Home Page
Singer And Masons 'Ethics And Animals'

Singer And Masons 'Ethics And Animals'

Improved Essays

Show More

In Singer and Masons “Ethics and Animals”, being a vegetarian an ethical requirement? This thought is absurd. There are so many reasons why this is completely impossible. Average Americans simply cannot afford fruits and vegetables. There are so many amino acids, vitamins and protein that can only be gotten from animal meat. Also is it unethical to take away our choice to live the way we want to live. My coworker is a vegetarian, and his main argument he makes is the treatment of the animals. How the conditions are horrendous and I’m sure he’s not alone. But when you think about cage free and big box house chickens. The reason cage free are so expensive is because they feed them special food and let them run around. Now you can’t possibly

Related Documents

Decent Essays
Animal Rights In Animal, By Peter Singer
- 75 Words
- 1 Pages
Animal Rights In Animal, By Peter Singer

Peter Singer, an animal liberator, argues that animals should have rights because they have the ability to experience suffering. One of the scenes shows how a baby elephant is finding it difficult to sleep at night: the elephant was having a nightmare of how his mum was killed, which had become a trauma for the elephant. This shows that elephants have the memory of everything that happens to them, which can sometimes lead to suffering.…
- 75 Words
- 1 Pages
Decent Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Analysis Of Tom Regan's Arguments For The Ethical Treatment Of Animals
- 807 Words
- 4 Pages
Analysis Of Tom Regan's Arguments For The Ethical Treatment Of Animals

Tom Regan argues for the treatment of animals to be the same as that of humans. Rather than arguing a utilitarian perspective, Regan posits that an inherent value exists within entities that are what he calls “the subject of a life,” or rather have the ability to perceive and to possess desires and to deprive these entities of their life without sufficient moral reasoning is unconscionable. While humans may be privy to a larger range of cognitive abilities, Regan argues that these talents are superfluous and that mutual respect must be equally enjoyed amongst all subjects of life. This implies that consumption of meat must cease and that subjection to research cannot unilaterally be applied to animals. Opponents to Regan’s stance argue that…
- 807 Words
- 4 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Superior Essays
Analysis Of R. G. Frey's Moral Standing, The Value Of Life
- 1239 Words
- 5 Pages
Analysis Of R. G. Frey's Moral Standing, The Value Of Life

Your grandfather’s Alzheimer’s has progressed to such a degree that his mental capabilities are no more than those of a lab rat. Scientists are in need of test subjects, so your grandpa is shipped off to a facility where they test unregulated amounts of drugs, makeup, and shampoos on him. R. G. Frey uses this example of testing on cognitively impaired humans throughout his piece, “Moral Standing, the Value of Lives, and Speciesism.”. This paper will outline Frey’s arguments on why human life generally has more value than animal life and highlight the exceptions to the rule that justify the mentioned scenario, while also presenting objections to the unequal value thesis and evaluating those oppositions with respect to humans with cognitive disabilities…
- 1239 Words
- 5 Pages
Superior Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Factory Farming And Virtue Ethics
- 955 Words
- 4 Pages
Factory Farming And Virtue Ethics

According to this ethical system anything that is dependent upon humans (Sander- Staudt, 2009). So, this means that any animal that is not dependent upon human such as wild rabbits or birds are not our responsibility but as soon as we take them into our hands they have become our moral responsibility. With this in mind, it can be concluded that all the animals that are located on factory farms are automatically our moral responsibility (Sander-Staudt, 2009). This does not mean that one needs to turn to veganism or vegetarianism but as long as we are allowing the animals that we are raising to eat to live “happy lives” then we are living in right moral standing. We are obligated to provide adequate shelter and food so that we are avoiding pain and suffering for the animals (Sander- Staudt, 2009).…
- 955 Words
- 4 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Decent Essays
How Does Peter Singer Justify The Use Of Non Human Animals
- 263 Words
- 2 Pages
How Does Peter Singer Justify The Use Of Non Human Animals

One of the strongest arguments for our uses of non-human animals is the argument of need. Most people believe that we are justified in doing what it takes to in other to survive, in fact, most people even think it is okay to kill another human in the name of self defense. This argument does not justify using animals for non necessary things, such as, cosmetic testing, but eating is a necessity, so there is nothing wrong with eating animals. The problem is that we know humans can be perfectly healthy without eating animals. So yes you need to eat, but do not need to eat animals.…
- 263 Words
- 2 Pages
Decent Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Enthusiast Kadya Araki Analysis
- 1195 Words
- 5 Pages
Enthusiast Kadya Araki Analysis

The article “Why All Humans Need to Eat Meat for Health,” written by bodybuilding enthusiast Kadya Araki, talks about the benefits of eating meat and how it contributes to human body growth. She argues that meat is necessary for physical and mental health, and thus shouldn’t be cut out of a person’s diet. Araki believes that humans need to eat meat to be healthy, and claims that a meatless diet can’t provide the necessary nutrients for muscle growth and good health; however, her argument used insufficient evidence for proving that we can’t live on a vegan diet, did not account for other factors that may have had an influence on people’s health, and dismissed one of the main reasons why people choose to be vegan. Before delving deep into the…
- 1195 Words
- 5 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Epstein And Brook's Essay: The Heedlessness Of Animal Rights
- 814 Words
- 4 Pages
Epstein And Brook's Essay: The Heedlessness Of Animal Rights

The Heedlessness of Animal Rights Animal rights are the rights believed to belong to animals, so they can live experiment-free. The basic principle of animal rights according to PETA states that “animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on or use for entertainment” (BROOK). It is no secret that animal rights is one of the paramount controversial topics of the 21st century. There are still debates today between animal rights activists and animal rights terrorists. However animal rights activists seem to captivate different audiences through the media.…
- 814 Words
- 4 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Tom Regan The Radical Egalitarian Case For Animal Rights Analysis
- 899 Words
- 4 Pages
Tom Regan The Radical Egalitarian Case For Animal Rights Analysis

The animal rights movement declares that animals have the same right to life and protection from suffering, as well as any other creature that can feel pain. Doctor of Philosophy, Tom Regan, justifies animal rights from the standpoint of logic. In his article “The Radical Egalitarian Case for Animal Rights”, the author takes a firm stance on this issue and claims that almost all human relationships with animals have the exploitative nature. At the same time, animals have the right to meet the needs and the implementation of their natural purposes. Tom Regan 's argument can be formulated as follows non-human animals have an equal right to respect and treatment for them, which means that hurting them or using as a raw material or a kind of resource…
- 899 Words
- 4 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Jonathan Safran Foer Eating Animal Analysis
- 1283 Words
- 6 Pages
Jonathan Safran Foer Eating Animal Analysis

Eating animals has been a regular meal for humans for many centuries, but it has also been opposed by veganists for many years. Although consuming animals has been opposed by vegan aficionados, it has also been a source of controversy because of how factory farming produces the meat we eat in our daily meals. In the book “Eating Animals” we get the sense that the author will be arguing and encouraging veganism, but instead he argues about how the meat we consume is produced. The author Jonathan Safran Foer’s main claim in the book is about boycotting animal factory farming and encouraging traditional husbandry because factory farm animals are stuffed with antibiotics, mutilated, tightly confined, and deprived of stimulation. While traditional…
- 1283 Words
- 6 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Animal Equality In Peter Singer's 'Animal Liberation'
- 573 Words
- 3 Pages
Animal Equality In Peter Singer's 'Animal Liberation'

Yo bro, we’re learning about this crazy argument in my philosophy class, it is about animal equality. In, Animal Liberation, Peter Singer argues that we should extend the same rights and equality of human beings to non humans; animals. He does not make this claim meaning animals are equal in abilities, opportunities, or their logic towards life. Also, if he achieves his claim he does not agree to have equal rights towards animals. Peter Singer argues for equal consideration.…
- 573 Words
- 3 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Analysis Of Alastair Norcross's Article Puppies, Pigs
- 1023 Words
- 5 Pages
Analysis Of Alastair Norcross's Article Puppies, Pigs

Often, we as people, are faced with a difficult question: is it morally right or morally wrong to eat meat. Alastair Norcross discusses this in his article, “Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases.” In this article Norcross tells the story of Fred, a man who lost the ability to taste chocolate due to a car accident. He sets up twenty-six cages of puppies, and leads them to live stress induced lives. This is because when the puppies are under stress, they produce a hormone called cocoamone, which can give Fred the ability to taste chocolate again.…
- 1023 Words
- 5 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Analysis Of At The Fork By Nathanael Johnson
- 1085 Words
- 5 Pages
Analysis Of At The Fork By Nathanael Johnson

The animal rights movement consists of privileged ideology based off emotion and no logic. Nathanael Johnson explores these ideals in “Is there a Moral Case for Meat?” and a couple in the film “At the Fork” explores the morality of farming. While the article and film seem to take similar stances on the farming of animals, I disagree. Humans do not have a responsibility to avoid meat or mitigate the suffering of farm raised animals.…
- 1085 Words
- 5 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Animal Cruelty In An Animal's Place By Michael Pollan
- 1046 Words
- 5 Pages
Animal Cruelty In An Animal's Place By Michael Pollan

Animal cruelty has always been a challenge that gets overlooked by society in the food market. Many people do not take into consideration the life of the cow, chicken, or pig, and lots of other animals, while enjoying their juicy hamburger, chicken leg, and bacon. “An Animal’s Place” by Michael Pollan argues about animal liberation while using support from Peter Singer’s “Animal Liberation” book. Peter Singer is pro animal rights and has converted lots and outs of people over to vegetarianism, while Michael Pollan loves steak and seeks to see if Singer could convert him as well. Our world changes consistently with the trends of our society, from the civil rights movements of blacks and women, to the legalization of gay marriage.…
- 1046 Words
- 5 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Great Essays
Why Is Veganism Wrong
- 1664 Words
- 7 Pages
Why Is Veganism Wrong

Going Vegan: The Wrong Decision People who avoid eating any and all animal products can have health related problems later in life. The origins of a meatless diet relates to religious and ethical beliefs such as kindness to animals (D’Amico 1). The meatless diet has existed for centuries, but now, it arises as more of a trend of people wanting others to become vegan as well as being kind to animals. The moral values have lasted since the diet’s origins, but the execution persists to cause error. The ones that make the change, from eating meat to not, have issues changing their diet and keeping it balanced.…
- 1664 Words
- 7 Pages
Great Essays

Read More
Great Essays
Ethical Argument In Animal Welfare
- 1672 Words
- 7 Pages
- 10 Works Cited
Ethical Argument In Animal Welfare

Many show that a major issue in animal welfare should be solved by vegetarianism and not torture animals to get their meat. As Freeman argues, “animals used for food in the United States are commonly treated like unfeeling tools of production, rather than living, feeling animals,” (Freeman 170). Many feel the need to reduce meat because of animal cruelty, and not because of the welfare of the…
- 1672 Words
- 7 Pages
- 10 Works Cited
Great Essays

Read More

Related Topics