Schlick moritz Belief claim:
Moritz the moral philosopher, was only seeking to understand the moral conduct, moral phenomena but was careful not to create them or guide them. As a moralist, he was interested in the quality of life itself and he seeks to enlighten men with respect to the good of life, and therefore, he came with a practical goal and not in the theoretical goal. Therefore, as a moralist, he taught that the good life is a full life, which is to the highest amount of activity valued for its own sake.
Therefore, he said that activities that are valued in and for themselves are properly called or known as play. He also agreed with Schiller that man is truly man only when he plays. And, as a youth is characteristically the time of play, and the concept of “youth” is the clue to the meaning of life. He also believed that whenever man acts out of the joy in acting, it’s believed that his youthful regardless of his age and not only that, it entails philosophically that his life is meaningful. Just as the moralist said “man plays only when he is in the full sense of the word, and he is the only wholly man when he is playing.’’ (Page 64). Therefore, as moralist, he views his work as an explaining of …show more content…
He also see the word ‘’Play’’ as a purposeless action, an action that carries its purpose within itself. Which in the broad philosophical world of meaning are classified as follows; ‘’Creative play’’ playful and creative activities and ‘’Artistic Play’’ work that comes along with playful task which doesn’t intend to enter the conscious mind but filled with charm and attraction. In order words, play is not a form of doing nothing, rather it’s a dedication to an activity which is transformed into play. Therefore, life of play may be seen or considered into an endless puzzle of its own with a deep explanation of
Moritz the moral philosopher, was only seeking to understand the moral conduct, moral phenomena but was careful not to create them or guide them. As a moralist, he was interested in the quality of life itself and he seeks to enlighten men with respect to the good of life, and therefore, he came with a practical goal and not in the theoretical goal. Therefore, as a moralist, he taught that the good life is a full life, which is to the highest amount of activity valued for its own sake.
Therefore, he said that activities that are valued in and for themselves are properly called or known as play. He also agreed with Schiller that man is truly man only when he plays. And, as a youth is characteristically the time of play, and the concept of “youth” is the clue to the meaning of life. He also believed that whenever man acts out of the joy in acting, it’s believed that his youthful regardless of his age and not only that, it entails philosophically that his life is meaningful. Just as the moralist said “man plays only when he is in the full sense of the word, and he is the only wholly man when he is playing.’’ (Page 64). Therefore, as moralist, he views his work as an explaining of …show more content…
He also see the word ‘’Play’’ as a purposeless action, an action that carries its purpose within itself. Which in the broad philosophical world of meaning are classified as follows; ‘’Creative play’’ playful and creative activities and ‘’Artistic Play’’ work that comes along with playful task which doesn’t intend to enter the conscious mind but filled with charm and attraction. In order words, play is not a form of doing nothing, rather it’s a dedication to an activity which is transformed into play. Therefore, life of play may be seen or considered into an endless puzzle of its own with a deep explanation of