Thomas Aquinas Research Paper

Improved Essays
Thomas Aquinas was an Italian philosopher and theologian of the Medieval period who raised valid arguments as to why evil exists. His first argument was that evil in fact does not exist but that there is only a “privation of the good” (Renick, pg 33). What this means is that God creates only good, therefore evil does not exist. Things only turn into bad when the good of an object of person has less of the good that it was initially given. Aquinas’s next arguments all go together; at least that is how I preserved it to be. Many question if we truly have free choice because our God is all-knowing and all-powerful. So, he would always know what we were going to do, where and when we were going to do it; therefore, we would not have free choice …show more content…
40). This here is another question that was brought up. This is questioned because many believe that if God exists, he is our “all-knowing (or omniscient), knowing perfectly everything that happens even before it happens” (Renick, pg. 40). If this is true and God is truly an all-knowing God, then we would not have free choice. It would contradict his power. An all-knowing God cannot ever be wrong. If he knew what was going to happen and every detail to anything then we were only following God’s wish not our free choice. Aquinas argued this, though. He claimed that if we did lack true freedom then God would be an unjust god and we would pretty much be punished for doing wrong when we had no control of us doing anything at all. One way that Aquinas tried to argue this point was to say that God was “timeless” (Renick, pg.43). Aquinas claims that God is beyond time. He sees the past, the present and the future all at once while we humans, are within time. I would disagree with Aquinas at this point. Not only do I think that it does not make sense, but I believe that God is an all-knowing god and even if he were timeless then that would still mean that he would be able to see the future, therefore making him the all-knowing God that he is. But, while he is an all-knowing God, I do also believe that we have free choice. This ties in with what I mentioned earlier about God allowing evil to be present. We have the will to choose between …show more content…
49). I loved this article for many reasons. The main reason why I did was because it was so relatable. These are questions that I have always asked myself. Never were they questions that I liked to verbalize out loud just because I never like it to be known that my faith is being questioned. Although this article was very relatable, I found myself not agreeing with many of Aquinas’s arguments. Just as many other critics in the past have, I too, found that Aquinas would try to solve some of the problems by being clever with “empty wordplay” (Renick, pg. 43). I found that especially true when he argued that God was timeless. My favorite argument made by Aquinas was that of God’s will to allow things to happen necessarily or contingently. I have always thought about this. I know that our God is all-powerful and all-knowing, therefore I know that although we may not always understand why things are the way that they are but we must understand that they are the way that they need to be for various reasons. I believe that this is where we must trust our God and have faith that he has our best interest at heart and that he only wants what is best for us. Having said that, he also wants to make sure that we know him and follow him. This would mean that we

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    A counter to this announcement is God gave people the decision to act uninhibitedly. In this way, the issue of insidiousness was produced by the nature of flexibility of decision that god connected to people. In any case, this comment would undermine God 's omniscient quality since all-knowing ought to incorporate knowing the future, or this would turn into a point of confinement to it. Thusly, by knowing the future disasters that giving human 's through and through freedom would bring about would even now miss the mark concerning being maximally great. Along these lines, a God that is omnibenevolent, supreme, and omniscient can 't coherently…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    100). Weirob believes that if God is all-powerful and all-knowing then He will know our next move prior to us making the move. Weirob asks the question “If so, how can I be free? If not, if he doesn’t know what I am going to do, then how can he be omniscient?” (Perry et al., pg. 102).…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pico believes in unlimited human potential, while Augustine believes our potential is predestined by god's will (limited). Both Augustine and Pico had to reject the main argument of each others position, in order to end up in the position that they took. In order for Pico to arrive at his position, he had to reject Augustine's main argument on original sin . Because if Pico believed in original sin, that would make humans imperfect. If you are not perfect, then your potential cannot possibly be unlimited.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    God created humans with the will to choose the good in a battle between good and evil. However, He also granted the power to choose evil. Mackie argues why, then, did God not use His powers to create a world that always freely choose right? “His failure to avail himself of this possibility is inconsistent with his being both omnipotent and wholly good” [1;348]. Humans describe things using comparative methods.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because God is set up as a being who possesses all knowledge, we are forced to entertain a wide variety of possibilities. At a mere surface examination, it does seem like an all-powerful God would wish and prevent evil from occurring. However, we as humans simply have limited mental capacity, and we cannot know everything. This argument created a God which is far beyond our limited capacity. Therefore, it is well within the realm of possibility that in fact God in possession of all knowledge has a reason for allowing evil to occur.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Natural disasters, death of a loved one, business failure, so many things are evil, and Augustine explains that the only reason any of that happens is free will . He stresses on the fact that God wanted us to have free will, but there is a problem in that theory. He discusses that there are some people that have free will and not sin at all; this he argues is a defect in that person’s character because God creates humans as “wholly good” and never responsible for evil. He further explains that origin of evil is incomprehensible and uses the idea that good is the privation of evil (the theory that Aquinas supports) . Furthermore, he claims that evil is not separate, or in competition, with the force of good, rather evil is parasitic on good .…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Freewill Argument

    • 2367 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Both Mackie’s logical problem of evil and his further dismissal of the freewill hypothesis incorrectly focus on God in terms of his power, not of the knowledge that controls it. I will not make the same mistake. So, I will regard every exertion of power as an exertion of knowledge for God must have reasons behind exerting power. If there is no smart reason to exert power, as is the case for the freewill system, no exertion of power should be expected. God must first fulfill his omniscience.…

    • 2367 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anything that comes close to proving God to exist, or anything on a religious matter is always up for debate. Facts cannot be debated. Saint Augustine went off what he believed and he came up with ideas that made sense to him and to many other people on the matter of God’s foreknowledge, and free will. I can agree with him since this idea’s make sense according to my…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And as stated earlier if God was all-powerful and all-knowing then he knows the best way to connect with us and would have no limitations on doing so. The third objection offers different perspective on how we see Schellenberg’s argument it is still not enough to defeat his argument. The objection relies on the fact that we don’t understand the purpose on why God is hidden to us and so must assume that there is a goal he has for us. Though this kind of thought falls apart when we start to understand that a 3Os God has the power to bypass any limitations within our universe. So given that God would have all loving characteristics and many more then the apparent hiddenness of God would simply not…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    God must be a powerful and all-knowing but also good. Despite that the world is filled with problems and evil things, it is still the best possible world. One can go either way, saying God is either not all-powerful and or all-knowing or infinite goodness, however, if either one is removed then God is being limited, hence saying that God isn't God, therefore, saying that there is no God. There is a God who chose the world with an enormous possible collection of phenomena gathered by the simplest possible laws, a world of balanced order. Leibniz tackles the problem of evil not by disregarding the blemishes of this world.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays