The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control Laws

Improved Essays
In this paper I will discuss a taboo, gun laws, and how it affects the way we think. Gun laws regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition in the United States. With the gun laws we have they cause violent crimes and need to be changed so that it is easier for Americans to purchase, and protect themselves. There are roughly 270 million firearms in America with 897,000 being carried by police. With that estimate there are 20% gun owners with 65% of the guns. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The states argue the constitution implies the right of the individual to have guns, allowing for state and local governments to adapt gun restrictions. It is our constitutional right to own and carry firearms as a United States citizen, yet if you are seen carrying the community sees it as a taboo and you are …show more content…
“The Kennedy assassination begins the process that culminates in the Gun Control Act of 1968,” says Robert James Spitzer, an American Political Scientist. The whole gun culture changed and sparked the gun debate. Some parties view gun control as the government infringing upon our constitutional right to carry. Others view it as keeping lunatics from purchasing a weapon and going on a killing spree. The only parties I see benefiting from gun control laws are the black market. Criminals most commonly get guns through “straw Purchase” sales. People who perform a straw purchase sale cannot legally own or acquire a firearm, or wants to anonymously, have someone purchase the weapon for them The harder you make it to access something the more valuable it becomes. In turn it makes it more difficult for a recreational gun owner, to purchase a

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The author provides interviews from government officials, historians, activists, and American citizens on both sides of the issue. As gun control has been a worldwide issue for hundreds of years, the author discusses the history of this debate, dating back to the 1100s. He includes infamous stories such as, the robberies and murders by the James Gang in 1876, and the Columbine Shooting in 1999 where two high school students shot and killed 13 people. The author also discusses gun safety, providing accidental shooting and suicide statistics. The book is supplemented with quotes, anecdotes, and discussions from USA Today.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control has been extremely controversial in society for years. In the essay “Just Take Away Their Guns,” James Q. Wilson argues his view on stricter gun control laws. He writes, “Legal restraints on the lawful purchase of guns will have little effect on the illegal use of guns” (Wilson, 1994, p.125). He backs up his statement with the statistics that 5/6 of handguns used in crimes are either stolen or purchased privately. With this being said, he displays that increasing legal restraints on purchasing guns will have little to no effect on the use of guns to commit crimes.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights states clearly that the people’s right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed on. This has led to one of the most complicated and volatile issues in America today. People on both sides of this issue have strong beliefs. Some argue that when our founding fathers wrote the bill of rights, the guns were not as deadly as the ones available today. Supporters of the Second Amendment today argue that people’s right should not be infringed on no matter what.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fundamental rights are granted through the Constitution of the United States, and are a part of our liberty and freedom. Also, The Ninth Amendment reads, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. In other words the right to bear arms should not be taken away from anyone. Opponents of gun control consider the right to bear arms in some sense a fundamental right, and having those rights taken away is unconstitutional. Although the Fourth Amendment protects the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, it doesn’t protect against felons possessing a firearm.…

    • 3270 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Did the framers of the Constitution intend for every U.S. citizen to have the right to bear arms? It is scary to think about what would happen if everyone in a mall had a gun. Under the Second Amendment, American citizens have the right to bear arms and that right should never be violated. Although that is true, gun control is needed because thousands of US citizens are killed every year from the misuse of weapons.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although there are different views of what the Second Amendment really means, the reality is that in the U.S, citizens are allowed to own firearms. With the seemingly recent surge of public shootings over the past few years in places such as Newtown, Connecticut; and Aurora, Colorado,…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment, which is a part of the Bill of Rights, is an important amendment that was written in such a way that over the years people have struggled to come up with the exact way in which it was meant to be interpreted. The Second Amendment states “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” (Pendergast, Pendergast, Sousani 30). During times in our American history we have reached a point where most people were in agreement with how the government handled this amendment and everything surrounding it. Recent violent crime in the U.S. has sparked repeated public calls for stronger federal gun control laws (Pendergast, Pendergast, Sousani 31).…

    • 2106 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Essay On Gun Regulations

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages

    S. Constitution grants this right: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (US Const. amend. II). This has given many Gun owners a sense of security by exercising such a right. For many gun owners, it’s like simple math: having guns gives them a fighting chance in the event an enemy, home invader or a burglar manages to get into private property, and they are able to fight off this intruder.…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment states: “ A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Gun control refers to laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearm. In the United States, 270 million gun distributed throughout, and 22% of Americans own one or more guns. Gun restrictions have always existed, and a majority of Americans supports new restrictions being made also. Others feel that it’s the individual’s right to bear arm and argue that it’s for self defense from growing criminals and to keep them safe from crimes that are “around the corner” from them on the daily.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After American tragedies such as the massacres in public schools and universities, mall shootings, attempted assassinations, and the most recent mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut, brought up a huge debate in America. Should the United States government attempt to put “another” ban on assault rifles and high capacity magazine clips? Lacking a rigid definition, an assault rifle has a set of criteria that includes rapid-fire, and military –style rifles, in which the ban would name specific makes and models as well as magazines that, hold more than ten bullets and exclude them from societal purchase. (Richman). Gun control was designed to prevent crime, however guns don’t kill people, people kill people, and…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 2nd amendment says, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not infringed.” This put into the Bill of Rights by the Founding Fathers. Reason is they were scared that the Federal Government might keep the population if they didn’t have the means to defend themselves together as a nation or as by themselves as individuals. It’s believed that The Founding Fathers thought society were benefited from people having guns in their hands.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My first thought about how to stop gun violence usually is stricter gun control, but the more I think about it the less it seems helpful specially taking into account that in the states with more stricter gun laws the shootings did not decreased, on the contrary those states have more gun violence than the ones with less strict gun policy, but the fact is that the perpetrators of gun violence often obtain their weapons legally , so our focus should be in how to identify those are not qualified, physical or mentally, to carry a gun. Since people will always reserve their right to the second amendment when there is talk about gun control it will be a difficult task to sell guns only to the “right” people, most people won’t want to purchase guns…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibited the sale of guns to several types of individuals consisting of minors, people with criminal records, disabled, illegal aliens, dishonorably discharged military personnel and others. In 1993 the Act was changed by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act. This Act said that background checks for all unlicensed carriers had to be done before they could purchase any firearms from a licensed dealer. However, there has been discussion that there is a “gun show loophole” in the Firearms Owners Protection Act of 1986 which allows all people, including convicted felons, the ability to purchase guns without a background check. While many people have decidedly formed opinions on gun control, the debate is complicated…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nationwide there are a multitude of stores, both legal and illegal, that one can purchase a gun from. People have the ability to have them shipped overseas, or buy them from the downtown pawn shop. Even with certain restrictions in place to exclude people with a criminal background, many people are able to buy guns through shops who don 't enforce these restrictions very well. People use guns for recreational activities such as hunting and shooting at a range. They also use guns for protection purposes in their household or in their businesses.…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cook and Jens Ludwig refer to previous studies to investigate the impacts of gun ownership in our economic system. They provided proof that high gun ownership correlates with gun misuse. They then broke down all homicide data in the 200 largest counties in America, which accounts for nearly 75% of homicides in America. They found that homicide rates are higher with perceived illegal gun purchases as opposed to legal gun purchases. The authors also discuss the social cost of gun violence, showing that every additional 10,000 gun owners lead to six additional acts of gun-related violence (Cook & Ludwig,…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics