They became engaged and, as was said earlier, a lawyer announcing that Rochester was still legally married interrupted their ceremony. Richard Mason, the brother of Bertha, followed the lawyer and thus Jane discovered the truth, leading to her leaving Rochester. However, Rochester had the choice of legally divorcing her. Should he have divorced his wife, or should he have stayed married, as was the situation in the book? There were multiple reasons that could explain as to why Rochester did not. Firstly, the money that he had inherited was from the Mason family, to which Bertha was attached. Perhaps he was afraid that, if he divorced Bertha, he would lose the large amount of wealth that had come with the marriage, which was the only way he had attainted his estate and socialite position. If he divorced Bertha, this money would be lost and he would be left
They became engaged and, as was said earlier, a lawyer announcing that Rochester was still legally married interrupted their ceremony. Richard Mason, the brother of Bertha, followed the lawyer and thus Jane discovered the truth, leading to her leaving Rochester. However, Rochester had the choice of legally divorcing her. Should he have divorced his wife, or should he have stayed married, as was the situation in the book? There were multiple reasons that could explain as to why Rochester did not. Firstly, the money that he had inherited was from the Mason family, to which Bertha was attached. Perhaps he was afraid that, if he divorced Bertha, he would lose the large amount of wealth that had come with the marriage, which was the only way he had attainted his estate and socialite position. If he divorced Bertha, this money would be lost and he would be left