadvantages about
…show more content…
This is because a state and local government make the citizen feel closer to their elected representative to voice their opinions. Also a strong state government can design policy, according to the local political culture and economic condition that might be more applicable to the local people; therefore the local government might be able to have a better distribution of resources, since they can localize the budget and fully utilized the resources they have. A strong state government is more likely to have better accountability since it is relatively easy to identify which department is held

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Federalism in the constitution helps guard against tyranny by giving neither the state or central government enough power to tyrannize. According to Doc. A, “James Madison, Federalist Paper #51, 1788”, “power...is first divided between two distinct governments” Also in the Venn diagram on Doc A neither the state or local government possesses all the power. They either have to share a power or only one side gets that certain power. This helps guard against tyranny because it is preventing the central or local government from holding all power.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The U.S Constitution established America’s national government, laws and rights for the citizens. Tyranny is when a person has a lot of power on their hands and having complete control. The constitution made changes and decisions to the government to prevent having tyranny. Although some people doesn't believe that the constitution can help and protect the citizens, nevertheless the constitution guarded the citizens against absolute power because of check and balances, federalism and amendments. Checks and balances made the U.S constitution guard against despotism.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carmelo Figueroa Per. 4 November 2, 2017 How Did the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny? Tyranny is one of the reasons that governments have gone to anarchy; People have rebelled and started riots or even wars due to the oppression of tyranny. The founding fathers of America wanted a government that was strong, but not too strong.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that though a strong government is needed by every nation for stability, but however, a strong government had its bad sides. With a strong government, the nation can become a monarchy again and can overrule and take control of every aspect and the people’s options or views wouldn’t matter or they wouldn’t have a say in anything or any decision. I also believe that if it wasn’t for the Anti-Federalist, we would be overruled by the government and that we, the people of the United States of American, would never have any individual right protected and there would be no creation of the Bill of Rights. Nonetheless, the Constitution was seen as a bundle of compromises and regardless of what side anyone was on.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government was considered weak because it has no authority over interstate and foreign trade matter. States are free to conduct their own respective business and the federal government has no say to whatever states do. So, with states acting like its own sovereign nation rather than a type of government under the federal government, the relationship between the two government is chaotic. In this paper, I am going to discuss further details about why federal government was considered weak under the Articles of Confederation and the changes that were written into the Constitution of the United States that solves the interrelationship problem between the federal and states under the Articles of…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is no need to have an established fear in the central government, our separation from Great Britain proves otherwise. Our independence should be enough proof that we are not trying to become another monarch where people don’t get a voice. Establishing a strong central government requires a lot of support from the people, which is why The Articles of Confederation wouldn’t suffice to the needs we demand. Having a stronger central government will unite us together and fuse us as one voice as opposed to allowing the states to have sovereign power.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the reflections of the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina and the unsteady response associated with dealing with the historic disaster that his New Orleans gives way to thorough discussion the levels of responsibilities and role of the federal, state, and local authorities in times of disaster and emergency response to such disasters like Katrina. Under the systems or practice where more power is pushed to the federal government to spearhead and to always play the lead role is not a good idea and Katrina exposed the truth in that. In as much as federalism exist, Homeland security and the disaster management organization should operate or response to national disasters and not just act on federal missions. Before, Hurricane Katrina made a land…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is likewise genuine that the nearby government has a superior thought of what is required for their particular populace. The state government is huge and does not generally have a minuscule vision over the neighborhood states. In this way, at times the neighborhood government has part a bigger number of obligations than the state government. Having said that we have to recollect that the administration, be it nearby or government, is of the general population, by the general population, and all the more critically for the general population. I trust that the most vital part of state government is to keep up social request.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The federal government has certain powers for making important decisions while state governments can make their own laws governing local issues. They share powers to make sure one doesn't get to powerful then the other. This is like the system of Checks and Balances. The Constitution limits many powers in our government. The Constitution has a check for anything and everything is always in order.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To create well operating Government, with content citizens, there needs to be a balance of power. Federalism has the ability to stop racist, homophobic, and discriminative laws created by the states. Yet, federalism also has the ability to become more centralized and lose focus and control over the different states. For example, during a Macro Economics lecture last semester the professor stated, under the Soviet Union a Russian nail factory once received orders to create a certain amount of weight in nails. However, the workers didn’t create multiple nails and instead created one large nail weighing the correct amount.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Having laws passed among all fifty states also maintains unity among the country and keeps all states on the same level as far as important regulations go. Also, each state has the equal power to bring an issue to Washington in hopes that it becomes favorable among legislators as well. In a country where discrimination has been present in more than just a few ways, federalism allows for the continuity of rules that can be guaranteed to be withheld for all people of all…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Who should have more power the Federal or State Governments? I think that the Federal Government should have more power than State Government. When depending on the State Government they were only depending on it for money. When the people of the states came together to change the Article of Confederation the State Government lost some of its power and got weaker the Federal Government gave the power from the State to the central Government. The Federal Government was stronger than the State Government from the very beginning the Federal Government had the power to take power whenever it wanted and the state could not do a thing about it because, the Federal Government was stronger in many other aspects that the state…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The State government runs the state that it is in and they are a higher level of government than the local level, which controls whatever city of county that they are in. One of the State government’s roles is to promote the state’s economy and take control over a lot of the government programs, such as risk and social management programs (Norman, 2008). Also just like how the Federal government controls the State government, the State government controls and watches over the the Local government’s of the State’s counties and cities. Another added power that the states have is that the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution states that any and all powers that aren’t under the Federal government’s control is then reserved to later be put under the states and it’s people. All state governments are complex and exact duplicates of the federal government and are made up of three different branches of government; executive, legislative, and judicial.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Two advantages of living in a federal political system are: Localized Governance - Elected representatives live in close proximity to the people they represent, which better positions them to understand the problems and offer unique solutions to the citizens of their communities. Freedom to Form Policy - State governments have the liberty to adopt policies that may or may not be followed nationally. For example, same sex marriage were not recognized by the federal government until 2015, but before than these marriages were given legal status within certain states that approved of it. Two disadvantages of living in a federal political system are: Uneven distribution of wealth - Because natural resources, industry, and employment opportunities…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The relationship between the federal, state, and local governments is an important relationship that has evolved with the changes of American politics over time. Many scholars that study these relationships prefer the term “Intergovernmental Relations,” rather than “Federalism,” because of their knowledge of how the governments actually work. Federalism, as defined by Robert Christensen and Laurence O’Toole Jr, is the system of authority constitutionally apportioned between central and regional governments. The term intergovernmental relations, on the other hand, is the subject of how our many and varied governments in the United States deal with each other and what their relative roles, responsibilities, and levels of influence are and should be. The definitions alone can explain the preference of these scholars when defining the relationships between the governments of the United States.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays