Does Descarte's Dilemmas To Prove He Exists

Decent Essays
Descartes’s famous Cogito Ergo Sum (I think, therefore I am) faces a dilemma. The dilemma he faces is that his premise begs the question. Instead of building up to a conclusion that would prove his existence, he states “I think” to already assume he exists. Then he carries on saying “Therefore I am” to ultimately conclude he exists. Hence, his conclusion does not follow upon his premise. Another dilemma the Cogito faces is that, even if Descartes had not used the first person notation to prove he is, all he had to say was thought is taking place. The statement would have been “There is thought, therefore I am”. However, this is also disputable because the premise involves invalid reasoning, which leads to an invalid conclusion. Nevertheless,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Descartes’ second meditation, he offers up an argument for Defective Nature Doubt that brings forth the idea that we can’t be certain of anything we perceive being actual and real (153). Descartes thinks that there is a possibility that we are constantly being deceived due to the fact that we don’t know, with perfect certainty, where our ideas originate from (154). He tries to describe a method in order to dispel this Defective Nature Doubt by giving an argument for the existence of God. I think that the argument he gives for the existence of God is valid, yet I find it to be unsound due to the fact that a few of his premises are can easily be doubted. In order to express this opinion, I will first provide explanations of the premises and…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the passage from Descartes’ Meditation, the conclusion is that Descartes now has reason to doubt all of his beliefs including those of his senses. The premises seem to be: (1) If an omnibenevolent god wouldn’t deceive us then there must be an evil demon doing so. (2) If an evil demon is our source of deception then one cannot know true beliefs. In the passage from Sweetman’s “The Pseudo-Problem of Skepticism” the conclusion is that we should not take the problem of skepticism seriously because we have no reasons to do so. The premises seem to be: (1) We know that it is not possible to be a brain in a vat.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rene Descartes’ statement, “I at least know for certain that nothing is certain” perfectly illustrates the multiple problems that arise when all rational beings realize that their senses can deceive them and that the very foundation of their knowledge is based on the assumption that everything they encounter is real. Thankfully, being aware of the problem is the first step in solving it. The juxtaposition of Rene Descartes and William Shakespeare reveals a difference of opinion when they set out to examine and solve the problems that arise from the doubtfulness of the knowledge provided by our senses. Although both authors agree on the importance of solitude and the potential problem of an evil genius manipulating our senses, Descartes’ use…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meditation two, Descartes focus again on certainty, thru ontology and metaphysical tools. By means of these branches, he rationalizes the idea of certainty and existence. Nonetheless, he knows that God is deceiving, for he might not even inhabit space, furthermore he can’t trust the senses since the senses are also deceiving him for he doesn’t have any of the physical attributes to sense.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes begins this argument with the confirmation that God exists. He suggests that God exists because…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    3.) In the Third Meditation and Proslogion, both Descartes and Anselm are trying to prove the existence of God. Descartes’ argument was based on two ideas: a hierarchy of realities (objective reality) and clear and distinct perceptions. Anselm on the other hand correlates his argument with the belief that God is something which no greater can be imagined, thus God exists in both reality and in understanding. In this essay, I will be talking about the contrasting views that of Descartes’ and Anselm’s in proving the existence of God and I will also compare the similarities they shared since they both use ontological arguments to prove God’s existence.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Descartes: The Special Causal Principle and the Existence of God In the 3rd Meditation, Descartes concludes that the he is a thinking thing and continues by determining whether there is anything that exist outside of him. Descartes then provides an argument which aim is to determine whether God exist, and this is presented as an argument for the existence of God based on an idea. In this, the Special Causal Principle arises and well as the concept of “clear and distinct ideas”. The aim of this paper is to ascertain whether the argument makes use of the two principles by critically evaluating the argument based on the idea of God.…

    • 1972 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Q: Explain why Descartes wants to establish a radical doubt. Then summarize the main steps of his argument in his meditation 1. Finally, what conclusion does he arrive at? A: Descartes is questioning everything he thought he once knew for certain, this includes challenging the senses along with our perception of reality. By establishing a radical doubt, Descartes searches for a foundation of knowledge.…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Metaphors

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He hides under the idea that he refuses to become how his deceivers wish to see him, and although that may be true, he is also acting as a deceiver to himself. This is presented in Ayers ‘Cogito Ergo Sum’ “For I must exist in order even to conceive that I do not. And so, according to Descartes, one may draw the conclusion that ‘this proposition, I am, I exist is necessarily true, each time it is expressed by me, or conceived in my mind’” (27). The context in which “I think therefore I am,” in Descartes’ text highlights how he is who he believes he is. But, Lakoff and Johnson write, “In allowing us to focus on one aspect of a concept, a metaphorical concept can keep us from focusing on other aspects that are inconsistent with that metaphor”(10).…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If I close my eyes and doubt that everything exists, all I can hear is the heater running in the room I’m in. I don’t really smell or taste anything. I would have to agree with Descartes in that I must exist because I am thinking. I must have a brain or I wouldn’t be able to think, so I am alive and a thinking thing. If I couldn’t think, then I wouldn’t be living.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But from time to time I have found that the senses deceive, and it is prudent never to trust completely those who have deceived us even once.” (Descartes 33) However, after focusing on that concept he realized that in order to think and doubt the existence of everything, he must first exist. Following that line of reasoning, he realized that his existence was the only thing he knew to be true, and by extension, his intellect and his ability to think was also…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will argue that Descartes, using his own criteria for making and avoiding mistakes, cannot be making a mistake when he proves the existence of God in meditation three in his Meditations on First Philosophy. I will develop my argument in two parts. First, I will present Descartes’s argument for how mistakes are made and avoided.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes the father of modern philosophy, a philosopher known to believe things to be true until it was proven otherwise. In these meditations Descartes had complex opinions. In the case of Descartes in meditations a greater individual than him existed. Descartes’ claim insisted with the existence of the idea of God to the real existence of God. To support his argumentative opinions, Descartes points two distinct arguments that were utilized by “Augustine in the fourth century and Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth century” (Shouler).…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the following essay, one wishes to discuss why there can never be any justification for a belief in Other Minds. Descartes offers up “I think therefore I am” in First Meditations on Philosophy (Descartes, 1641), which has it’s fair share of problems but one wishes to use this quote to illustrate that while Descartes only proved that ‘I’ exist within one 's own mind, there is nothing to say that this must extend to others too. Or even to anyone but Descartes and Myself. And while that may seem an irrational claim, one shall go on to justify why this claim may hold as much rationality as its negation.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This establishes the fact that since it is the mind that holds consciousness, it is what can be relied on as opposed to what we experience through our senses since we cannot doubt the mind because the only way to doubt is through the mind itself. Descartes believes with certainty that he exists because he can think without needing a physical body and essentially concludes to “I think, therefore, I am.” The importance of Descartes conclusion of cogito ergo sum is the differentiation of the mind, the body, and consciousness, and how interconnected one is to the…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays