Economies And Cultures During The American Civil War

Improved Essays
The American Civil War began at Fort Sumter in 1861 and lasts until 1865. This war has been referred to as the first modern war in which the Union fought the Confederacy. The North went under the label of the Union while the South was the Confederacy. The president in charge during these years was Abraham Lincoln. During the Civil War the economies and cultures of the North and the South differed in almost every factor. As stated by Foner “The population of the North and the loyal border slave states numbered 22 million in 1860, where only 9 million persons lived in the Confederacy, 3.5 million of them slaves” (Foner 404) the North had the upper hand in every aspect relating to the war. Since the population differed so did the type of people …show more content…
In regard to slavery “Well before Lincoln made emancipation a war aim, blacks, in the North and the South, were calling the conflict the “freedom war”” (Foner 412) this is due to the fact that Lincoln did not want to make the war about slavery in the fear that some would move towards the side of the Confederacy. Before the Civil War started in 1861 there was tension in the nation with regard to territorial expansion. In 1803 there was the Louisiana Purchase that helped to expand the nation west of the Mississippi River. A few decades later in 1846 through 1848 “The Mexican War was the first in which an American army invaded another country and occupied its capital” (Foner 374). With the U.S. Mexican War and the Louisiana Purchase there was new territory with a lack of jurisdiction. Lincoln as stated before did not want the war to be about slavery but within a couple of years into the war he had no other option then to create the Emancipation Proclamation. Even before the Proclamation was signed there were several compromises set in place …show more content…
What led to the fall of the party system started at the root “The Kansas-Nebraska Act opened a vast area in the nation’s heartland to the possible spread of slavery by repealing the Missouri Compromise and providing that settlers would determine the status of slavery in these territories” (Foner 383). The Kansas-Nebraska Act ultimately led to violence between those against and for slavery in 1856 which is termed “Bleeding Kansas”. “The Republican Party- a coalition of antislavery Democrats, northern Whigs, Free Soldiers, and Know-Nothings opposed to the further expansion of slavery- would become the major alternative to the Democratic Party in the North” (Foner 386). That led to Abraham Lincoln winning the Election of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Before the Civil War, there were many economic differences between the North and South. For example, things produced in the South and North were different. In a letter to John Adams, Thomas Jefferson says, “We use little machinery. The Spinning Jenny and loom can be managed in a family; but nothing more complicated.” (Document 2) This means that the states in the North focused more on the use of machinery, while in South states, little machinery is used. This is also why Jefferson explains, “...we shall depend on your northern manufacturers.” (Document 2) Clearly, the South could not produce the same type of goods as the North. These differences may have begun during colonial times, when the New England colonies and Southern colonies already…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery in the beginning phases of the war were responsible for the food, materials and jobs while their white masters went off to war in the name of preserving the great truth, according to Confederate Vice President Alexander H. Stephens, “the Negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery…is his natural and normal condition” (Tanner 89). In other words, the Confederacy was fighting to keep the institution of slavery in place, which was a firm part of southern society that many Confederates believed to be the correct way of living. However, the Confederacy was put at a disadvantage during the war because of how African-American slaves, who sometimes ran away from their white masters, provided Union armies and generals with useful information of the Southern territory, as well as acting as “spies, scouts and river pilots” (Barney 174). This could have prevented had the Confederacy agreed to emancipate their African-American slaves early on in the war. Jefferson Davis critically rejected the possibility early on in the war until confederate generals Robert E. Lee and Patrick Cleburne pushed for any remaining slaves to be armed and put into Confederate armies. While the notion seemed absurd to many southerners, Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863 (Barney 182) was a major strategic victory for the Union as not only did the Confederacy lose all hope of foreign intervention from the British, because of how they were opposed to slavery, but also because by the time the Confederate government agreed in March of 1865, the date was too late for the tides to be turned. This resulted in the war ending before the Confederacy could emancipate its slaves as well as the loss on April 9, 1865 at Appomattox Court House (Barney…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq Essay

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The Emancipation Proclamation gave the Union the moral high ground, an increase in relations with European powers, and a potentially large new segment of manpower ripe for recruitment” (Whitenton, 2012). The white people in the north saw the goal of abolition as wildly unpopular as very small numbers had strong feelings in support of the idea. The northerners were in a similar opinion as the southerners when it came to the issue of the blacks or the slaves. They were not ready to lose their manpower and a lot of tension was created initially as the union supporters disagreed with the new goal of the war. To help ease the tension in the North Lincoln recruited more blacks into the Union army where they were to assume roles of a free man. Slaveholding was a part of the southerner’s culture and economy and they had to fight hard to maintain the black community. The European countries stand on slavery was clear as none of them joined the Confederates’ during the war. The Europeans were against slavery and saw it as morally wrong. On January 3rd of 1863 Lincoln led an endorsement for the southern region slave’s emancipation (History.com Staff,…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In reality, that was only the case following Lincoln issuing the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863. The significance of the Emancipation Proclamation was that it served as turning point in the war. It turned the war from a conflict about the rights of the States into a war over slavery. Both the United States and Confederate had so much more to fight for after Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation. In the North, the war went from being about preserving the Union to abolishing slavery and punishing the South. In the South, losing the war meant the abolishment of slavery. The stakes in the war increased heavily for both sides following the…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As The United states began a time of expansion into the west in the late 1830’s, debates over whether or not slavery would be permitted in those territories vacated by the native Americans caused great disagreements in Government and Society. While slavery is the most obvious reason for succession, Westward expansion and the rights of the new states were responsible for much of the violent conflicts that lead to the Civil War. States struggled to find common ground, but the differences between North and South and new Immigration made A series of compromises were created but by 1860 compromise had failed.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The North and South were a part of the same country but their economies were very different. The North's economy was based on manufacturing finished goods at a fast pace using lots of factories and workers. The South's economy was based on farming cash crops and raw materials to export to other countries. Document A from the What Caused the Civil War DBQ shows that almost all of the cotton production in the U.S. was in the South. Document B from the What Caused the Civil War DBQ shows that 90% of the yearly value of manufactured goods came from the North. This meant that the two regions had extremely different economies even though they were a part of the same country. This caused some major differences between the North and South. The manufacturing of goods in the north meant there were lots of big cities, factories, and people. Since the southern economy was based on agriculture the South didn't have big cities and didnt have as many people. This caused problems because each region wanted the country to focus on their economy and help their economy. The North ended up getting there way in this issue and made tariffs. Tariffs were a tax put on imported goods. The North wouldn't need to pay this tax much because they made all their finished goods themselves. The South was furious about these tariffs because since they only made raw materials they were forced to buy imported goods.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the election of 1860 Abraham Lincoln ran for president and when on to become the first republican candidate to win an election. However, his election meant bad new for the southern states that were dependent on agriculture and used slavery for their advantage to obtain higher profits. According to the book America past and present, “By…

    • 1799 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On April 12, 1861 the legendary American Civil War broke out. This was a war that would decide the fate of the United States of America. A major problem within the government back then was deciding on whether or not the government had power to outlaw slavery in unmarked U.S. territories. As more territory was acquired, the greater the tension grew between the free and slave states. Luckily, the Civil War was delayed due to various settlements between political parties regarding slavery- such as the Missouri Compromise, Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The new party was mainly led by anti-slavery Whigs and some northern anti-slavery Democrats. The main focus of the Republican Party was preventing the practice of slavery into the new expanding territories. They also showed interest in federal funding for the transcontinental railroad and other transportation improvements. Due to slavery, they were trying the keep the Missouri Compromise from repealing. The first Republican candidate running for president election lost against the Democrat James Buchanan. In the election of 1860, the Republican Abraham Lincoln won the election. A surprising fact is that he did not get any votes from the south. He believed that slavery can’t be just stopped at once, but it should not be able to spread in the new territories. However, the southern misunderstand President Abraham Lincoln and considered him as a danger against the practice of slavery. Thus, the southern criticized the Abraham Lincoln’s…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Civil War was fought by the North and the South who were raised with different cultures, that’s why they fought differently. The Union fought like the Teutonic/Anglo-Saxons and the Confederates fought like the Celtic. The way the president’s lead the Union and the Confederacy affected how they fought in the Civil war. Ultimately the South fought for their home and their way of living life, and the North fought to keep the Union of the North and South, and also to get rid of…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Civil War Economy

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One of the major demographic pressures that lead to the Civil War was a difference in ethnicity between the citizens of the North and the South. From the very beginning,…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The union went across Missouri to Arkansas in march 1862. WOn the battle and it ment that there would be no confederate empire beyond texas. The battle of Shiloh in Tenesee marked the end of the confederate 's bid to controll the western theater. The far west and most of the Mississippi valley was the unions. Since the confederates were blockaded in they made a deal with Britain that allowed them to build ships in there. It did not do much for the confederates though as the unions navy kept on building. The south was hopeing desperatly that the other nations would join since the reliance on cotton but no one ever did. Lincoln then created the emancipation proclamation on july 17 1862, which eventually led to the union using black soldiers which greatly imporved thier chances of winning the war. This was a savy and impressive move by lincon since he was not "politically expericened". Lincoln also started to use women in the war as nurses and other places they could help out. The south harnessed companies such as he Tredegar Iron Works to help witht eh war effort. They then started to draft white males and taking…

    • 1024 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Social Issue

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The society in the north and the south were both set in different ways, but both were also bad. In the south, the southerners still measured their excellence on wealth, land and slaves. Being this way, this then caused the south to have a very rigid social structure. The structure had a ranking order being rich plantation owners on the top, white farmers and workers in the middle section, and African Americans on the bottom, which were mostly slaves. Slavery, being put into serious action, also had a deep effect on the society in the south. Society was also majorly impacted by the churches people went to. The churches would preach to the people telling them what was right or wrong, and making decisions for them. Usually, small groups of plantation owners had seemed like they had taken over the economy and politics. This put them in more control than others. There were also few public schools, which caused most children to be illiterate. A very small part of African Americans in the south were free, which caused them to be treated differently than whites. The society in the north was different, but not necessarily in a good way. Most people in north weren’t wealthy or powerful. Some also believed that hard work could have ordinary people become rich. “1860, seven in ten lived on farms” (History Alive! Page 265). Some people still did live on farms, but most lived in the new cities. Though these northern cities were growing rapidly. Both new and old cities in north lacked sewers, which then made the streets incredibly filthy. Disease spread rapidly, which took the freedom of being healthy. Africans were somewhat free but couldn’t vote hold office serve on juries or attend white schools or churches. This was just like the south. There were problems in both northern and southern societies in and before the Civil…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Leading up to the civil war, there were two distinct regions within the U.S. that later clashed. The two areas had very different transportation and cities, and the two economies were drastically different. Transportation in the North was much more readily available than in the South. In the North railroads and steamboats were being created (known as the Transportation Revolution), while in the South, the only way to move items around was to go around Florida and up the coast. In both the North and the South goods were transported frequently, but in the north there were many reasons for why people would transport.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The north believed in a free labor system where everyone had a chance to be successful if they worked hard in their industrialized manufacturing economy. The south believed in slave labor, where planters could get rich from free forced labor in their agricultural dominated economy. The north believed that slavery was a flawed system that created an aristocratic planter class, not allowing for self made success. The south believed that their economy and success relied on slavery, and that without it, the whole economy would collapse. The north believed that secession was unconstitutional, while the south believed that it was constitutional. Both the north and south believed that their ideology was the correct one. The civil war then, was a violent way for each side to try to force their way of life on the other, and prove that their way of thinking was the…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays