The Consequences Of The Minimum Legal Drinking Age

1128 Words 5 Pages
Age doesn’t make a difference in Drinking Under the Influence (DUI) accidents or fatalities of drinking behind the wheel. In fact, there are absolutely no correlations between the Minimum Legal Drinking Age (MLDA) being 21 in America versus other places, such as Italy, that have a MLDA of 18 and lower. Furthermore, multiple studies taken everywhere have noted that moving the imbibing age to 18 years does not have an impact of deaths relating to alcohol besides DUI’s, such as Alcohol Poisoning. Concluding that if the MLDA was to be moved down to a lower age, we would gradually start to avail the economy with its debt issues only furthermore due to more people of an age group drinking. Moving the drinking age lower would not only help our …show more content…
In 2006, 72.2% of twelfth graders reported drinking alcohol at some point in their lives.” (“Should the Drinking Be Lowered from 21 to a Younger Age”). Expressing this fact,helps to prove that having a lower drinking age would be helping this country with it’s deep debt because young adults would be buying and consuming alcohol. Although, when people hear about the drinking age being decreased, they have vigorous opinions of disagreement. Adults do not like the conception of their 18 year old legally drinking alcohol. But, the other options would include having their 18 year old illegally drinking at a party and later getting involved with the police, which is causing more problems that they, and their parents, will have to deal with. “Allowing 18- to 20-year-olds to drink alcohol in regulated environments with supervision would decrease unsafe drinking activity.” (“Should the Drinking Be Lowered from 21 to a Younger Age”). This is a very true statement that many adults with children have to consider. When you turn the age of 18 in America, you are to be considered an ‘adult’. This ‘adult’ status includes doing things such as buying tobacco products, lottery tickets and being able to vote. So, why isn’t drinking on the list? 18 is a defining point for an abundance of things and once you turn …show more content…
It goes without saying, children will do a lot to disobey their parents in any way. When a child or young adult drinks and it’s illegal, it engenders this rebellion that they did against their guardians. Karis Rogerson did an article on how life was different in America compared to Italy. In her article, she did not only say how it was astounding that she could no longer drink at her age, but how it was odd that even if her parents gave her some champagne on New Year’s Eve, it was illegal and they could potentially get thrown into jail for doing this. “The closer it got to my 21st birthday, the bigger of a deal it became.” Karis stated. (“ Viewpoint: Why America Should Lower the Legal Drinking Age”). Adolescents don’t have just their parents to disobey, but as Karis exclaims, just as well as any school out there, we are made to sign a paper saying that we will not partake in drinking or smoking for that fact. As teens are, it just becomes another reason to drink because it becomes another authoritative figure to

Related Documents