The Corrections Of Codex Sinaiticus And Textual Transmission Of Revelation
1034 Words Dec 1st, 2016 5 Pages
To begin, Malik referenced several other works surrounding the textual conveyance of the Book of Revelation. Bousset’s work on the matter of text corrections was a valued source for Schmid’s conclusion. However, his study of Milne and Skeat’s work in conjuction with the German author’s, Bousset’s, led him to the conclusion that Sinaiticus was produced in the mid fourth century. Malik contested this conclusion and cited Hernandez’ work most often to support his claim. Hernandez, while even using the same Milne and Skeat source, concluded Schmid’s made a “serious dating error” and Sinaiticus should be dated in the seventh century. Malik’s continued citations of various composition dates for Sinaiticus pointed to one certainty: scholars cannot definitively agree on when it was produced.
To prove his argument, Malik discussed many subtle corrective actions (or errors depending on a scholar’s outlook) taken by scribes from various traditions. How any of these…