During the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention, it was familiar that Articles of Confederation was successful in the unification of the colonies after the commotion of the American Revolution. Although the AOC was a huge step to the becoming of this nation, it wasn’t sufficient enough to run the newly-independent country. In force, the constitutional Convection didn’t just revise the Articles, but also wrote the Constitution which was drastically and extremely different from the Articles. On November 15th 1777, the founding fathers adopted the Articles of Confederation which established a confederate-style government with a weak central branch.…
I Casey Nichols representative of North Carolina fully support the long overdue ratification of the Constitution. The Articles Of Confederation are impuissant and short-lived. An continued absence of a new document that conclusively clarifies our affairs will inevitably lead us to defeat. It was unquestionably imperative that we held the constitutional convention. The rationale is quite evident considering all the affairs we don't have elucidations for.…
The Constitutional Convention took place on May 14, 1787. In the Convention 55 individuals all responded except for New Hampshire that didn't show up until July, and Rhode Island didn’t show up at all. In the existing Constitution the Articles of Confederation weren’t working, there was no chief executive, no court system, not even a way for the central government to force a state to pay taxes. Tyranny is the thought that absolute power is in the hands of one individual- like a dictator or king. They wanted to see how the Constitution guarded against tyranny.…
First Short Essay One thing was clear during the convention of 1787, there were an astonishing number of viewpoints that clashed wherever they could. The main topic for debate was the distribution of control. Who would make the decisions for the people the state government or national government? The worry was that if the state government had primary control over the people's interests, who would police them? The Federalists wanted to make sure that the state government officials did not influence political policy to further their own interests.…
This compromise settled fears by Northern delegates of the South being overrepresented in the House of Representatives, but it made the Southern delegates nervous. They feared that giving Congress power over commerce would create disproportionate taxation on slaves or lead to the omission of them altogether. They were also afraid of navigation acts, which led to them asking for navigation and commercial laws to need a two-thirds vote in Congress to pass.…
Congress decided their current form of government, the Articles of Confederation, had many flaws. It was too weak to stop things such as Shay’s Rebellion. Because of this they organized a convention, many state representatives showed up, but some did not because they were pleased with how it was and didn’t want to change this. The people who were against changing the Articles of Confederation are called Anti-Federalists, and people that were for this are called Federalists. As a Federalist I believe the people of the United States should ratify the Constitution because we would fall to pieces without it.…
From their conception and drafting in 1776, the Articles of Confederation were nothing but a reaction to the English government. When possible, the colonists continually strived to do the exact opposite of what the English government would. This effort to avoid tyranny resulted in a decentralized, weak, inefficient, and financially poor government, one that was also nigh impossible to change and amend. Not only did this later spur reform, but it also gave impetus to “those who favored a strong central government” (persons such as Alexander Hamilton).…
The United States constitution was signed and approved by the constitutional convention delegates in 1787, and it needed ratification from nine states as it is required in article VII of the constitution before it could be enforced. States that decided not to ratify the constitution will be considered a different country, and not part of the union. With this knowledge, the urge of the ratification led to a conflict among the delegates that resulted in numerous documents, essays, pamphlets, and articles. The conflict; perhaps debate consists of two opposing sides; the Federalists who wanted the ratification of the constitution, and the Anti-Federalists objected to the ratification. The Federalists led by Alexander Hamilton were in favor of…
The Constitutional Convention After the United States won the revolutionary war, they continued to function under the Articles of Confederation for about four years. Under the Articles, the government had very little power over the states and was not able to solve many domestic or foreign problems. A change needed to happen, so Congress called upon all 13 states to send representatives to Philadelphia. Although Rhode Island refused to send delegates, the other 12 states sent fifty-five men in total, to what would soon be called the Constitutional Convention. Many leaders of the American Revolution were not present; Thomas Jefferson, John and Samuel Adams, John Hancock, Thomas Paine, and Patrick Henry were all absent.…
In James Madison’s Federalist 49, written in 1788, he lays out his argument for why constitutional revision should be limited. He believes that, in response to Thomas Jefferson’s idea of frequent revision that being every 19-20 years, that this recurrent change to the constitution would ultimately lead to the people’s intolerance of the government in the sense that they would begin to believe that it was defective and could not be fixed. In the eyes…
As the Revolution came near the end, Americans decided there needed to be a set of laws in place, for the independence that will be gained if they win the war. The first set of rules to be drafted is known as the Articles of Confederation. Seeing that it was America’s first attempt at a government, it is quite obvious that there were many issues with the rules and provisions created, which caused problems in the new nation and stress among political leaders. The Articles of Confederation caused economic, legislative and leadership problems, along with unrest in the Anti-Federalist Party as shown in Documents A, spoken by Melancton Smith and Document B written by Brutus 1.…
In 1787 the weak form of government brought together by the Articles of Confederation was not doing its justice for the colonists. In the Article of Confederation, there was only one branch of government, and that one branch had no power over the states. This soon proved itself to be ineffective to be a national government for the people. To remedy this problem the Founding Fathers got together at the Philadelphia Convention to discuss a new plan for the government. The Founding Fathers decided not to revise the Articles of Confederation, but to create a completely new constitution.…
Because of the group’s disagreements, they came to write explanations for their position in essay. These essays came to be known as The Federalist Papers and The Anti-federalist Papers. The Federalist papers had a main reason to convey the interpretation to the new constitution. While the Anti-Federalist Papers was pleading those who still secured their rights to allow discussion over the same document. By reading them, we learn that the Anti-Federalist did not think the new Constitution accurately explained the rights of its…
In the argument about the ratification of the United States Constitution, both the supporters and the opponents had substantial reasoning for their viewpoints. However, these groups differentiated greatly on what problems were most significant to their arguments. Each group came up with smaller “subgroups” of issues they had with the Constitution or Articles of Confederation. The supporting group of the Constitution was the Federalists, who believed in a strong central government that would better protect and support the new upcoming nation.…
The History of the Constitutional Convention In 1787, Congress realized that states governing themselves would leave the nation powerless when faced with another war. The United States had adopted the Articles of Confederation a decade prior, but the system wasn’t working. Each state was able to govern itself, and they didn’t have to abide by any regulations set by the federal government. The United States has a federalist government, meaning that the citizens are held to the laws of the state and the nation, but the federal government was left nearly powerless to enforce any type of authority. Congress had no way of being able to regulate commerce and no authority to emplace taxes.…