Girish Karnad has a different approach towards folklore, history and different great characters. Through his works he has secured a position of respect in the historical backdrop of Indian English show. His topic determination, plot development, character advancement, exchange conveyance and phrasing all demonstrate him a man of astonishing judgment and learning. In this way, one might say that Girish Karnad is the upper most branch of the unceasing tree of Indian Drama in English.
Iroskumar B. Vaja in his thesis entitled “Myths In Girish Karnads Plays A Critical Study” highlights Karnad's most prominent accomplishment as a writer is his specialty of changing over the old and out dated stories in current setting.It can be said for beyond any …show more content…
Yayati-myth is additionally used to concentrate on the issue of patriarchy in the Indian culture. It attracts our regard for the issue of the unequal power relationship particularly in the joint family. The issue of patriarchy progresses toward becoming prominent at the presentation of another character, Chitralekha as Puru's spouse. She opposes limitations constrained upon her. In Hayavadana Karnad utilizes folktale to toss light on the built up social set of principles. In the Indian setting it is taken for allowed that a lady will keep all affection and unwaveringness for her better half and safeguard herself from any sort of outside fascination. Be that as it may, in the play this regular idea of a lady is flipped around. The woman in the first story is told that one specific blend of head furthermore, body is her better half and she looks no further – the story closes there. In any case, with regards to the play this sort of arrangement doesn't work. Karnad's historical play Tale-Danda likewise highlights the position of women in the patriarchy. But Gangambika, Basavanna's spouse, all women characters are given optional treatment. The Lord Bijjala holds his significant other, Rambhavati in charge of the idiocy and carelessness of
Iroskumar B. Vaja in his thesis entitled “Myths In Girish Karnads Plays A Critical Study” highlights Karnad's most prominent accomplishment as a writer is his specialty of changing over the old and out dated stories in current setting.It can be said for beyond any …show more content…
Yayati-myth is additionally used to concentrate on the issue of patriarchy in the Indian culture. It attracts our regard for the issue of the unequal power relationship particularly in the joint family. The issue of patriarchy progresses toward becoming prominent at the presentation of another character, Chitralekha as Puru's spouse. She opposes limitations constrained upon her. In Hayavadana Karnad utilizes folktale to toss light on the built up social set of principles. In the Indian setting it is taken for allowed that a lady will keep all affection and unwaveringness for her better half and safeguard herself from any sort of outside fascination. Be that as it may, in the play this regular idea of a lady is flipped around. The woman in the first story is told that one specific blend of head furthermore, body is her better half and she looks no further – the story closes there. In any case, with regards to the play this sort of arrangement doesn't work. Karnad's historical play Tale-Danda likewise highlights the position of women in the patriarchy. But Gangambika, Basavanna's spouse, all women characters are given optional treatment. The Lord Bijjala holds his significant other, Rambhavati in charge of the idiocy and carelessness of