Maimonides Fifth Chapter Analysis

Improved Essays
Maimonides’ Fifth Chapter Maimonides’ describes the characteristics of a prophetic follower of God in his Eight Chapters. In Chapter Five, Maimonides argues specifically what makes a human being in the proper sense as aiming to do what is useful to a human, instead of what is pleasant, on the basis of reasoning. Maimonides’ opinion also implies moral and intellectual virtues of a man are concerned, along with the relativity to the unity of the human soul, with the moderation necessary for a human to be in the proper sense. Maimonides argues creating a human being in the proper sense would have the human aiming to do only actions necessary for survival instead of indulging in pleasurable activities. Everything a proper man does must be for the greater good, not purely for contentment. Maimonides states choosing pleasure over sensibility makes man and beast equal; the only true separation from men and animals is the choice and capacity to use reason to support a soul which chooses principle over senseless enjoyment. The purpose of …show more content…
The moral habits which accompany moral virtue are a form of purification for the soul, which is achievable by choosing to live moderately, therefore being a parallel to the requirements of being in the proper sense. A moral habit is a habit of living within means a person’s capability, without living in severity of either extremes of restriction or indulgence. When such moderation is achieved, one can begin to practice moral practices. The proper sense of a human being relates to the issues of intellectual virtue as intellect gives a person his human character. A person living in the proper sense of moderation is capable of intellectual virtue because the mind and soul is no longer tainted with the effects of extremities and is able to be pure in his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill and Aristotle spent a lot of time defining and talking about happiness and how virtue can make one happy and also be a means to our end. According to Aristotle, virtue comes from practicing habit and good upbringing. In the society today, people think happiness is all about money and fame, but Aristotle believes that virtue is the one thing that can bring us happiness. According to Mill, he doesn’t agree that virtue is the end or rather the principal thing that makes us happy, rather Mill believes that pleasure is what brings happiness and also freedom from pain (Mill). He has a very different idea from Aristotle.…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Maimonides’ theologically-inspired interpretation of rule-utilitarianism draws in foundation from a precept he devotes much ink to settling the merits of: The True Law [the six hundred and thirteen commandments of the Torah] … give[s] us the twofold perfection. It aims first at the establishment of good mutual relations among men by removing injustice and creating the noblest feelings. In this way the people … stay and continue in one condition, and every one can acquire his first perfection [well-being of the body].…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1) With duty-based ethics it’s about obedience of law, performing an act morally because it’s out of duty. The act is based on the fact that it’s our obligation, we do the duty out of oughtness. Virtue ethics is different from duty-based ethics as one is not acting out of oughtness or duty, but out of motivation and feelings. Acting on moral character. Virtue ethics would be to perform an act for example out of love for a mother who is ill; you take care of her because of the love you have for her not because it your duty.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Hundert Ethics

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    From Greek times, many philosophies have been concerned about the nature of virtues and vices. A great moral philosopher, Aristotle one day said, "We are what we repeatedly do... excellence, therefore, isn't just an act, but a habit." Those are factors which define the personality or character of an individual. In every circumstance, the way a person naturally act determined his/her human quality, and life. As humans, we have the goal for achieve a good living and hence, happiness.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle proposes in his well renowned work, Nicomachean Ethics, a way of life that is structured on the foundation of what is happiness for human beings. Nicomachean Ethics provides the means in which are best determined to achieve the ultimate goal of an individual’s life which according to Aristotle is happiness. The definition of happiness is determined differently based on an individual’s perspective of the concept which the philosopher states in the beginning of Chapter Four in Book One of Nicomachean Ethics. Although differing in opinions and perspective of what happiness can best be defined as, there is a formal agreement of understanding amongst the people which Aristotle labels “the many and the refined” (Aristotle, Bartlett, & Collins,…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue Ethics (Individualism) and Care Ethics (Collectivism) Virtue ethics or Individualism is having the excellence of moral; righteousness, responsibility, and other exemplary qualities. Care ethics, or feminist theory, states that women and men have different ethical practices. However, no one person, man or woman, is better or superior to another.…

    • 1967 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Maimonides’ teaching on the problem of evil Moses Maimonides is a Jewish philosopher and doctor who was born in Cordoba. Maimonides showed his interest in philosophy and science in his early ages. Also, he studied the Jewish torah and many other philosophical books that were translated to Arabic. He was taught under the supervision of the Arabic and Jewish philosophers.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Explanations

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages

    a person’s standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. This essay intends point out the relevant aspects of moral theologians, Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held and to answer the question of the best suited approach in resolving ethical problems and dilemmas. Kant I have found that Kant’s theory is the most complicated and confusing of the four. It was only made somewhat clear by the explanation in O’Neill’s reading.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The following paper argues in favor of Aristotle’s virtue ethics over Kantian deontology. In Kantian deontology, to be ethical is to follow one’s duty by acting on only the rules which one can at the same time rationally will that those actions become universal laws, while in Aristotelian virtue ethics, to be ethical is to develop and internalize virtuous habits until one fully becomes virtuous themselves. In turn, the ethical question of ‘What should I do?’ that deontology asks becomes ‘What should I be?’ with virtue ethics, placing emphasis on internal motivations rather than external actions.…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “Letter to Menoeceus”, Epicurus argues that pleasure is the only essential good that people seek. He argues that pleasure is the only thing that people should pursue for its own sake. In this paper, I will make that the argument that pleasure or pain’s absence are not the only things worth pursuing for their own sake. Epicurus—a psychological hedonist—argues that “the end of all our actions is to be free of pain and fear” (Epicurus, par. 6). To summarize his argument, he states that pleasure is the ultimate result of all of our actions.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers such as Aristotle, The Buddha, and the more modern-day Nel Noddings have all begged the question, “What does it mean to live a good life?” Aristotle’s main view aims at happiness, and focus on the self. The Buddha and Nel Noddings both believe that one should not fully focus on the self, but more on the selfless acts for others. Each of these philosophers has determined their own proper way to lead a good life and I will examine each philosophy through comparison to the eldest, Aristotle. I believe Aristotle’s philosophy to be agreeable, but I feel he is missing certain key components which I will discuss by the end of the essay.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Can Virtue Be Taught Essay

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In my paper, I will argue that virtue can be taught to those who are willing to change. Although those who oppose the teaching of virtue believe that virtue is a born trait and is developed naturally through habits. There are many who believe that virtue is teachable and although there may be bad people, it is true that they…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant and Aristotle have similarities and differences when it comes to their ethical theories. Both men believed in logically understanding what was right and moral, but just in different ways. Kant mainly focused on Humans being ends rather than the means to achieving the happiest life possible. Aristotle focused on the “Golden Mean” between emotion and action. Using Sandal’s “Jumping the Queue” and “Markets in Life and Death”, Kant and Aristotle ‘s similarities and differences will become more evident.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Contrasting Plato’s theory of Dualism , Aristotle explains that the body and mind are one thing that cannot be separated. Aristotle claims that motion is eternal. Introducing us the idea of happiness, Aristotle questions what we do to make our life good or something that makes us be alive. He states that the psyche or soul part of our life like happiness consists a good life for humans.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral excellence signifies the quest of the God’s will in all life’s aspect. It is the evaluation of one’s action whether it is right or wrong. In the other hand, motivation represents as “the reasons underlying behavior.” (Guay et al. 2010. p. 712).…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays