Why Is Sovereignty Necessarily Absolute

1678 Words 7 Pages
Is sovereignty necessarily absolute?

Sovereignty is a term used to describe the uncontrolled power through which an independent state is governed (Krasner, 2001). Sovereignty also calls for the supreme political will and authority that a state has in its administration and the control of the constitution (Krasner, 2001). In other words, Sovereignty provides the states with the power to do just about anything that pleases the states without being accountable to different nations. For example, Sovereignty allows the states to make laws and enforce such laws. However, given the increasing global dynamics and the interconnectivity of states, it is more or less impossible for a country to have absolute sovereignty. While other countries are not likely to intervene in the affairs of another country, the conducts of a state should be consistent with the established international laws (Krasner, 2001). This implies in exercising the free will of a country, a country must ensure that its activities do not impact or infringe on the free will of another country. In other words,
…show more content…
This mean sovereignty is not absolute because it has to consider the two aspects of freedom and impacts of the actions of states. It is the freedom that gives the states the ability to act in accordance with their will. Without the freedom, the wills of the states will be obstructed and they will not be able to achieve their will. At the same time, however, the wills of the states must not result into diverse impacts on the rest of the world. In other words, the freedom to act in accordance to a state’s will ought not restrict other states from the freedom to act in their own will (Kegley and Wittkopf, 2005). This means the enjoyments of states’ sovereignty must be within the confines of the

Related Documents