Animal Equality In Peter Singer's 'Animal Liberation'

Improved Essays
Yo bro, we’re learning about this crazy argument in my philosophy class, it is about animal equality. In, Animal Liberation, Peter Singer argues that we should extend the same rights and equality of human beings to non humans; animals. He does not make this claim meaning animals are equal in abilities, opportunities, or their logic towards life. Also, if he achieves his claim he does not agree to have equal rights towards animals. Peter Singer argues for equal consideration. This means that if an animal were to feel pain and suffering, then the same rights should be extended to the animal as if it were human. As singer states his claim is not just for the equality of humans but for non humans as well; animals. Singer states in Animal Liberation,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Peter Singer, an animal liberator, argues that animals should have rights because they have the ability to experience suffering. One of the scenes shows how a baby elephant is finding it difficult to sleep at night: the elephant was having a nightmare of how his mum was killed, which had become a trauma for the elephant. This shows that elephants have the memory of everything that happens to them, which can sometimes lead to suffering.…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "Tracy Reiman, an executive vice president for PETA discusses animal rights and the treatment of animals during a time of racism published in the Tribune News Service. Reiman argues that while we have progressed as a more humane society, our treatment towards animals should improve and believes that the best time to address these issues is nowas it goes hand in hand with other issues such as discrimination and wants to include species into the line of inclusivity to augment its meaning. While I agree with what she’s fighting for, specific sections in Reiman’s article made me question her argument. In paragraph 14, Reiman emphasizes her points by comparing the issue of animal rights and how we treat them to key events from the past giving a…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In his essay, “Speciesism and the Equality of Animals,” Peter Singer argues that the standard for having a right to get equal consideration as others is the species’ “capacity for suffering and enjoyment” (205), and therefore, a species which satisfies the standard should be protected from speciesism. Speciesism is “a prejudice or attitude of bias toward the interests of members of one’s own species and against those of members of other species” (204). Singer states that many people’s voices arguing that intelligence cannot justify racism and sexism bring speciesism towards animals into…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For his part, Peter Singer says we should think about the treatment of non-human animals in terms of an equal consideration of interests, which means that identical…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal rights are the benefits that people give to animals. Benefits that people give from human use and abuse and the right to protection from human use and abuse and rights can take the moral, legal and practical forms. According to Rifkin 's article “ A change of heart about animals” there is evidence that animals do feel pain and love. For example, elephants moan when they lose a loved one, Koko knows sign language and understands bunch of words, pigs the react differently when they get what they want or when the allowed to play. And around the world and U.S people really don’t take these points into consideration.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    More than 150 billion animals are slaughtered each year. Compare that to the 13,000 people that were murdered just last year. Now obviously it is not feasible to take those two statistics into consideration when talking about the feelings of animals. But philosopher Peter Singer is right to claim that human suffering and animal suffering should be given equal consideration. Australian philosopher, Peter Singer, starts off his argument by comparing the ethics behind women’s rights to that of animal rights.…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Peter Singer in the article “All Animals are Equal,” defends the opinion that non-human animals must be respected as the lives of humans. He argues that all animals are equals. Singer claims equality is the base on same consideration, is a moral idea, and the capacity to suffer is a prerequisite for rights. To demonstrate that equality is based on equal consideration, Peter argues ideas to not extend the rights to non humans are inconsistent.…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Elite Farm Services, a British Columbia chicken-catching company is currently facing harsh denunciation after Mercy for Animals, an animal welfare group released a video documenting the company’s extreme acts of animal abuse. In the video, a number of employees can be seen throwing, stomping on, mangling and dismembering chickens, all while in front of passive supervisors. As of June 13th, 2017, six employees have been fired from their positions and are liable to face charges; while knowledge of this disciplinary action was enough to placate a portion of the public, not all are satisfied. With many consumers demonstrating a demand for retribution in the form of petitions, public protests and boycotts, most companies associated with Elite Farm…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Herzog, Hal. ‘Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why it’s so hard to think Straight about Animals”. New York, NY, Harper Perennial, 2010. Hal Herzog focuses on the ethically inconsistent views that prevail in commonly held attitudes toward animals. The author suggests that moral incoherence is hardwired into the thinking of our species as a random by-product of evolution.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Heedlessness of Animal Rights Animal rights are the rights believed to belong to animals, so they can live experiment-free. The basic principle of animal rights according to PETA states that “animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on or use for entertainment” (BROOK). It is no secret that animal rights is one of the paramount controversial topics of the 21st century. There are still debates today between animal rights activists and animal rights terrorists. However animal rights activists seem to captivate different audiences through the media.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The animal rights movement declares that animals have the same right to life and protection from suffering, as well as any other creature that can feel pain. Doctor of Philosophy, Tom Regan, justifies animal rights from the standpoint of logic. In his article “The Radical Egalitarian Case for Animal Rights”, the author takes a firm stance on this issue and claims that almost all human relationships with animals have the exploitative nature. At the same time, animals have the right to meet the needs and the implementation of their natural purposes. Tom Regan 's argument can be formulated as follows non-human animals have an equal right to respect and treatment for them, which means that hurting them or using as a raw material or a kind of resource…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case that animal suffering should be given equal consideration to that of human suffering is a claim Peter Singer makes and that I disagree with, instead arguing that human suffering should be more highly considered to that of animals. Exposition- 310 words Peter Singer in his argument claims that human suffering and animal suffering should be treated in the same manner, putting the lives of other animals in the same categories as those of humans. This argument begins by talking about how humans should be considered in the same group as animals, this is all due by part that we are all members of the animal kingdom, living in the same world, breathing the same air, and occupying the same space. The rights should be universally equal amongst all species.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hesse G. Sambaan September 25, 2017 Comp II What’s wrong with the animal rights by Vicki Hearne Vicki Hearne thinks that there is more for animal satisfaction for happiness that is the personal achievement. Animals find happiness in their work that they do that you can call “talent”. She believes that animal right advocates got all it wrong, making some of the animals suffer and they are more concern of arguing than the animal’s happiness. The essay was persuasive, she uses her own knowledge as animal trainer and she proves that the only one who can really define the animal’s happiness is the owner. to clarify her own essays, she also uses her own animals, her experienced, and a lot of examples.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While non-human animals devote most of their time to satisfy instinctual needs, humans have the ability to write intricate pieces of literary fiction or thinking about what party candidate best represents their ideology and social needs. Why should we extend the principle of equality to non-human animals if there are a plethora of differences between the humankind and other species? Peter Singer argues that there “is no barrier to the case of extending the basic principle of equality to nonhuman animals” (Singer, 1989, p. 149), for the differences between humans and other animals can be addressed by providing different treatment and rights to the needs of each group. When Singer says that we need to extend the basic principle of equality, he specifies that he will consider this principle to be equality of consideration. What the author means is that we ought not to give greater weight to the interests of one group over…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal’s Capabilities In Bonnie Steinbock’s “Speciesism and the Idea of Equality” she provides arguments against those of Peter Singers in his article “All Animals are Equal.” Steinbock argues that non-human animals should have specifics rights. She didn’t go as far as saying that they should have the right to vote or marry, but the right to be recognized as coherent beings just as capable of suffering and feeling as we are. The way that I see it, Steinbock provides some valid points but fails to acknowledge the quantity of animals in our world, and that there are some animals that we don’t care if they suffer.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays