There are sources in the world that research the decrease or increase of their nation’s economic growth. There are different aspects and opinions to the level of economic inequality and immobility. There are sources that contradict each other’s proof on this issue due to the evidence that each source contained from each other. The views of this argument to the sources is that to see which argument is superior to the other and I found that Surowicki argument is superior to Obama’s speech because it finds all the loop holes in Obama’s speech. The things that I see that in Surowiecki argument is that she stating that the economic mobility has not changed at all due to valid research.
Surowiecki’s argument is contradicting Obama’s source about
Surowiecki’s argument is contradicting Obama’s source about