Michael Levin The Case For Torture

Improved Essays
Torturing suspects or criminals is a very hot issue in the United States. There are many arguments between should the US officials torture terrorists when interrogating them. Michael Levin says he agrees on torturing terrorists for information in his essay, “The Case for Torture”. He addresses his arguments by giving a few hypothetical scenarios of terrorist attacks. One of the examples is, when there is an atomic bomb in Manhattan which is going to explode very soon, the US got the guy who planted it and need to get the location of the bomb and method to disarm it. The guy will prefer death to failure, so, the US has the only way to get information from him — torture. Here is where he addresses the right of the terrorist, officially,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Introducing the author Daniel J. Hill, he made good points on views of torture on how it could be permissible and not permissible. He introduced different scenarios on how to look at torture and was very interesting. One view he gave was a “defense case” that expressed that the officer spots a terrorist who plans to detonate a bomb that could risk lives of many. The officer made the choice to tase the terrorist just enough to paralyze him from making the bomb go off. Another case was the “interrogation case” that speaks about a terrorist planting a bomb somewhere and security services using electric shocks to get the terrorist to speak on the whereabouts of the bomb.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary: The Term Torture

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The term “Torture” derives from the Latin word “tortus” meaning “twisted. Torture involves the intentional infliction of physical or mental pain on a person to fulfill some desire of the perpetrator or to compel some action from the victim. The following are some general definitions of torture. 1. Torture is the act of inflicting excruciating pain, as punishment or revenge, as a means of getting a confession or information, or for sheer cruelty.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Anne Applebaum states in “The Torture Myth”, that America has operated under the false pretense that torture is a viable option for obtaining information, and because terrorists are malicious, so America needs more aggression to win. She argues that torture hurts the country more than it benefits. Torture…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture Warrants Essay Response to the Reading I will begin by stating that when it comes to torture, I am fully against it if there is not an extremely good reason for it. No type of torture (psychological, physical, emotional, and sexual) should be done willy-nilly. I also condemn the involvement of innocents (such as unknowing family members or friends). If, however, the situation did call for extreme levels of torture, I would do it with no qualms whatsoever. Concerning the readings, I agree mainly with Scarry, but I understand where Dershowitz is coming from in regards to his wish for accountability for the torturers, but I don’t believe that his plan for a warrant system would actually help increase it.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If we use torture tactics we could prevent more major terrorist attacks. Torture is the easiest way to get information out of terrorist. The CIA would only use torture methods on Al Qaeda leaders in order to get information that may prevent future attacks. Personally I believe that these torture methods are justified because of what they do to POW’s overseas. 59% of the American society support the CIA’s methods according to new polls conducted by telephone calls.(Adam Goldman reports on terrorism and national security for The Washington Post.)…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Strained positions for long hours, sleep deprivation and waterboarding, with the occasional punch or slap, may sound worth it in order to save thousands of innocent Americans lives from the ongoing war of terror. It is a known fact that the American government used the term “enhanced interrogation” loosely in order to cover up their questionable actions to get any little piece of information about any terrorist motives with torture. Enhanced interrogation has been described as systematic torture in order to obtain potential terrorist information. Even though the CIA get their information, the process behind on how they got it always remains confidential only for the government. Because of the confidentiality this causes a problem to the public and foreign relations.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Torture is a controversial issue and extremely polarizing within the evangelical community. One side says that torture is never justified, while the other side says that torture is morally justified under certain straining circumstances. David P. Gushee takes the former ideology and argues in his 5 REASONS TORTURE IS ALWAYS WRONG that torture is never morally justified. Gushee forms a fairly solid argument that advocated his position with his use of historical scenarios, biblical evidence, and commonly shared beliefs, however, the downfall of the core of his argument consequently precipitates from his usage of false parallelism. In contrast, Michael Levin advocates in favor of the latter ideology.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many reasons why the torture shouldn’t be legal. For example, what if the suspected bomber, isn’t the mastermind behind the whole plan. If the person tries to tell the police that, they obviously won’t believe the person and torture them worse. Another reason why it shouldn’t be legal is, what if the suspected bomber decides to not tell the police anything. If the suspected bomber is willing to die to make sure the plan is accomplished, then not only did the police kill someone, they also wasted time that could’ve been spent searching for the…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Wrong To Torture

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Interrogating one man can help reveal additional information to help foil any other possible plans the terrorist may have up his sleeves. In addition the utilitarian principle still applies in this situation. In fact, it is even more justifiable, because the torturer only places one person in pain. Not only do you get to save more lives, but torturing someone only causes them temporary physical pain. Killing thousands is permanent damage.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers have discussed the hypothetical case of the ticking time bomb in which “a decent leader of a nation is plagued with terrorism is asked to authorize the torture of a rebel leader who knows or probably knows the city, set to go off within the next 24 hours” (Ethical Life, 294). Jeremy Bentham, one of the philosophers argues he would torture the terrorist to save the masses of people because the number of lives saved would be greater than those hurt. “If the torture…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Would you like to know what's stopping millions of americans from losing their lives? Or who puts an end to the plots? Well the gruesome truth is that what's stopping these attacks is torture. Torture is defined by, to inflict severe pain on, what hundreds of people believe, is doing what's necessary to save lives. Many people disagree with the thought of torture and believe it's inhumane and unconstitutional, but the reality is that it is what’s preventing another severe attack like 9/11.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Torturing is another way the to get reliable information from terrorist, but why torture to get important information from them? Can there be another way to get intel instead of torture? What about the terrorist will? People know that torture is cruel and terrorists too. But is torture the right way to get intel?…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many scholars who seek to justify the use of torture use the consequentialist argument by saying the positive consequences compensate for any of the negatives. Thus saying torture is a permissible mechanism as long as torture is the lesser of two evils. In order for those who support torture to fortify and expand their stance, they depend greatly on the theoretical scenario of a ticking bomb, which was formerly thought of by an English philosopher known as Bentham (Bellamy 137). The ticking bomb argument expresses an urgent situation in which torture is essential to gather information from a terrorist about the site of a ticking bomb. In this scenario, the use of torture can be evaluated as the lesser evil in order to avert a greater evil –…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Levin makes it clear that torture should not be used as punishment, but as a way to prevent future terror. No terrorist victim should lose his or her life just because America considers torture as unethical. One example Michael provided was when former president Roosevelt faced an ethical dilemma; in 1943 he could have had Hitler killed but did not based on ethical grounds. However, in this time period Americans now see that if he would have had him killed the war would have ended, and many lives would have been saved. A different time Levin also appealed to the audience’s logical reasoning was when he said torture was justified since “unlike his victims, he volunteered for the risks of his deed.”…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Opponents against torture will argue that the right of an individual against the practice of cruel and inhumane punishment is unequivocal, but proponents of torture could argue that the right of an individual to be free from the act of cruel and inhumane sufferings at the hand of a terrorist is unambiguous. How, then, do the government draw a fair balance between torture and liberty? Should the government forego effective interrogations of a terrorist suspect in the ticking time bomb dilemma and risk the liberty of many? The answer, though complex, is never.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays