Analysis Of Descartes's Meditation

Improved Essays
Human beings are thinking creatures but they are more than that. They live their lives with different memories and experiences to guide them along the way. To prove that a person knows whom they are by proving that they think is nonsensical. Within Descartes’s meditation is the nature of humans will be shown through the thinking thing or cogito but this is not accurate at all because humans are more complex beings than just thinking things. First, I will demonstrate what the second meditation, its fifth objection, and Descartes reply are instructing on. Then I will address the cogito and how it does not prove the existence of the nature of humans, as Descartes’s believes it does. Finally, I will show how the reply does not meet the requirements …show more content…
However, Descartes never states in the cogito what the inner substance or the mind is what makes people think. It is already known that people are thinking creatures along with many other types of types of beings. What is unknown is how things have this capacity to think. Descartes tries to use the cogito to answer where the thinking in humans comes from but can not due to the fact that the cogito is no new information rather just a new way to look at an older idea. Thinking is not the question asked but rather, “What we are unclear about, what we are looking for is that inner substance of yours whose property is to think,”(Fifth Objection, 71). What Descartes was meant to solve with his meditation was the true purpose of thinking and how humans think. With the cogito, all he showed was that he was a thinking thing, something that has been known for almost all of human history, that all humans are thinking …show more content…
This is due to the fact that the two are directly related to one another and cannot be found without finding out both. Descartes believes that the various attributes of a substance can tell use that the mind creates attributes that can be determined by the object and the knowledge of the object in the mind. (Fifth Replies, 72). All of this according to Descartes, all of this is to prove that humans understand the nature of the mind and use it to create the true knowledge of the world due to the fact that it is the mind that creates the attributes that identity common objects. Those attributes allow humanity to understand and interpret the world to their own unique understanding along with creating the basis for

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    First of Descartes wrote a series of six meditations to try to argue and establish his philosophical views. In this part of my paper I’m going to explain the first, third, and fifth Meditations Descartes has to offer, to give you background on this topic. Though there are other arguments, they don’t apply nor impact the validity of Descartes Ontological Argument. In Descartes first Meditation, Descartes says…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will then proceed to analyze the third meditation in which Descartes focuses on a causal argument for existence of God who is perfect. By the end of the third meditation, Descartes appears to prove that he is not God and that God exists. Descartes knows that he exists by the very fact of “cogito”. He cannot doubt that he exists because something cannot doubt or have awareness and not exist.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    We will begin by analyzing the Meditations by Descartes that he makes and what they mean. We will look at the many of the themes that are present in his meditations. We will then move onto looking at the dialogue between Ponens, Nous, and Tollens. We will express their objections to the Meditations. Finally we will conclude with the argument that is most convincing.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Title: Thinking things Vs. Physical things The novel, “Mediations on First Philosophy” written by Rene Descartes, is a man of suspicion which is why he questions things, and at times himself. He tries to seek the truth. In the text, Descartes assumed that thinking thing was the mind, whereas the physical things consisted only body, parts of the body, and the brain; in other words, they were different from each other.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He says in the first meditation he is doubtful about all the things he thinks he knows, and in the second meditation he states that he believes he exists when he thinks he exists. Descartes concluded that whatever he truly believes in clearly and distinctly therefore then must be…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Another dilemma the Cogito faces is that, even if Descartes had not used the first person notation to prove he is, all he had to say was thought is taking place. The statement would have been “There is thought, therefore I am”. However, this is also disputable because the premise involves invalid reasoning, which leads to an invalid conclusion. Nevertheless,…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes is known for doubting physical objects and people around him. He argues anything that can be doubted should be treated as false. The term knowledge to Descartes means an event or occurrence that is true. Knowledge requires certainty, and without that certainty, it cannot exist. Descartes’ dream hypothesis and evil demon hypothesis show that anything in our world can be fabricated.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By claiming that thinking and reason are the perfections God has given humanity, he is trying to get everyone to use these perfections more. Descartes is trying to inspire people to think more through the entirety of his Discourse on Method. He uses his own story as a model for what can be gained by reasoning and deep thought. God is set up as an ideal to further push his readers to think and reason more. The predominately Christian audience he is writing to will more than likely start to view thinking and reasoning as good when they are presented as perfections given directly to humanity by God.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Meditations of First Philosophy, Descartes explains philosophical meditations written over six days. The Second Meditation concerns the nature of the human mind. Descartes argues that the human mind is better known than the body. A major claim of his is his most famous quote “I think, therefore I am,” meaning a thinking thing, such as himself, can exist. In this essay, I will prove that Descartes’ argument in the Second Meditation for his existence as a thinking thing is convincing.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction The argument whether or not the mind and the body are distinct substances raises a still on-going debate. In this essay, I proceed to give evidence as to why the Cartesian dualism theory is flawed. First, I am going to introduce a few of Descartes’ arguments and his position on the matter. Then, I will try to pick his most appealing argument and put it up against logical reasoning and other philosophers’ viewpoints. Finally, I am going to conclude how Rene Descartes proposes fallacious arguments which object his mind-body problem.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The argument in Descartes’ Sixth Meditation for the real distinction between the mind and the body ultimately secures his dualist position. Despite his argument appearing to make some mildly questionable leaps and seemingly ignore one potentially devastating point altogether, his position is clear and strong. I will begin by reconstructing Descartes’ argument, cover the grievances listed above, and then hope to argue that, despite these objections, Descartes’ position remains a sound metaphysical view. In the Sixth Meditation, Descartes begins by declaring that, firstly, all things one can clearly and distinctly perceive can be created by God, and secondly, if one can clearly and distinctly perceive one thing without calling to mind another,…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Meditation 6, we learn that Descartes comes to the conclusion that the mind and body are two separate entities. His belief is that through the idea that mind and body are separate entities, without the other, one can still exist. He comes to this conclusion by arguing that the mind, a non-extended thinking thing, is an entirely different being than the body, an extended thinking thing, is. He believes that the mind and soul are united to the body but still can be separated from each other and still exist.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two philosophers that have heavily influenced the world of philosophy as we now know it, René Descartes and John Locke, have not always agreed on the same beliefs. In fact, they almost always argued on what each other felt was true except for the unlikely agreement on a few things. This brings me to one particular argument dealing with the issue on innate ideas. Descartes side of the argument believes that we born with ideas (innate ideas) and Locke believes our ideas come from experience and the senses. Ideas have to stem off of something and the only way for us to have that base for an idea is to experience it.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This establishes the fact that since it is the mind that holds consciousness, it is what can be relied on as opposed to what we experience through our senses since we cannot doubt the mind because the only way to doubt is through the mind itself. Descartes believes with certainty that he exists because he can think without needing a physical body and essentially concludes to “I think, therefore, I am.” The importance of Descartes conclusion of cogito ergo sum is the differentiation of the mind, the body, and consciousness, and how interconnected one is to the…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays