The Cosmological Argument For God's Existence

Improved Essays
The argument for God’s existence has remained a constant topic of conversation, and at the head of much controversy. An argument attempting to prove the existence of God can be found through the Cosmological Argument, known also by its informal name as the “first cause argument”. The argument raises the issue of a first cause and where all things in the universe originated. This issue serves importance by highlighting conflicts humanity faces when questioning the origin of all things, and whether or not it was caused directly by God. The argument also sheds light on the natural human tendency to require an explanation for virtually everything that exists. This is what philosophers call as sufficient reasoning, a need to know the cause for everything …show more content…
Logic dictates that an infinite regress of causes is impossible, and that things can not cause themselves to exist. It is only logical to assume someone with extraordinary abilities including omnipotence, omnipotent, and omnipresent, could have caused the universe to exist. This ultimately leads to the belief in God’s existence. Although the argument follows a cohesive logical order, however, the conclusion which assumes God created the universe, is faulty. The argument that God brought about the universe is somewhat unconvincing and contradictory. Although the argument lays a clear conclusion, it potentially creates more problems than answers. Many find the argument useless, leaving people nothing, and continuing to question the initial first cause. The single most important objection given towards the cosmological argument lies within the question of who created God? Other than the clear statement that God was the initial cause for all things that exist, it appears God is exempt from causation. Non-theists suggest that if something clearly causes itself to exist, therefore nothing exists before it exists at all. Logically, the idea seems impossible. While arguments posed criticize the cosmological argument and its flaws, it does not prove it to be false. However, while taking into account the lack of present evidence, the argument for God’s existence based on his apparent creation of the universe is lacking with insufficient credibility to go behind it. The attitude of skepticism, appealing to science and the scientific method as ways of determining what is true, drives critical thinking and applying a variety of information from several sources to reach a fair conclusion. Conclusively, while many arguments exist attempting to exist God’s existence, the cosmological argument does not succeed, failing to provide sufficient reasoning for the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “Contingent beings require a necessary being as their ultimate cause.” (3) There are several objections to this theory. The first argument is the atheistic claim that the universe has always existed. This objection can only go against the temporal forms of the argument though. The non-temporal form of the cosmological argument does not deal with the concept of time, and is able to stand up to this objection. The second argument is that if everything in the universe needs a cause, then so must God.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In nature we see that each occasion has a cause; consequently, there more likely than not been an underlying cause to get the universe to unfurl as so. The underlying cause is God. This contention does not include any decisiveness, yet rather just pushes the inquiry further for one could request that what created God exist? A run of the mill answer to this is God does not have any significant bearing to the circumstances and end results law expressed and exists in light of the fact that. It appears to be difficult to contend this however one could without much of a stretch envision that some matter just exists as well; and that it doesn 't make a difference to the circumstances and end results administer yet exists in light of the fact that.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hence there is no way to know reality behind the empirical world. A natural consequence is the complete negation of knowledge of God. To Ayer, even the word God or a transcendental being was meaningless because it was not definitional. This is worse than traditional agnosticism, which at least, tried to figure out the existence of God. To agnostics such as Ayer or Wittgenstein, even though one may experience God, such experience is inexpressible.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under that definition, he concludes that God’s existence is either necessary or impossible. It is not impossible for God to exist so it must be necessary that he exist; therefore, he exists. Malcolm comes to the conclusion that God’s existence is necessary impossible using two scenarios. In scenario one God’s existence is possible but he failed to exist. For God to have failed to exist something had the power to prevent his existence, but God by definition is all powerful.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I started out skeptical, because that is the best way to determine if something truly exists. And, after looking at many main arguments arguing that god is the ultimate creator and only explanation for the universe, I have not found anything that has made me change my stance. As Baggini describes,…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    By deducing this, Theists see God to be a necessary being, and our entire universe is His doing and even we are His creation. What McCloskey claims however is that the world itself is not grounds for saying it is proof that God does exist. Of course, the cosmological argument is by no means hard evidence or facts to prove Gods existence, however it does offer a in depth argument that points in that…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rather, there are only conflicts between science and natural claims without evidence. To clarify, the introduction of evolutionary biology does not challenge religion itself. An elaborate theory of evolution does not challenge faith attitudes, belief in supernatural creation, nor belief in ultimate purpose. However, it absolutely does challenge several interpretations held in religious communities. The vital keyword of this statement is “interpretation.” There is no objective method to interpret any particular religious text, so it’s illogical to say any single interpretation is the correct one.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He bases it off of the idea that there is nothing superior to God or there is nothing superior to the Truth in which God is Truth. But we have no way of nothing what is superior to something else. We might look at something and think we are superior to it while if we saw the situation from it’s side we would see that it is superior to us it is just not showing that it is making us think we are superior. So, we have no way of knowing what is superior to something else. It also runs into the same problem with the good and bad argument that there is not universal superiority that we know of.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Man cannot think like nor understand the things of God without the mind of God. Man’s thoughts are finite and limited and God’s thoughts are infinite and without boundaries. With God all things are possible and nothing is impossible for God. Aquinas argues that God is not omnipotent if He cannot sin, lie, do evil or that which implies contradiction to nature. Aquinas concludes that God omnipotent power to do all things only refers to objects, actions or states of affairs that are not self-contradictory.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    God: The Existence Of God

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages

    His argument looks at the broad sense of what God is and disregards your individual opinion on what God is if you have one. Someone can argue with the argument by saying something not completely relevant to the argument such as saying we have not actually proved the existence of God because we still do not know if he is the creator of the universe is. However, that has nothing to do with our argument. We have proved the definition and therefore existence of God; not whether or not he is the creator. Through the use of deductive argument, the strong premises have persuaded me that God does in fact…

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays