Teleological Argument Analysis

Superior Essays
RS Essay
‘The teleological argument proves that God exists.’ Evaluate this sentence.
The teleological argument or the argument from design, proposed by the philosopher William Paley, is an argument for the existence of God. It is based on the theory of design and Paley uses the analogy of a watch having been designed by a watchmaker and the universe equally having a ‘universe-maker’. Thus, Paley deduces that the skilled designer who could create this complex and intricate universe could only be God. I believe that the teleological argument is a strategic reasoning for the existence of God, however, this reasoning also has many flaws and many of which Paley could not have been aware of in 1800’s, when he proposed the teleological argument. In this essay, I will be justifying my point of view on this statement as well as analysing the other side of the argument and finally coming to a sound conclusion on my opinion in relation to what others may believe.
Paley’s argument is firmly constructed upon the idea of the universe being designed by God. If we look at the universe, numerous aspects of it are strategically designed so that the universe is just right to produce and
…show more content…
Throughout this essay, I have given numerous arguments for the teleological argument and to counter given many arguments that try to disprove the teleological argument. In addition, I have validated each argument with my opinion on how convincing it is in terms of whether it supports the sentence. To conclude, I believe that the teleological argument does prove the existence of God and is a very approachable theory because it seems to be the explanation that is most likely to be true. Regardless, it is an anachronistic argument that perhaps would have been suitable during the time Paley proposed it, but not specifically anymore because it is too outdated to cohere with the scientific theories of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    We as Christians could be wrong, but someone has yet to prove us 100 percent wrong. The cumulative case approach is the idea that not one argument is the ultimate argument for proof of God’s existence. Instead, a collection of all the arguments provides us with the strongest case. The last thing to remember is that the arguments are being used to advocate for a minimalistic version of God. There are so many facets and details about God…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes Existence Of God

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I think that if 'cogito ergo sum ' is the foundation of Descartes ' project in the Meditations, the existence of God is the cornerstone that joins the internal and the external world, making knowledge possible beyond the sole account of the self. Therefore, God 's existence has a major role in the overall argument - it is that which enables the thinker to take the first steps towards the 'unification of sciences '. However, in my opinion, it is not employed correctly, as Descartes, in reasoning for it, relies on rather unsound arguments. I will next present Descartes ' overall argument and how the proof of God 's existence interlocks with the other points of the argument. Then I will introduce the causal and ontological arguments.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anselm's Argument Analysis

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Anselm could have looked for possible flaws in the concepts of existence and the definition of god, but doesn’t seem to question them. He seems to accept them fully as they are, which is bold because he is basing an entire controversial argument through those principles. I feel that Anselm gave god a fabricated definition in which he would have to exist in both facets, otherwise one…

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What are the strengths of the teleological argument? The teleological argument is an a posteriori style of argument, also known as an empirical argument which uses the evidence using observations of the world through the five senses to argue the existence of God. The argument is based on an interpretation of teleology in which purpose or telos appear to exist in nature. The teleological argument suggests that, given this premise, the existence of a designer can be assumed, typically presented as God. Because the design argument needs and looks for the evidence to prove the existence of God, by saying ‘God exists’ it’s a synthetic statement.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    God Is Omniscient

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Assignment #1 In Western culture, the idea that God is an omniscient, omnibenevolent, omnipotent, and a creator is pretty common (Mott, 2017). However, arguments and debated over the existence of God have been controversial for long time. William Paley, a leading philosopher, presented the design argument for the existence of God in his most important work, “Natural Theology” (Rea, 2014). The design argument is the view that the universe must have an intelligent designer as a watch needs a watch designer. David Hume, another famous skeptic philosopher, presented the classic critique of the design argument in his work, “Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion” (Rea, 2014).…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I will be examining the different views pertaining to the cosmological argument for the existence of God as discussed by Bertrand Russell and Fr. Copleston. I will be agreeing with Lord Russell’s views that the cosmological argument has a few inherent problems and contradictions that are difficult to overcome. First, I will look at Russell's assessment on his points of necessary and analytic propositions as well as his belief that Copleston’s argument on contingency is a fallacy of composition. I will then concur with these ideas and offer my thinking as to why this opinion is more convincing than its counterpart.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As philosophers study religion and the validity of religious ideas, it is inevitable that the subject of God will be brought up. Whether or not God exists is a popular discussion that many people have, regardless of their philosophical background. However, philosophers have structured arguments in defense of God to better understand how or why the universe might be reliant on a higher power, and authors, such as Brian Davies and John Hick have written about such arguments for this reason. While speaking about God, philosophers employ cosmological, design, and ontological arguments, in attempt to defend God’s existence. To begin, cosmological arguments use the existence of the world to assert the existence of God.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His argument relies too much on people believing in his definition of God, and it also discredits the ability of humans to formulate ideas of a higher power. Both of these points provide too much doubt to the premises that they critique and thus lead to the conclusion that the argument is unsound. Despite the argument containing its fair share of flaws, the argument is still important. It offers food for thought about the existence of God, and it provides so many opportunities for debate and discussion on the existence of a higher…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being An Atheist Argument

    • 1309 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On Being an Atheist The existence of God is an ongoing argument between the atheist and the Christian. While the atheist needs undeniable proof that there is in fact an intelligent being that is causally necessary for the existence of everything on earth, Christians argue that one hundred percent certainty may not be possible. Foreman offers four ways to approach this argument: the existence of God is the best explanation for certain effects in the world, we may need to offer more than one argument in order to make our case for God’s existence, it is possible that we are wrong and that a defeater could cause us to adjust our argument, and that we are arguing for the characteristics of the being of God and not necessarily the character God…

    • 1309 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper will examine William Lane Craig’s and John Hick’s assertion that the existence of suffering and the concept of a benevolent and omnipotent God are not mutually exclusive, but consistent phenomena. Christian theologians — in their attempt to constitute and defend arguments for the existence of a deity — assert that God, because of his depiction in Biblical literature, has unique characteristics and abilities. These characteristics include benevolence — “the quality of being well-meaning” (Benevolence) — and omnipotence — the ability to hold and wield absolute power. These assigned attributes have created a quandary for many individuals. Is it possible for a God with the aforementioned attributes to simultaneously exist in a world filled with evil?…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays