Why Is Sovereignty Necessarily Absolute

Great Essays
Is sovereignty necessarily absolute?

Sovereignty is a term used to describe the uncontrolled power through which an independent state is governed (Krasner, 2001). Sovereignty also calls for the supreme political will and authority that a state has in its administration and the control of the constitution (Krasner, 2001). In other words, Sovereignty provides the states with the power to do just about anything that pleases the states without being accountable to different nations. For example, Sovereignty allows the states to make laws and enforce such laws. However, given the increasing global dynamics and the interconnectivity of states, it is more or less impossible for a country to have absolute sovereignty. While other countries are not likely to intervene in the affairs of another country, the conducts of a state should be consistent with the established international laws (Krasner, 2001). This implies in exercising the free will of a country, a country must ensure that its activities do not impact or infringe on the free will of another country. In other words,
…show more content…
This mean sovereignty is not absolute because it has to consider the two aspects of freedom and impacts of the actions of states. It is the freedom that gives the states the ability to act in accordance with their will. Without the freedom, the wills of the states will be obstructed and they will not be able to achieve their will. At the same time, however, the wills of the states must not result into diverse impacts on the rest of the world. In other words, the freedom to act in accordance to a state’s will ought not restrict other states from the freedom to act in their own will (Kegley and Wittkopf, 2005). This means the enjoyments of states’ sovereignty must be within the confines of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Sovereignty now rests firmly in the hands of national government. Under the sub title “The Rise of Modern Federalism”, on page 47 it begins to explain how modern federalism became more…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In an interview with an opponent of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, an individual voices her opinions about what sovereignty means to them in our modern society. She believes it is “an imagination [the…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the history of the United States, her ideas of expansion were altered. According to certain views, expansionism did not change in the late nineteenth-century to the early twentieth-century while others viewed expansionism to have stayed the same. Foreign countries continued to broaden their horizons and colonize other places, and as the United States grew in power, it began to act likewise. An old concept idealised by the American people was Manifest Destiny.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    States may not make treaties with other countries or with other states, issue money, levy duties on imports or exports, maintain a standing army or navy, or make war. (Paletz, Owen and Cook 86). Concurrent power, which federal and state governments share are taxing and borrowing money, regulating elections, and establishing courts. Even with this distribution between federal and state governments, the national government has multiple responsibilities to the states, they cannot deny the equal representation of any state in the Senate, state’s borders can’t altered without the consent of the state, defend any state should they request it, and guarantee each state “a republican form of government” (Paletz, Owen and Cook…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    "If other states were to claim the broad-based authority that the United States does—to kill people anywhere, anytime—the result would be chaos." —Philip Alston, former UN special rapporteur…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “….as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    citizens since this directly affects our way of life. The two positions argue whether or not the idea of states ' rights is relevant today. Both viewpoints have valid claims warranting consideration; for example, evidence indicates that states should have the right to decide certain issues for themselves. In contrast, opposing evidence suggests that federalism ensures the unity of all states. While both sides of the issue have valid points, the claim that states ' rights is no longer relevant is the stronger position, the position supported by the preponderance of the evidence cited in the passages.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Need to Fall Back Boom! A bomb detonates five feet away from you. Dust and debris fly all over the place. Bullets start raining in, shattering glass, and causing damage. The rain of bullets just landed in the back of everyone around you.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American is a person born, raised, or living in the United States. Living in the united States means you are eligible to work, own whatever you buy, go as you please, have say in the debates, elections, and much more. To me, being an American means to be free. I can be independent about who I am as a person, or what I do. Sovereignty is to be an American, Although we are free, we still have to comply with the law.…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Revolutionary Era During the time of the Revolutionary wars within America, France, and Haiti, there are differing opinions of independence. By evaluating each source given, the variations are evident. In terms of these revolutions, each county’s idea of liberty has several different meanings. For example, the United States discusses that all are entitled to certain unalienable rights, among them are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Whereas, the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen in France, states that men are born free and equal in rights.…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Absolutism Vs Monarchy

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The popular idea of popular sovereignty is that the people of rights and freedom. The Declaration of Independence states, “that all men are created equal” and have “certain unalienable Rights.” Among these rights are “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.” When the government becomes “destructive of these ends” the people have the right to either modify or eliminate it. The Declaration of Independence was written to abolish the British Crown’s rule over the thirteen colonies and create new government for the United States of…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The international community is characterized as an anarchy- no world government ruling. Nation states seek for power and security because this ideology of “self-help” exists; in a world where you cannot trust anyone and where your friends today can be your enemy tomorrow states do not want to be interdependent. Since many states want to be independent and be viewed as a strong…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The sovereign only has authority over things which concern the public good, and with this, their authority is absolute. The general will is explained through the general laws of the state, made by an impartial non-citizen lawmaker. All of these laws must ensure liberty and equality.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism And The Cold War

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    (Waltz 2000), there is no way to guarantee lasting peace so states must be sure to protect themselves even if that will result in war. Hence, the need to protect the states sovereignty does inevitably result in war; war is a tool to ensure power and security and as such will always…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are here any limits on the principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty? In answering this question, I will first set out a traditional definition of Parliamentary sovereignty. I will then consider two different senses in which it might be said that there are limits on Parliament’s sovereignty.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays