Source B Peter Singer Analysis

Decent Essays
The question, to what extent of responsibility each human has, on this planet, to help those less fortunate, is not easily answered. Its important to consider that each individual in the world has different morals. We were taught various values that make us who we are today. Therefore, to lump all humans together as having an equal responsibility to assist those in need, is not feasibly possible. No matter how we feel, some people will always give more than they are accountable, and others will not give at all. There is nothing that will change the fact that certain people are just more generous and giving, both monetarily and practically.
In Source B, Peter Singer states that there is a set amount, percentage, or proportion that one must donate

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Psy 230 Week 2 Case 2

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Cordes, O’Hare and Steuerle the table above represented the change that occurred in tax revenue and charitable giving based on four options. In option one, if all non-itemizers were allowed to deduct their charitable contributions starting from the first dollar given the results support previous claims that the increase in giving to charities does not outweigh the cost of tax revenue (3). Option two took a different approach and proposed to add a floor of $500 to those non-itemizers who file jointly and $250 for those who file single. In order to take a deduction, the contribution had to be in excess of the floor set for the individual. By limiting the deduction, it is seen that the revenue cost became lower while the amount of extra giving that was encouraged did not significantly increase considering the floor provided the subsidy to extra giving rather than giving that would have occurred without any incentive (Cordes, O’Hare & Steuerle 4).…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He reasons that everyone on the planet does not have an equal entitlement on the resources of others, that we are bound to a greater duty to our family and circle, who have a greater right. By providing for and ensuring happiness to our immediate needs from all others that may claim to our resources, is, in fact, a more efficient means to achieve happiness. Singer counters that although pockets within these first world nations can experience poverty relative to others within their population, these developing nations face absolute poverty, where life is plagued by hardships including death, disease, squalid living conditions and overall despair. Where industrialized nations possess a prosperity and capacity to provide assistance to third world nations, Singer suggests that a donation of one-tenth of their wage would not only lessen the destitution of their fellow man but could be achieved without cost to their own particular well-being and wealth. As this act would maximize the utility or happiness for the greatest number of world citizens and therefore have an ethical obligation to do…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Why Is Peter Singer Wrong

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Australian philosopher Peter Singer, believes that when we refuse to help end world hunger, we become murders. He believes that it is are moral obligation as Americans who live comfortable lives, to help “the worlds poor” (Singer 1). It is wrong to continue to live a luxurious life, when we know that others are fighting for the mere chance to survive. In Peter Singer’s “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” he compares us Americans to two fictitious characters Dora and Bob, due to the fact that we, as Dora and Bob, chose luxuries over the chance to help people suffering from life-threatening poverty. Peter Singer compares us to a fictitious character from a Brazilian film called “Central Stations.”…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Madison is a successful businesswoman who has become convinced that she ought to give a substantial amount of her earnings to help those in extreme poverty in the developing world. Her brother, Thomas, a local college student, is not persuaded that such donations are a good idea. “It just makes people ask for more handouts later,” he says. “And besides,” he adds, “there are a lot of poor people here in our city: homeless people living on the streets. And I’m not doing too well myself.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Often times, articles and advertisements that encourage people to donate always appear to be faulting people for have enough. Like Peter Singer stated in his article “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”: “In the world as it is now, I can see no escape from the conclusion that each one of us with wealth surplus to his or her essential needs should be giving most of it to help people suffering from poverty so dire as to be life-threatening. That 's right: I 'm saying that you shouldn 't buy that new car, take that cruise, redecorate the house or get that pricey new suit. After all, a $1,000 suit could save five children 's lives” (329).…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer’s essay “What Should a Billionaire Give” discusses the harsh truth of global poverty that many individuals suffer through due to living in a developing country. In his essay, he tells the story of Bill and Melinda Gates making the decision to take it upon themselves and donate to those in need via the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. For any human, it is his or her civic obligation to care about the needs of others, whether the needs are physiological or based on safety. In order to provide for the basic needs of the poor, it is vital to understand how individuals respond to poverty, how war affects poverty, and how poverty can be related to psychology.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Response To Peter Singer

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages

    ` The world is not a pretty place and is hardly fair. It would drive one mad simply listing all the things wrong and all the injustices incurred at any one moment. The most insulting part of this whole situation is that almost all of these catastrophes can be prevented. The world is home to genocides, famines, war, orphans, and homelessness, all while also harboring food wastage, one dollar sandwiches, and private jets. It is human nature to try to right perceived injustices, and there clearly are many.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Makes the World Go Round Professor of Bioethics, Peter Singer, explains in the article “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” that all prosperous people should give all money that is not needed for basic necessities to places that are in need of food and medicine. As an American, I have knowledge this argument would shake up America as a whole. This could create a world of giving up the Capitalistic ways of America and the economic food chain. On the other hand, it could create a world of kindness and less violence. Can you imagine giving up your freedom to help others?…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Moral Theory By Rachels

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There is, after all, more than a single person in world, and so long as that remains true, it is our duty to help one other. We are to feel compassion towards our neighbor and be a good Samaritan (Luke 10). It is our conscientious duty to help one another when the need is there. It always has been, is and will be that way until we leave this beautiful planet behind as a species. This provides the best outcome for the most amount of people.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While walking down the side of the road, you come across a person who seems to have tattered clothing, an unbathed demeanor, holding a sign that says “Anything Helps”. Does one have a moral obligation to help this person, or is it out of our scope of moral obligation? This difference between moral obligation differs between Utilitarianism and the Kantian approach. According to the Utilitarian theory of moral obligation, their duty is to do what will bring the most good and resolve the most amount of pain. Simply put, whatever would bring the most amount of happiness to the most amount of people is morally good.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is a human life worth? Some may say it is worth millions of dollars no matter what. Others might argue that a human’s worth is dependant on who they are, where they came from and what they can do. In Peter Singer’s Article “What Should a Billionaire Give?” he states that many people would be reluctant to even consider putting a fixed rate. It would be unethical to do so, however, he continues with “If we really had to, most of us would agree that the value of human life would be in the millions.”…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, the large amounts of money being donated may not even impact the individuals you are attempting to help. Being able to hold on to most of your money means that you know where it is going towards and you have the option to use it more efficiently…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Would you help total strangers even if it could bring harm to your own family? If we continue to help and give our resources the poor countries, eventually our lifeboat will sink. In this fast changing world, we have no time to spare on our empathy, as the United States we need to realize that we have to put the U.S. citizens before any others. I 'm not saying that we should abandon poor countries in their time of need, but rather than give the poor countries our resources we worked hard to acquire, we can export skills and advice. Will helping poor countries with them just keep taking, be a never-ending cycle that will end up with our demise?…

    • 2096 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    THE EXISTENSE OF MORAL DUTY TO FEED THE HUNGRY When it comes to matters regarding the moral obligation of one feeding the starved, I am of the notion that they should be helped as it is one of the fundamental principles that make us human. However, this raises the issues to what extent should an individual help a stranger and does it imply that certain individuals in society bear a more obligatory duty than others. It also causes one to question his or her moral duties to others and the parameters or boundaries of those obligations. Despite drought, poverty and poor health tend to be common in a good portion of the developing world, which in turn implies there is no moral duty and that this hardship condition are not a problem of fairness,…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Infinity Concept Of Life

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The concept of infinity is the closest thing that resembles how complicated life is. Take away one from infinity and you still have infinity; take away a complication from life and life is still complicated. One of those many complicated factors in life is responsibility, which is just another part of life that does not have a simple explanation. The complex nature of responsibility makes it difficult for me to give an absolute answer on what I perceive to be my responsibility, for all I can do is hope that how I live my life is the best way to deal with my responsibilities.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays