The Barbarian Invasions: The Fall Of The Western Roman Empire

Good Essays
The fall of the western Roman Empire was not caused by the barbarians’ attempts of invasion. Rome fell because a failing tax system and internal strife. The tax system was failing because the Roman Empire had overspent on military exercises and the coin had depreciated in value. As the coin depreciated, taxes were raised and the wealthy fled the cities in an attempt to avoid paying taxes. It is clear that the Roman government understood the threat of usurpers and the dangers that they posed to a united country because the emperors went to great lengths to stop usurpers. The barbarians’ invasion attempts most likely exasperated the issues within the Roman Empire because the emperor would have to choose between stopping the invasion and saving …show more content…
It is important to remember that the Roman Empire had dealt with the barbarians and their invasions for centuries (Figures 1 through 4), so the invasions would not have been a great surprise. The Roman Empire was bordered by fragmented ethnicities … As previously mentioned, sometimes the surrendering of Roman land to the barbarians was beneficial to the empire. However, there were times when the barbarians rebelled against or invaded the Roman Empire for land. One of the rebellions was in 378 when the Goths who had been allowed to cross the Danube into Roman territory rebelled against the Romans. One of the most significant invasions by the barbarians was in 406 C.E. In 406 C.E., the Vandals, Alans, and Sueves, who were loosely allied with each other, crossed the Rhine into Gaul and eventually taking control of Gaul in 409 C.E. The invasions of these barbarian ethnicities came in areas that were not as heavily protected by the Roman military because the Empire’s resources were stretched out too much. With the decreasing military, the soldiers in Gaul and Spain would have eventually had to leave. So in reality, the barbarian invasion just sped up the process. Under the reign of Romulus Augustus in 476 C.E., the western Roman Empire was overthrown by General Odoacer, a barbarian employed by Romulus Augustus. Though technically a barbarian did bring about the end …show more content…
Barbarian ethnicities may have utilised the issues within the Roman Empire to cause the fall of the western Roman Empire in the mid- to late-fifth century. However, there is no solid answer for whether or not the barbarian invasions caused the fall of the western Roman Empire, but it is clear that they played some part in it. From intentionally encroaching on Roman land in order to receive territory in the weakened state to conquering an entire section of the Empire, the barbarians were involved in the fall of the Roman Empire through land invasions. The interactions between the barbarian ethnicities and the Roman Empire were based primarily on land, which was an issue in the fall of the Empire. It is clear that barbarians exploited the failing Roman state. The barbarians are played a clear role in the story of Rome, land successors, but whether or not the fall was caused by them remains

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Had there been Roman government that was effective in it’s final stage, the distant Romanized provinces would have kept Roman rule over the barbarians. In conclusion, the Fall of Rome was unavoidable due to three main arguments, the first one being that Rome expanded its empire too far which lead to military overspending. Secondly, the military overspending proved to be infertile, because it deemed impossible to protect such as vast amount of land with the constant attacks from enemy barbarian tribes daily. Thirdly, without supporting leaders and the Roman legions, the empire fell into a long sad spiral into corruption and political unreliability. Therefore, the “‘Holy Roman Empire is [no longer] holy, nor Roman, nor an empire’…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This power, however, came at the cost of violent movements best labeled as invasions. Roman citizens clearly saw barbarian groups as attackers who took their land by force rather than through peaceful means. These movements adversely affected the economies of these areas, further demonstrating their violence. While the barbarian movements into the Roman Empire allowed for cultural assimilation, they were primarily…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pompey’s conquests sparking Caesar’s alliance with Crassus and eventual military takeover was the cause for a thinned troop force. With growing opposition surrounding them, generals thought that they could keep Rome a military superpower, but they forgot about the problems within the Roman Republic. No longer was the primary focus of a growing republic agricultural development and commerce, but now is military superiority. Revolts could not change the minds of these power hungry generals who even began reducing upper class pay to fill the void of money they had from ambitious militant campaigns. The resulting uprisings did nothing but hurt the unity of the republic even further.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Analysis City Of God

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It was the rise of Christianity and the fall of paganism which caused much tension between the people in the state of Rome. Around 401-410 CE, this is where we see the Visigoths invade into Italy and in the end, under the rule of Alaric, sack Rome. This began the fall of Rome. In addition to that event, we then have the Vandals which sacked the North of Africa, which cut Rome off Roman grain supply. Following that tragic event, we then have the Huns attack around 440-454 CE, which the Huns threatened Rome, in which Rome paid them off but then attacked.…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The external elements are defined primarily as population movement and attacks by barbarians, such as the Huns. Nevertheless, internal elements played a role, though informed by the article “Transformations within the Roman world must…be taken into account when we look at the ability of outside groups to create increasing mayhem inside its borders,” (Heather, 109). The author acknowledges “the mayhem inside [Romes] borders,” (Heather, 109) though argues that over a prolonged period of time the involvement of barbarians led to internal consequences, subsequently Rome’s declined…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    After conquering an area, the soldiers obtained many spoils, such as sacking the area for precious goods, and enslaving the people. The goods gained from war were intrinsically important to the Roman system, for the survival of the Republic almost seemed to depend on gaining new resources from war. Therefore, Raaflaub highlights that while political and social gains were important, there did exist the question of being able to obtain wealth, resources, and survival through warfare, which would increase the frequency of war. Even more central to Raaflaub’s argument is his insistence that the ancient Romans engaged in a type of preemptive warfare out of fear of being conquered. The ancient Romans remembered well the fear of tyranny after the…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Livy: The Roman Way of Declaring War The way of declaring war remained an extremely important topic when it came to the romans. The romans believed if that if they did not observe all necessary formalities in beginning hostilities, then the angry gods would turn the luck towards the Romans enemy. The fourth king of Rome, Ancus Marcius, was originally a peaceful and skilled solider but while in war with Latin he is known to have instituted what is now known by the romans as war (The Conquered). These ways of war are declared in Livy: The Roman Way of Declaring War. Though the romans followed these ways of war until the fall of Rome the Livy: The Roman Way of Declaring War did have some downsides.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Because they had been at the top for so long they forgot their fight for glory, especially because a lot of their power was based in a strong military. This signaled for the end of the remarkable power that the Roman empire had because it lost its roots: the ambition to be the greatest. As stated in the source, this directly affected Rome’s success in fighting battles and they were bested by barbarians as a result. An easily exposed army was an invitation for more barbarians to come and exploit Rome, therefore putting pressure on its borders. Additionally, Romans could avoid being drafted into the army, so the empire had to pay for disloyal Germanic mercenaries to increase the size of its military.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However critics believe that military mistakes didn't cause the fall of Rome. In the article it gives more reasons that political instability was a bigger reason for the fall of Rome. People disagree with this claim because they they found evidence against it . This is why Some people think military mistakes was a bigger reason for the fall of Rome. According to, “ what were the Primary reasons for the “fall” of Rome Mini Q it states that Rome fell mostly because of people getting laziness and carless.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Once Constantine put a resounding halt to the persecution of those who practiced this new religion, it is believed that the credibility and confidence stocked in Roman emperors began to dissolve. The society had once viewed the emperor as the highest authority, and in a sense he was godlike. However, once the people placed their hope in a monotheistic faith such as Christianity, they no longer held the same view of the emperor. This alteration of viewpoint weakened not only society but also the emperor who perhaps began to place less emphasis on his unwavering ability to lead his people (The Fall of the Roman Empire). Though these arguments are quite convincing it is well known that the eastern component of Rome, which is believed to have been more focused on Christianity than the West during this time period, survived significantly longer than the western component could possibly have hoped to stand.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics