Register to read the introduction…
This is not to argue about the pros and cons of the death penalty and juveniles, but to give data it can inform the controversial argument to focus on the Death Penalty and Juveniles. This is important to the general area under study because it will give a clearer view on the opinions of each person on the death penalty and juveniles. The intent is to provide details of death penalty and juveniles, whereas to give an understanding of what causes these young offenders to commit a crime and why the law agrees with the death penalty on juveniles with no difference from the adults. Additional studies show the death penalty used with juveniles may perhaps appear to be civilized or not. Sentencing a juvenile to death could lead to asking questions for
…show more content…
Child abuse and neglect cases need to be top priority. To accomplish these things all legal agencies such as Police, Prosecutors, Courts, and the school system need to work together with the families of the juvenile offenders and the people within the community. With these agencies working as a separate entity, the outcome only brings the death penalty and juveniles as one. As juveniles commit crimes, many are sentence to death row. The argument on how murders deserve the death penalty after all “the punishment “should fit the crime. The craziness about this is the saying “the punishment should fit the crime” is like saying the murder should be murdered, and the rapist should be raped. What benefit is there in killing children, saving the taxpayer money or obtain revenge there has to be a better means for criminal justice agencies in the handling of young offenders. Placing juveniles in prison with adult criminals only creates criminals, because the juvenile would then learn how to survive within the surroundings of the adult population Instead, there is a chance youth offenders are of ages 12 to 16 placed in rehabilitation for a chance to develop as productive adults. More than likely juveniles have gone through life in a poor environment, abusive home, or have been neglected they could even lack in education. Some candidates pass through the justice system, most often placed on parole or
Child abuse and neglect cases need to be top priority. To accomplish these things all legal agencies such as Police, Prosecutors, Courts, and the school system need to work together with the families of the juvenile offenders and the people within the community. With these agencies working as a separate entity, the outcome only brings the death penalty and juveniles as one. As juveniles commit crimes, many are sentence to death row. The argument on how murders deserve the death penalty after all “the punishment “should fit the crime. The craziness about this is the saying “the punishment should fit the crime” is like saying the murder should be murdered, and the rapist should be raped. What benefit is there in killing children, saving the taxpayer money or obtain revenge there has to be a better means for criminal justice agencies in the handling of young offenders. Placing juveniles in prison with adult criminals only creates criminals, because the juvenile would then learn how to survive within the surroundings of the adult population Instead, there is a chance youth offenders are of ages 12 to 16 placed in rehabilitation for a chance to develop as productive adults. More than likely juveniles have gone through life in a poor environment, abusive home, or have been neglected they could even lack in education. Some candidates pass through the justice system, most often placed on parole or