Caillois approach to play entails categorization of games while at the same time offering two different orientations to play. On the other hand, Sicart views towards games and play revolves around both ontological and epistemological activities. However, delving in their discussions, one would see some huge similarities in a complementarity fashion. For instance, in his argument, Caillos argues that play is a free activity that is normally outside of the “ordinary” and can be considered as “not serious.” Sicart complements this argument by arguing that play is creative since it entails degrees of expression that is inherent in the activity. When looking at these two different yet similar statements, one would see that the two authors tend project
