Advantages And Disadvantages Of A Strong National Government

Great Essays
Some people believe that a strong central government is a more effective way of governance while others believe a stronger state and local government is better. This paper will further explore the advantages and disadvantages of each argument; as well as analyze the role of federal government and state government in the policy area of same sex marriage.
There are several advantages of a strong central government. First of all, a strong federal government is more likely to be more efficient in terms of their legislative body under emergency circumstances. They are more likely to respond to national level economic, military or health crisis in a timely fashion. Secondly, a strong national government can help achieve greater social, political and economical equality among its citizen. Also a strong national government is more likely to make foreign policy decisions that benefit the nation in comparison to a strong state government that prioritized the benefit of the state. A strong national Government can also provide unity among people; it enhances a strong sense of national pride and patriotism.
On the other hand, there are also some disadvantages about
…show more content…
This is because a state and local government make the citizen feel closer to their elected representative to voice their opinions. Also a strong state government can design policy, according to the local political culture and economic condition that might be more applicable to the local people; therefore the local government might be able to have a better distribution of resources, since they can localize the budget and fully utilized the resources they have. A strong state government is more likely to have better accountability since it is relatively easy to identify which department is held

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Federalism in the constitution helps guard against tyranny by giving neither the state or central government enough power to tyrannize. According to Doc. A, “James Madison, Federalist Paper #51, 1788”, “power...is first divided between two distinct governments” Also in the Venn diagram on Doc A neither the state or local government possesses all the power. They either have to share a power or only one side gets that certain power. This helps guard against tyranny because it is preventing the central or local government from holding all power.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carmelo Figueroa Per. 4 November 2, 2017 How Did the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny? Tyranny is one of the reasons that governments have gone to anarchy; People have rebelled and started riots or even wars due to the oppression of tyranny. The founding fathers of America wanted a government that was strong, but not too strong.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is no need to have an established fear in the central government, our separation from Great Britain proves otherwise. Our independence should be enough proof that we are not trying to become another monarch where people don’t get a voice. Establishing a strong central government requires a lot of support from the people, which is why The Articles of Confederation wouldn’t suffice to the needs we demand. Having a stronger central government will unite us together and fuse us as one voice as opposed to allowing the states to have sovereign power.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the reflections of the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina and the unsteady response associated with dealing with the historic disaster that his New Orleans gives way to thorough discussion the levels of responsibilities and role of the federal, state, and local authorities in times of disaster and emergency response to such disasters like Katrina. Under the systems or practice where more power is pushed to the federal government to spearhead and to always play the lead role is not a good idea and Katrina exposed the truth in that. In as much as federalism exist, Homeland security and the disaster management organization should operate or response to national disasters and not just act on federal missions. Before, Hurricane Katrina made a land…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalism in the United States is based on a two-level government system that control is divided between national government and subnational government. The significant points in this chapter further explains federalism, the articles of confederation and new federalism. Federalism is a two level geographical system of government in which control is distributed between national and state government. It serves three main points: first; it’s part of a system of official checks and balances that were created to influence power by sharing it between two levels of government, second; it produces a political system where interest can be characterized in the national government, and third; federalism creates governance system where the states can…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The American Founders utilized federalism in order to both prevent tyrannical leadership and to try and incite more participation in government and politics. The Massachusetts Constitution of 1780 states “The body-politic is formed by a voluntary association of individuals: It is a social compact, by which the whole people covenants with each citizen...that all should be governed by certain laws for the common good. ”1 This is a perfect example of federalism, as there is not one singular person or entity in charge, but rather a group of groups working together in order to ensure that no one group becomes too powerful and that everyone has equal representation. Federalism is based on the principal that there is a central government made up of…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Who should have more power the Federal or State Governments? I think that the Federal Government should have more power than State Government. When depending on the State Government they were only depending on it for money. When the people of the states came together to change the Article of Confederation the State Government lost some of its power and got weaker the Federal Government gave the power from the State to the central Government. The Federal Government was stronger than the State Government from the very beginning the Federal Government had the power to take power whenever it wanted and the state could not do a thing about it because, the Federal Government was stronger in many other aspects that the state…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To create well operating Government, with content citizens, there needs to be a balance of power. Federalism has the ability to stop racist, homophobic, and discriminative laws created by the states. Yet, federalism also has the ability to become more centralized and lose focus and control over the different states. For example, during a Macro Economics lecture last semester the professor stated, under the Soviet Union a Russian nail factory once received orders to create a certain amount of weight in nails. However, the workers didn’t create multiple nails and instead created one large nail weighing the correct amount.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The local should have more control in their power because when the state does not like what they do all they have to do is get a bill passed that prevents the locals bill to go into effect. The local government is important because those are the bills getting passed for the people who live those certain cities and they want the changes to happen but sometimes the state does not want the something since it could affect them negatively by losing some money. The state government has the final say on all the bills because they choose if they want to go against it. I think that it is hypocritical for the state government to impose its will on the policies of the local because they say that they want the best for the people but when they vote for something they go against some of them even though that is what the people want.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ever since America was founded, its population has always struggled with the balance between national and local politics. A national government was favored because of its ability to maintain cohesiveness among the whole population, while local, smaller governments were favored in order to limit the powers of the national government and to prevent the tyranny the colonists faced before fleeing from Britain. While some Americans argue that states’ rights hold more importance over the power of the federal government, an “overall trend in American history shows the increase of dominance of local over national politics.” The dominance of the federal government is beneficial for American society because it is more efficient, more democratic, and…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Two advantages of living in a federal political system are: Localized Governance - Elected representatives live in close proximity to the people they represent, which better positions them to understand the problems and offer unique solutions to the citizens of their communities. Freedom to Form Policy - State governments have the liberty to adopt policies that may or may not be followed nationally. For example, same sex marriage were not recognized by the federal government until 2015, but before than these marriages were given legal status within certain states that approved of it. Two disadvantages of living in a federal political system are: Uneven distribution of wealth - Because natural resources, industry, and employment opportunities…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The U.S Constitution established America’s national government, laws and rights for the citizens. Tyranny is when a person has a lot of power on their hands and having complete control. The constitution made changes and decisions to the government to prevent having tyranny. Although some people doesn't believe that the constitution can help and protect the citizens, nevertheless the constitution guarded the citizens against absolute power because of check and balances, federalism and amendments. Checks and balances made the U.S constitution guard against despotism.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many years ago our founding fathers made a government without tyranny, they were smart to do this because they didn't want to have all the power in the hands of one person or group. Delegates (55) gathered in Philadelphia at the Constitutional Convention to frame a government without too much power in the hands of one person or a group. The Constitution was signed September 17, 1787. How did these framers protect us from tyranny ? They wanted to create a government without tyranny and they did by creating federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and the small state big state compromise.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The relationship between the State and Federal governments is complex and they are broken up into many different parts. Also the State and Federal Governments have different amounts of influence over the economy and the citizens. Another thing is that the government system and relationship between the two is very complex and controversial. This paper will discuss the relationship between the State and Federal governments and the complexity of the systems of government.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The relationship between the federal, state, and local governments is an important relationship that has evolved with the changes of American politics over time. Many scholars that study these relationships prefer the term “Intergovernmental Relations,” rather than “Federalism,” because of their knowledge of how the governments actually work. Federalism, as defined by Robert Christensen and Laurence O’Toole Jr, is the system of authority constitutionally apportioned between central and regional governments. The term intergovernmental relations, on the other hand, is the subject of how our many and varied governments in the United States deal with each other and what their relative roles, responsibilities, and levels of influence are and should be. The definitions alone can explain the preference of these scholars when defining the relationships between the governments of the United States.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays