Should Animals Have Rights Essay

Improved Essays
Do you really believe that animals should have the same rights as us humans? If you think about this, passing a Bill of Rights for animals could go against centuries of human culture, increase the cost of food, hinder medical research, and may cause other problems. I believe that animals should not have a Bill of Rights.

My first reason is that such a law would go against human culture because we as people run the world. Can animals even work, cook, clean, or even talk, think about it. Giving animals the same rights as we have would just be ignorant. I understand that people want companies to treat animals with more respect which is acceptable, but to give them rights that will just change humanity forever. Humans are use to processed foods and they know what they’re eating so to switch it up would not make sense. The film Blackfish tries to convince the audience that organizations like Seaworld hold wild animals back from having a good life. Personally I do not agree with the film, Seaworld is a very successful
…show more content…
Using assembly lines in big corporations like “Tyson foods” is just nature to them. That is how we have always got our food quickly and at a low price. Switching it up would probably close down big businesses and leave many people jobless. Also the average family could only afford this food, forcing them to buy all organic or real meat will make them bankrupt. I’m sure by having an Animal Bill of Rights it would try to make you become a vegetarian and if not then it would be really expensive to buy meat. You cannot just do this, it is hard enough to find jobs now days by passing this bill parents would need to double their time at work or get a second job leaving them no time for their families. We are doing just fine as we are today, with no animal bill. People who want their all organic or unprocessed meat can go buy some and leave the rest of the community to buy what they

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Veganism Vs Vegetarianism

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This kind of lifestyle also can’t work in all parts of the world without added cost (Nandi). Raising beef is also necessary to achieve the most efficient way to produce food due to land availability. Eighty-five percent of all US grazing land is impossible to grow crops on (Vegetarian). If everyone eats grown crops then this land will go to waste and further the world hunger crisis. Even though vegetarians argue that they are reducing their environmental footprint, there are several reasons why this is not true.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, it is considered a social norm to eat animals, but extremely wrong to eat another human. Although this is a norm, this belief technically makes people Speciests because they are favoring saving their own species over other species. By killing animals simply to pleasure our taste buds and considering animals to be acceptable to eat, humans prove themselves to be Speciests. Not only do humans eat animals, but they also use them as test subjects. It is considered very unethical to use a human as a test subject in an experiment even for biomedical research, so animals are used.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So instead of using the term “animal rights,” people should use the term “animal welfare.” Animals don’t have the same rights or even close to the same rights as us humans. Animal welfare states that we know that animals may be used for certain purposes but shouldn’t be mistreated or abused. Some people say that animals behave selfishly, and only look out for themselves and their own interests. Since animals don’t behave morally they don’t deserve to be treated morally by human beings. If we want animals to have rights like us humans then that means we can’t breed or kill them for…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Most people find animal testing, hunting, and industrialized farming to be inhumane, but should the world have to struggle to find new ways to support its people just so an organism without the same capabilities as humans be free to roam as they please? Additionally, there is a difference between wanting animals to have rights and being concerned about the welfare of animals. When thinking of the animal kingdom it is important to keep in mind the benefits they bring to the modern era, for example, medical research and food. Even though animal rights and suffrage has been a problem for hundreds of years the spark of modern interest in the state of animal rights seemed to ignite with Australian philosopher, Peter Singer. Regardless of scientific evidence that humans share a lot of qualities with that of a chimp…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Violated interests explain that even the most humane forms of preparing and killing animals for food nearly almost violates the animals most basic interest which is to predominantly keep living. Modern agriculture often violates other key animal rights/ interests as well; to live in natural or decent conditions, to make free choices, to be free from fear again, to live healthy lives without needing medical interventions, to eat a natural diet and to enjoy the normal/social/family/community life of its spaces . The argument for human interest vs animals interests can be made invalid as humans don’t need to eat meat in order to survive whereas if you kill animals for meat you are permanently killing them. Animals are essentially like us so do deserve to have their interests heard. Human interest in this case is classed as trivial because human beings don’t need to eat meat in order to…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vegetarian Vs Eating Meat

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Becoming a vegetarian is more ethical than eating meats. Multitudinous religions do not support the killing of animals for meat or sport as a result of the belief that all life is valuable. If more people become vegetarian, the meat industries will have fewer customers to sell to, so the supply will decline when there is no demand. Large amounts of animals are put through horrible conditions in their cages and often beaten. This is incredibly inhumane, but several people do not care considering they believe animals lives are not as important.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Welfare Act Essay

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is propose that way because of the symbolic meaning we put ourselves in with other species. We assume we are the alphas and the other animals as lower than us, regarding to the portrayal, we consume them because we are in control. The issues are exactly the same from the approach that activists oppose to why it stabilize us as a society. The movement is characterized as a social movement by the collective action it has gathered from the abolitionists and welfarism activists to change the treatment towards animals or none in captivity. People fight for the propositions of laws so it can benefit animals and at least tolerate the circumstances the animals have been put into.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fox, an ethical philosopher, “Animals do not have ‘rights’ equivalent to humans due to their exclusion from the human ‘moral community’” (Baier 137-138). This “community” includes having a sense of time, being able to make decisions and having a sense of self-awareness (Baier 138). Therefore, testing on animals is more ethical than on humans, based on their inferior status. On the other hand, Peter Singer is against animal testing on the basis that animals do feel an extraordinary amount of pain and should have as many rights as humans. Animals should have equal rights just like…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Veganism

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Veganism attempts to end the exploitation of animals that many justify through the idea of speciesism. Speciesism is the belief that humans are morally superior to non-human animals (“Ethics - Animal Ethics…”). Seeing animals as the moral minority, many can rationalize the consumption of animals and animal byproducts. However, if humans are morally superior, should it not be their responsibility to protect those who cannot protect themselves? It is cruel and unethical to consume animals and animal byproducts when it is no longer necessary.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Leading scientists have warned us that food shortages will become escalade over the next 40 years unless the world 's population switches almost completely to a vegetarian diet” (Walsh 57). Not only is it not cost efficient, but the consuming meat has been linked to multiple diseases and obvious health risks. A plant based diet would improve the obesity crisis America currently suffers through. The number of positive outcomes a meat free diet can introduce to upbringing generations is endless. For one it simply supports a healthy digestive system, furthermore, it also raises the probability of achieving and maintaining an active…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays