Procedural And Substantive Law Analysis

Improved Essays
Together, substantive and procedural laws work to ensure that a trial is fair and free of improper procedures. Substantive laws determine what is to be considered a crime. They not only tell if a crime committed by an individual is indeed considered a criminal offense but also how severe the crime may be. Moreover, procedural laws determine how people who commit crime should be handled in court. It gives them a fair trial and protects their rights as citizens. Both laws are need in law and are very important. They may vary depending on the type of court, state or jurisdiction.

Substantive and procedural laws are laws that work together within the criminal justice system. Substantive laws depend on procedural law guidelines that
…show more content…
Substantial laws tell if a crime committed by an individual is indeed considered a criminal offense and how severe the crime may be. Furthermore, these laws are what tells if hate crimes are indeed hate crimes or if self-defense crimes are indeed self-defense. Certain elements must be present to consider a crime. It is possible for a suspect to be free to go in court because the jury may decide that the accused did not commit a crime if certain elements are not present. According to (Fuller, 2014), the “thou shall nots” of the criminal law, substantive laws are found in the criminal codes of the state and federal governments and are the result of generations of political and social development. These laws are used to regulate the relationship of people and the state and help keep the rights, obligations and power under control. Some examples of substantive laws include homicide, rape, torts, wills, and so on. The substantive law also sets the parameters on the punishment for each type of offense (Fuller, 2014). These laws may differ based on the state and/or …show more content…
Substantive law is more important because without those laws an officer wouldn’t necessarily know if an act committed is considered a crime. Without those laws, he could possibly arrest someone who is not committing what is considered a crime. This could then cause unnecessary court costs which will lead to the accused being free if the jury indeed finds what the officer thought was a crime, not actually a crime. Certainly no one will be able to bring a lawsuit against a police officer (or a department) for stopping people who violate what the officer (or department) “reasonably” believes is the law (Colb, 2014). However, it does affect the agency and gives an impression of unprofessional

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Then this amendment goes a little further by saying it also provides the due process under the law and equally provides all the rights of the Constitution despite a person race, sexuality, religious beliefs, and creed. I believe this concept to be significant because equality a form of democracy. Therefore this notion counters the behavioral aspect of logic as to why an individual commits a particular type of crime. The due process serves as a method for “aiding the innocent and convicting those that are guilty of these criminal activities holding them accountable for their actions in regards to…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Without Due Process, these individuals (the accused) would serve time in jail without having the opportunity to defend themselves and prove their innocence or provide any witnesses, testimonies, and evidence on their behalf. Due Process also gives the defendant a clear notification of what their charge(s) are. Due Process is what makes Americans have the right to life, liberty, or property without due procedure of law. Due Process is what keeps a checks and balances in the justice system in order to ensure that the accused are treated fairly and not automatically assumed to be guilty. Due Process establishes the right to procedural due process as well as substantive due process.…

    • 1926 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another important aspect of the legal accountability of police is judicial examination in the courts. This operates when judges and defence lawyers examine the quality and sources of police evidence. Evidence illegally such as through an illegal search or illegal telephone intercept is usually subject to the exclusionary rule as a deterrent to illegal conduct. The courts should also be alert for possible fabrications of evidence false evidence and the suppression of exculpatory evidence. Finally, a free Press is essential to police accountability.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Due Process Clause

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The due process clause is the basis for many of the rights afforded to defendants and there are procedures followed in a criminal case. The due process law terms are interpreted to mean that criminal procedures are supposed be fair and just. There are two due process laws one is a procedural due process law. The procedural due process means the defendant can be punished and they must be given an opportunity to contest the charges against them and to be tried by a fair and impartial judge. The second is called subjective due process that means that the punishment must fit the crime.…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Crime Control Model

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The due process model is able to maintain the reliable fact-finding techniques, it also can incorporate prophylactic and deterrent mechanisms. However, the release of the factually guilty and even blotting of the illegality might be existent in cases, thus it would still have evidence in identifying the adjudicative accused person’s guilty by fact-finders. Consequently, it is necessary to produce adequate pressure by penalizing errant police and prosecutors within criminal processes, the finding of facts is not only the factor to convict a person’s guilty, but also necessarily by appropriate legal…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This means that the officer should not start with exerting violence to the suspected party. Precisely, the officer should judge the situation not by the look of the case but the truth of the situation. It is factual that not every scenario of domestic violence calls for detention of the offender. In some cases, the offender might be warned on the consequences of committing the offense again. Thus, the officer should consider the applicable law enforcement strategy to solve the dispute in this case.…

    • 1615 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to the article The Criminal Justice System, “The criminal justice system is the set of agencies and processes established by governments to control crime and impose penalties on those who violate laws” (The Criminal Justice System). Within the criminal justice system, there are two very important systems known as state and federal systems that deal with crimes depending on the boundaries of where it occurred. So there is an idea behind the criminal justice system and that is to make society a safer place for everyone and prevent crimes. Again, the criminal justice system is consisted of the law enforcement, corrections, and the courts. If the criminal justice system is established to prevent crimes and to bring justice among victims of the offenders, who exactly is preventing the crimes from happening?…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Law Vs Criminal Law

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Criminal law is used for maintaining stability for the society and state through punishing offenders as well as deterring them and others from being offended. For criminal justice system, the jury should agree unanimously before the conviction of the defendant. Appeals and Commencement of Proceedings In civil law, the appeal is done by the either party (defendant or claimant) to the decision of the court. Summons or indictment is used for state or people or prosecution. In case of criminal law, the defendant is allowed to appeal a verdict of the court and the prosecution is not allowed to appeal.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constitution and generally understood to mean the due course of legal proceedings according to the rules and forms established for the protection of individual rights. In criminal proceedings, due process of law is generally understood to include the following basic elements: a law creating and defining the offense, an impartial tribunal having jurisdictional authority over the case, accusation in proper form, notice and opportunity to defend, trial according to established procedure, and discharge from all restraints obligations unless convicted. The criminal justice system has two models crime control model and due process model. The crime control model values the arrest and conviction of criminal offenders. Due process is intended to ensure that innocent is not convicted of crimes.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They both originate from a dispute between two parties, they both have pretrial procedures, they both have discovery processes, and they are both brought before a judge and jury. The major differences between them is the requirement for more stringent efforts to prove a violation occurred in criminal cases, the discovery requirements, and the burden of proof required to establish guilt. The reason for this, is if found guilty of a criminal matter certain rights are taken away from the guilty party. For example, their freedom when incarcerated, right to vote, right to possess firearm, and the social stigmas associated with being a convicted…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays