Capital Punishment Doesn T Support The Death Penalty

Nowadays if we open the news wherever we attention them, we find crime history every single channel. The bad news such as criminals has become a piece of our daily lives. So that about this news means that ignore the darkness behind our society? No, absolutely not. Disqualifying crime and criminals is our responsibility, and we can’t reject it. Getting the properly blamed to the death penalty or sentenced is very significant. Definitely not every criminals obligate a case due to they do not have any option to survive such as who steal some foods from supermarket, however someone do this bad feelings for relaxation. I do not support the death penalty for every murder. The death penalty could continue in order to eliminate the refuse of our …show more content…
If insane people are completely unresponsive to encouragements, then their emotional serve do not social goal, thus leading to another beneficial factor of the death penalty. People who have no social goal do not benefit society, culture, or the basic rules of humanity. For example; Heroine man who used this drugs every day in front of his baby and he killed his wife and his daughter in front of this baby after he was finished raping his daughter and his wife he had begun this baby such as a pedophilia and then the guy who was a psychopath he let this baby to die. How do we see the little line between mental illness and criminally psychopath or those are they going to take resume the responsibility for their behaviors? Actually I do not want to say that all mentally handicapped people should be exposed to the death penalty because it is not good for rule of society and humanity. However, some people pose fatal danger to the society in highly an inhumane way, like as this example. In such a way, the death penalty becomes crucial for the benefit of the society. I claim each criminal, do not care how inhuman s/he is, and should be given the minimum one chance to modification him/herself. So, I do not recommend the death penalty for people who have done only one killing. Nevertheless, I have seen lots of evidence almost every year people have committed several murders (e.g., serial killers), or have committed crime even after captivity. For such people, I recommend the death penalty. It must be a limit to which community should put up to. If somebody does not realize that going around murder people is incorrect, then I trust, that letting such people live is not only a great threat to the society, but also a great problem. Critic of the death penalty, Adam Belau, wrote, "Prevention by means of incapacitation occurs only if the executed