Socrates Recollection Argument

Improved Essays
The second argument is the Theory of Recollection, this theory states that we can be reminded of one thing by being made conscious of another thing. Socrates brings up the Theory of Forms, as Socrates had stated earlier on in this dialogue the Form can only be understood by reason or in other words the soul and not our senses like vision or hearing that are associated with our bodies. For us to look at two equal sticks and know they are equal we “must have had some prior knowledge” of the Form of Equality which can only be acquired from the soul(74e). So for example for us to already have the knowledge of equality when we are born, and later on in ife be able to recollect when forced to, means that the soul existed before it embodied us. Socrates

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Secondly, Socrates shows that perception is private and unique by appealing to the fact that perception differs from person to person. Lastly, Socrates appeals to the fact that perception is private and unique by appealing to the fact that an individual can perceive the same exact object in two different ways on two different occasions. On these grounds, it necessarily follows that the properties that can be abstracted from an object, without impacting the essence of said object, properties such as size, warmth, and color, neither exist in the perceived object, nor in the individual perceiving the object. This is what Socrates means when he says that “things such as size or warmth or whiteness belong neither to the object we measure ourselves against of touch or to we who are doing the measuring or touching”…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato uses Socrates belief in the soul 's immortality to prove the necessity of the theory of recollection in the fulfillment of true knowledge. Thus, Plato develops the idea of the soul 's repeated reincarnation and suggests that the soul 's learning is forgotten by the event of birth in a new body, and the growth of knowledge within the mind during a lifetime is simply the recollection of knowledge from the soul. Meno is always questioning Socrates and his questions then leads to further discussion that proof recollection. Socrates instructs Meno to" pay attention then whether you think he is recollecting or learning from me"(82b). Socrates question Meno 's attendant on the area of a square figure with four sides that are equal.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pain and Gain: The Relationship between the Philosopher and the City In 1920, Warren G. Harding won the presidential election with the slogan “Return to Normalcy” (“Presidential Campaign Slogans” 1). Although referring to returning to the life style before the horrid World War I, Harding’s campaign highlights an interesting point: People resist change. In the Apology of Socrates, Socrates strongly challenges the city through philosophy, but in Crito, he submits to the laws of the city because it is ultimately the just thing to do. Because Socrates challenges the laws, he is sentenced to death, so it is not easy for Socrates to be a philosopher. In addition, Athens has a difficult reaction to philosophy.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socrates starts to examine the second argument after examining the first argument. Crito stated that it is unjust for Socrates to stay in the prison with having an opportunity to escaping the prison. In respond, Socrates said: “We should examine whether or not it would be just for me to try to get out of here when the Athenians haven’t acquitted me.” (67) Socrates strategy in any argument is examining and questioning, and he would look for any contradiction in the argument. Socrates explained that justice person should never do injustice in any circumstances (68).…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will argue that Socrates argument that the tyrant will be unhappy is convincing. First, I will explain how the tyrant exemplifies injustice. Then I will explain the consequences for the tyrant of his soul. Then I will analyze Socrates argument to develop a clear and evaluation that supports my thesis.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “He will require to grow accustomed to the sight of the upper world. And first he will see the shadows best, next the reflections of men and other objects in the water, and then the objects themselves.” (Pg. 869; 21) Given what Socrates is saying, to me it rings parallels of life and death, learned and unlearned. From the start of life there is a shadow in our mind, but until we learn through our senses the shape of a vase, we then understand it then we label it so mentally, as we can then call it that. It shows how in our mind, there is a blank canvas of gray matter and until we become accustomed to sights and senses we can then categorize each accordingly allowing our world be colorful with detailing objects all around…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First Argument Analysis Essay As Plato explains in his dialogue, Crito, Socrates is in prison on a death-sentence. While in prison, Crito, a friend of Socrates tries to convince him to escape prison and to escape the punishments. While Socrates listens to Crito’s side of the issue, he comes up with a moral argument for why it would be best to stay and accept the punishment of his sentence. In this paper, I will be proving that this argument is sound. Socrates’ main argument goes as follows.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the dialogue Euthyphro, Socrates inquires into the nature of piety and goodness by questioning Euthyphro, whom Socrates deems to be somewhat of an expert on moral matters. Euthyphro defines piety as being that which the gods love. Socrates argues that this definition brings about a dilemma (named the Euthyphro dilemma) that Socrates believes has only two options, both of which challenge the common role that god and religion play in relation to morality. I will argue that perhaps these two options do not require that one completely reject the possibility that morality comes from god. One has the possibility of accepting his first option, although it also requires accepting that god’s actions are arbitrary.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Argument Essay

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There's not really a moment in time where I'm not evaluating my views: politically and philosophically. Growing up while observing the views the world offers, only makes me question them to get a better understanding of each and every different perspective. Within the philosophical branches of metaphysics, epistemology, and axiology, I've observed that I have no absolute answer to the questions that are asked. I have ideas but, are those really answers? With my own skepticism, I've compared myself to the famous Greek philosopher: Socrates.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I chose the topic of Socrates for many reasons. When we were learning about him in class, I thought that it was interesting because of what he decided to do with his life, and how he decided to live it. He didn’t back down, or follow the laws of Athens, and he stood for what he believed in.…

    • 110 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Democracy is based on the opinion of the majority. This ideology proposes that what the greater portion of a society desires should be the governing body’s duty to achieve. However, what democracy fails to realize is that sometimes humanity is flawed, and occasionally, mankind’s majority is wrong. There has been many examples throughout history in which the beliefs of societies were complete fallacies, yet were perceived to be common knowledge. This is why one should question what those around him or her say because much of what they hear may be false.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon Justice Analysis

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Problem set 2 1.) What, according to the theory developed by Glaucon in Republic II, is justice? Why and in what sense is it good to be just person, and bad to be an unjust person? According to the theory developed by Glaucon, justice is the case where people agreed to be good to each other, so that not to end up in a chaos.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    My objections target the deathless nature of the soul. The first deals with Socrates’ notion that the soul cannot be destroyed. Socrates takes the soul to be like snow, which brings with it a necessary predicate. Snow, for example, brings with it the Form of Coldness and cannot admit the Form of Hotness. However, when approached by heat, the Coldness of the snow must either retreat or be destroyed, resulting in the snow ceasing to be.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against Socrates

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates argument In the apology book Socrates have many accusers. Now he is accused of corrupting the youth but He is denying the allegations he is saying that he could not intentionally corrupt anyone. Some people are convinced that he is speaking the truth but some people thing that he is lying.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    His strongest empirical argument against the immortality of the soul goes as follows: "The soul, therefore, if immortal, existed before our birth: And if that state no wise concerned us, neither will the latter." Plato 's response to this argument would likely be that events prior to our birth, do in fact concern us because we are reminded of them every time we see approximations of forms. This rebuttal is troublesome, however, because it seeks to refute a physical argument with a metaphysical argument. Although these arguments are difficult to compare, they both offer a legitimate stance, in support of their respective…

    • 1519 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays