The colors that make up the mural have certain meanings, like the top of the mural, which is red with some yellow. This represents a beautiful sunset and/or sunrise, which obviously gives a relaxed and euphoric mood. Los Angeles is a city that can boast a lot of beautiful sunsets/sunrises, so that tells us that life in Los Angeles is a beautiful thing. The bottom of the mural shows us some blue, triangularly shaped objects. These objects are most likely the San Gabriel Mountains that lay in the background in every iconic LA image, or it can represent the waves of the Pacific Ocean along our iconic beaches. In 2009, Romero sued Caltrans for covering the iconic mural that he made back in 1984. It was covered some time after 2007, without any consent, so that angered Romero to the point where he needed to file a lawsuit. However, it was not Caltrans that had the entire blame. IT turns out that after years after graffiti tagging, this mural, plus dozens of other murals were attempted to be restored, but vandals kept coming and covering everything up, so Caltrans stepped in and covered the mural with anti-graffiti paint so that taggers wouldn 't be able to tag on it again, but that still didn 't bode well with Romero since he and all the people of LA thought that we should be able to witness the evocative imagery of these meaningful murals. Romero wanted to keep expressing his love for the …show more content…
It seemed like as if LA was pressured to make a split second decision by considering the amount of tagging that had occurred on it. I also think that since they were so concerned with the taggers, they completely forgot about the what this mural stood for, so now they were put on the spot. If I was facing this situation as the artist of the mural, I would be infuriated because the city of Los Angeles doesn 't even appear to show some interest towards the mural. I would also persuade the city to recognize what this mural means to everyone, so that they can realize what really counts when it comes to the