Fall Of The Han And Roman Empire

Improved Essays
Two prosperous empires that exceeded in developing trade, creating new inventions, and leaving a legacy behind collapsed. How could such a prosperous empire fall? The western Roman empire and the Han dynasty both collapsed during the classical era for similar and contrasting reasons. The fall of both empires occurred due to internal pressures like epidemic diseases, economic and social issues while external problems like invasions and nomads taking place at the same time. After both empires collapsed, the regions faced change in their culture like the spread of Buddhism and Christianity and adaptation to the previous empires customs. The fall of both empires occurred for similar but contrasting reasons at different times; the Han dynasty …show more content…
These epidemic diseases transpired in the second and third centuries for both the Han and Roman empires. Smallpox and measles were common diseases as well as the bubonic plague that took a tool on the population; in Rome, for example, a smallpox outbreak along with other epidemic diseases and war decreased the population by one-fourth of the previous size. In China the spread of disease occurred at a later time but had similar effects. Additionally, economic issues may have contributed to the fall of the Roman Empire and the Han dynasty. Epidemic disease not only decreased the population but caused a decline in trade. The Han dynasty also faced challenges with a decline in trade; both empires turned towards self-sufficiency. Both empires faced economic pressure involving taxes as well. In China, the government had trouble collecting taxes to support their army, whereas in Rome the taxes began to rise. Roman economic pressure extended; as trade decreased, the value of money went down. Farm fields became overused and started to lack production bringing in poor harvests; the value of gold and silver decreased. However, China faced rebellions from peasant, such as the Yellow …show more content…
An example of an external factor includes both empires dealing with clashes from outside individuals. In China, a semi-peaceful relationship with the nomads always had a chance of dangerous raids. In western Rome, Germanic invasions led to a downfall in most of western Rome. Furthermore, the western Roman empire faced low funds for defense and trouble finding patriotic soldiers. As well, a notable group of invaders in China were the Xiongnu who even created the Sino-Xiongnu Wars between 133 BCE to 89 CE. The Chinese and the Xiongnu fought in an important area of the silk road: the western regions of China. Han ended victoriously, but the win almost demolished their government. Most of the Xiongnu went and joined other nomadic people; some joined the Huns which would invaded Rome. Attila, a warrior-king, formed a powerful military. To begin their attack on Rome, Attila and his army attacked the Germanic peoples causing them to seep into the Roman empire for safety. Little resistance faced Attila and his army and they eventually led to western half of the empire destroyed. The end of imperial authority occurred after general Odoacer removed the last empire in Rome, Romulus Augustulus. Nomadic people built states succeeding the fall of the Roman empire. China went a different route, and after a chaotic state three kingdoms were

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty of China are considered to be the greatest civilizations of the ancient world. The Roman Empire lasted from 27BCE to 476CE and the Han Dynasty lasted from 206BCE to 220CE. The Romans and Han still contribute to our modern day society through the technological and political philosophies they made. Both the Roman Empire and Han Dynasty rose to power through strong leadership, which allowed the Roman Empire and Han Dynasty to overcome their rivals becoming the dominant powers in their respective regions, however; the fall of both nations were significantly different in regards to outsider invaders and the potential recovery.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Dynasty of China from 206 B.C.E-220 C.E. and the Imperial Roman Empire from 31 B.C.E-474 C.E., are two well known classical empires. They both contained many similarities and differences between their imperial administrations. In the Classical Period, the Han Dynasty & Imperial Rome both used their governments to establish a state religion and centralized bureaucracy. However, one major difference was that while the Han was a family dynasty, Rome was a republic.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fall Of Rome Dbq Essay

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Roman Empire was a great and powerful force that influenced many other civilizations after it fell, but before and leading up to its decline it faced many problems. The Empire fell due to the cause of internal and external problems: unstable economics, weakened political and government structure, and ineffective military. These problems show that…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion, both the Han Empire and the Imperial Roman Empire share many similarities within their military and use of a bureaucracy style of governing. Despite being far away in distance and completely unrelated to one another, the two powerful empires used the same methods to gather respect and territory. Their similarities provided leaders with a blueprint on how to be successful as an emperor during that time period. All in all, both the Roman and Han Empires were extremely fascinating regions that garner respect from…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Decline Of Roman Empire

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These two Empires were named the Western and Eastern Empire. These Empires were ruled by two separate emperors but were still united. The Roman Empire, ran by two emperors, ruled all of Rome, but one side of the land was more defendable. This created vulnerability for the one Empire which made it fairly easy for it to be attacked. The Eastern Empire contained most of the valuable trade routes which left hardly any for the Western Empire. This created weakness among the Western Empire because they weren’t able to finance or trade for the necessities to run an Empire. The split in the Empire created one powerful, trade prosperous Empire and one Empire which had little to no trade. This created one powerful and one weak Empire. Since the Western Empire wasn’t able to acquire the necessary resources to be a powerful Empire, they began to be attacked by barbarian tribes. These attacks eliminated any of the scant trade that the Western Empire was receiving. The Western Empire struggled in trade which resulted in not being able to afford a powerful military that could protect their border and keep order among their people. Barbarian tribes began to notice that the Western Empire had grown weak so they seized the opportunity and began to attack the Western Empire. Their attacks were eventually successful…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Empire shared many characteristics with the Roman Empire like their government ideology, but also differed in areas including religious influence in the government and government systems and complexity.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the classical age, empires and dynasties conquered many large territories. These empires and dynasties included the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty. In a result of expanding their territories, the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had wealth and power. All goods must come to an end, as these empires and dynasties suffered a disastrous collapse. The collapse of the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty were more similar than different because their collapse were caused by internal problems within the government and their lack of beliefs in their leaders.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Between 200 BCE and 200 CE, the two leading empires in the world were China and Rome, due to their widespread and rapidly expanding territories. Both empires expanded significantly throughout the span of their empires. To control such vast areas, Rome and China implemented comparable practices, yet significantly different. The Chinese government was much more centralized and bureaucratic, when being compared to Rome. In governing such extensive territories, bureaucratic and legal considerations overthrew individual necessities. Empires required standard measures, uniform decisions, predictable outcomes, and individual compliance. Yet, large numbers of people can flourish under a government that keeps the peace or makes choices that are responsible,…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    and 600 C.E. as a result of numerous internal and external conflicts. The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty internally ruptured due to political ineffectiveness as a result of corrupted emperors and officials and externally disintegrated because of nomadic invasions from Germanic tribes in Western Europe and the Xiongnu in Asia. However, the Roman Empire saw the decay of the faith of the Empire in the citizens as they turned to local landlords for protection, while the local landlords of the Han Dynasty began to defy the government and conquer surrounding territories and farmland.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. -476 C.E.) and Han China (206 B.C.E.-220 C.E.) are likely the two most well known empires of the time period Because of their large size and influence. When describing methods of political control, the two mirrored each other in many ways but, in some respects, had contradicting ideas. The methods of political control used by Imperial Rome and Han China were similar regarding their use of political theologies to justify leadership, their centrally structured government, and their use military power, but exhibited different roles of citizens in government and techniques for maintaining order in the lower class.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both empires were centralized based off their empires locations. Without the centralizing of governments neither empire would have been able to strive. The Imperial Romans needed a centralized government because of the benefits such as Pax Romana the Imperial Rome golden age. Without the government being a coherent whole they wouldn’t have functioned properly, and would have been in constant chaos because there weren’t many natural barriers keeping the Roman land separate from each other. The same for the Hans who needed to be together and connect to maintain the empire as it was such a large piece of land. Throughout their time of rule both empires were imperial and under the rule of one ruler. The Romans had the Principate that called for one ruler controlling the government even though there was a senate. While the Han had rulers whom were deemed god because of what they had done for their people, and country, making both empires imperially centralized and without both aspects they probably would not have strived, and been as great as they are seen in…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To Summarize, both the Mauryan and Han empires maintained control by incorporating religion and politics to rule. Both empires also used social heirarchy, though by different methods, to control the people. The Mauryan empire died along with its last emperor, Brihadratha, when he was murdered by the people who would go on to create the Sunga Empire. China went into political chaos before the end of the Han dynasty in 220 CE. Both of the Empires’ falls could be blamed on weak government and loss of political control, further proving just what a vital component it is to any…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fall Of Roman Empire Essay

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    Christianity’s control grew greatly and rapidly and this minimized the power of the empire. The church leader’s power increased while the Roman Empire’s power decreased. “Over time, Church leaders became influential and took away power from the emperor.” (Google.com) Some of the Christian’s beliefs and ways of life conflicted with the laws of the empire and the people chose Christian laws over the Empire’s laws. This contributed to the decline of the Roman Empire.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    China and Rome both structure their societies very similarly through their military, social structure, and religions. And while these civilizations were great, when their empires fell, their falls were from the same source of problems. These civilizations also had differences through how they first started expanding, how the people they conquered assimilated, what their empire were influenced by, and what happened to China and Rome after their falls.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fall of the ‘Western Roman Empire’ was caused by a number of internal and external factors spread over more than a century. Their are many theories providing an explanation for the the fall of the empire and pinpointing the beginning of its decay, however one of the most accepted theories begins in the reign of Emperor Constantine (306-337 A.D) and his part in the split of the Roman Empire into two ‘West’ and ‘East’ regions and ends with the abdication of Romulus Augustus in 475 A.D. Responsibility is also given to the many waves of barbarians migrating into and pillaging the outer regions of the Western Empire, as well as widespread corruption, economic and social issues within the empire.…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays