Should The Government Use Torture Against Our Own Military?

Improved Essays
So what could Americans or their government say if torture were to be used against our own military? What would be the rationale for why it’s wrong? The excuse of the ticking time bomb may not work for those countries or groups that would seek to use torture against us, but there will always be another equally plausible excuse for torture, even if that excuse is simply the need for information that might save their people. And therein lies the difficulty of using torture against others, even with a seemingly plausible excuse. Of course, it is not as if the U.S. is the only country that uses or has used torture in the past. It’s not. In 2014, Amnesty reported that 141 countries were still believed to have been using torture and that “the findings point to what Michael Bochenek, Amnesty’s senior director for International Law and Policy, called a “disconnect” between policy and practice and between public condemnation of torture and the pervading misconception that “this is the way it has to be” for states to be kept secure”(Pizzi). …show more content…
Of course, the U.S. can’t be blamed for all of the torture occurring around the world, but “Manfred Nowak, the former U.N. Special Rapporteur on Torture, told Al Jazeera that the U.S. — once viewed as a vanguard in the fight for human rights worldwide — has opened the door for other countries to engage in torture under the auspices of fighting terrorism”(Pizzi). Nowak said the U.S. has relied on their ticking time bomb as an excuse to torture suspected terrorists

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Introducing the author Daniel J. Hill, he made good points on views of torture on how it could be permissible and not permissible. He introduced different scenarios on how to look at torture and was very interesting. One view he gave was a “defense case” that expressed that the officer spots a terrorist who plans to detonate a bomb that could risk lives of many. The officer made the choice to tase the terrorist just enough to paralyze him from making the bomb go off. Another case was the “interrogation case” that speaks about a terrorist planting a bomb somewhere and security services using electric shocks to get the terrorist to speak on the whereabouts of the bomb.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article The Ticking Time Bomb, Dershowitz tries to justify the use of non-lethal torture in-order to protect destruction. For instance, when a terrorist who has planted bombs is captured and they do not reveal about their terror plots during interrogation; the use of non-lethal torture such as putting a needle under the fingernails is justifiable as it will help to save hundreds of lives. For example, if a dog is suffering from a disease and, there is no way of giving anesthesia to the dog, then we would have to resort to torture such as closing down its mouth forcefully in order to vaccinate or operate the dog. Even though torture looks inhumane, sometimes the use of torture is justifiable such as in the ticking time bomb scene as the…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cathy Young, in the article How Much Torture is OK, makes a very valid point when talking about torture. She believes if some torture is considered to be OK all torture will be considered OK. To be more specific, if they make exceptions for some circumstances, then it’ll be hard to justify between what is right and wrong. She also mentioned that the ticking time bomb situation was highly improbable. Young is a pragmatist, she understands that there is no right answer to the situation but in this case she wants to preserve America's core…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torturing suspects or criminals is a very hot issue in the United States. There are many arguments between should the US officials torture terrorists when interrogating them. Michael Levin says he agrees on torturing terrorists for information in his essay, “The Case for Torture”. He addresses his arguments by giving a few hypothetical scenarios of terrorist attacks. One of the examples is, when there is an atomic bomb in Manhattan which is going to explode very soon, the US got the guy who planted it and need to get the location of the bomb and method to disarm it.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Parry 2010). There are other cases, when people, who are so much committed to their religious ideology for example, would prefer to die because of pain or injures and would not agree to talk. In such cases tortures could also be hardly considered to be effective, as they practically lead to a murder of an individual and nothing more. Often tortures are seen as rather effective as preventive means, when they are applied towards dissidents or guerrillas with the…

    • 1037 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture Debate Analysis

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When the author talks about the pilot shooting down a hijacked plane versus non-lethal torture, it makes it difficult for readers to differentiate between what is considered lethal or not. When the government makes such changes, individuals wait and see if the change has made a positive or negative impact on the country yet with torture there is no accurate evidence to prove whether or not it is…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I defend the nature of the balance of civil liberties, rights and torture by drawing upon Jeremy Waldron, Henry Shue and Jeff McMahan’s view on the morality of torture. Torture is the act of deliberately inflicting severe physical or psychological pain to an individual who is restrained and defenseless. Reasons for torture can include punishment, revenge, political re-education, deterrence, interrogation or coercion of the victim or a third party, or simply the sadistic gratification of those carrying out or observing the torture. In this paper I will argue that torture is not morally justified; torture ought not to be legalized or otherwise institutionalized even in the ticking time bomb scenario because the rights of the innocent…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How do you determine if and when the use of torture would be ethical? Let’s begin by examining the views of two well-known philosophers John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant. Each of these philosophers had strong opinions and stances on the moral and ethical use of torture. John Stuart Mills’ theory on the ethical of the use of torture is that it is acceptable if it brings happiness and/or pleasure to the majority of people than if the torture were not carried out. One example he gives to support that theory is, if a terrorist has information that will prevent an act of terror that would result in the death of hundreds of innocent people and by obtaining this information thru an act of torture, it would likely save those lives he would agree…

    • 1009 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture Vs Torture

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Unfortunately, however, different forms of inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment as well as torture are practised in all parts of the world, including highly industrialised and developed countries. Despite the fact that society is evolving, the effect of torture remains the same: such violations of human rights result in serious harm to the human being, to his physical and mental immunity, and requires a lot of effort to make it stop. Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) says: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment” . For many years international legal institutions have been developing, improving and consolidating different ways of resolving the problem. At…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hundreds of years later several countries have signed the “Convention Against Torture” in agreement that torture will not be practiced in their country. As the world had progressed, torture has significantly reduced, however, the concept of torture being wrong and unjust originated several hundred years ago during the…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Wrong To Torture

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Desperate Times Would you ever hurt someone? What if hurting that someone meant that you would be seen as a hero amongst many? What if hurting someone meant that you were able to save innocent lives? What if hurting someone meant that you lost a piece of yourself and what it means to be human? `The topic at hand is if it is ever justifiable to torture someone under any circumstance.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Torture Is Wrong

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Torture is generally ineffective, effects those subjected to it for the remainder of their lives, and is unacceptable no matter the reason. Consider the United Nations, what it is and what it stands for. The United Nations wrote and signed something known as the Geneva Conventions. The Geneva Conventions explicitly state in article 3 that, “humane treatment is required for all people in enemy hands. The use of murder, mutilation, torture, and the use of humiliating or degrading treatment is prohibited.”…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United Nations also prohibited torture in 1984 and the United States own sixth amendment says no cruel and unusual punishment (ProQuest Staff 1). However these key laws have key loopholes. The sixth amendment is valid for only United States citizens, and the United Nations just prohibits torture. Even the sole laws protecting those captured can be reversed or worked around. Curt Goering discusses, “The next president could reverse the executive order, and torture becomes a policy rather than a legal matter” (A Strong Senate 1).…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of torture can scare many people. In today’s world torture is now viewed as a thing of the past; a solution to our ancestor’s problems. Yet in reality, the dilemma whether torture should be used or not is still an issue. Many people would automatically say torture should not be allowed, until they are told millions of lives depend on it. Michael Levin is the person that made many readers second guess their answer to that simple, yet difficult question.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the article “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin was published in Newsweek in 1982, it has stirred up many debates regarding the universal use of torture. Levin believes that torture is justifiable in extreme cases such as preventing terrorism to save lives. Levin argues by giving examples of make-believe scenarios in which the only two options given are to either meet the demands of the terrorist or to torture the terrorist so that innocent lives can be spared; however, Levin’s argument is flawed because he never fully defines the boundaries which can be placed on the concept of torture that would ensure that the use of torture is not abused. He believes that the best way to address a problem in which one wants an immediate result…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays