Saved by the Naval Officer
Unlike every Nicholas Sparks book,not every book ends with a happily ever after and every problem resolved. In William Golding's book, Lord of the Flies, he left plenty of unresolved conflicts. By analyzing the last chapter of the book, he leaves the reader at a state of “What just happened?”, but also needing to hear why he ended it the book the way he did. Although it had enough details and made plenty of sense, the book's suspense level was at a maximum and he just ends it with one line.
William Golding,is a very descriptive writer throughout this book.By looking at the last chapter, one can see that the suspence level is very high then drops dramatically; this is important because Jack and his savages were trying to kill Ralph, but then Ralph runs into the naval officer so abruptly and is saved. Considering this it makes me wonder what would have happened in that moment if the officer did not show up? Although it was very relieving to know that the boys would be saved, it still bothers me. Especially because there is so much left unsaid and undone in just that scene.For example, Jack and his …show more content…
Like when the naval officer said "Nobody killed, I hope? Any dead bodies?" Ralph said there were only two people that were dead, when in reality there were three. Pondering upon the fact that there were in total three deaths with two openly confessed, leads to the thought of did the boys know that the boy with the mulberry birthmark had been dead that whole time. Undoubtedly, the boys had known that he was missing but did not make any actions to find him. In comparison, there were the obvious murders of both Simon, and Piggy that the boys have an automatic recognition of. In contrast the two murders were the easiest things to say outright where they could not confess the fact that a child was dead far in the
Unlike every Nicholas Sparks book,not every book ends with a happily ever after and every problem resolved. In William Golding's book, Lord of the Flies, he left plenty of unresolved conflicts. By analyzing the last chapter of the book, he leaves the reader at a state of “What just happened?”, but also needing to hear why he ended it the book the way he did. Although it had enough details and made plenty of sense, the book's suspense level was at a maximum and he just ends it with one line.
William Golding,is a very descriptive writer throughout this book.By looking at the last chapter, one can see that the suspence level is very high then drops dramatically; this is important because Jack and his savages were trying to kill Ralph, but then Ralph runs into the naval officer so abruptly and is saved. Considering this it makes me wonder what would have happened in that moment if the officer did not show up? Although it was very relieving to know that the boys would be saved, it still bothers me. Especially because there is so much left unsaid and undone in just that scene.For example, Jack and his …show more content…
Like when the naval officer said "Nobody killed, I hope? Any dead bodies?" Ralph said there were only two people that were dead, when in reality there were three. Pondering upon the fact that there were in total three deaths with two openly confessed, leads to the thought of did the boys know that the boy with the mulberry birthmark had been dead that whole time. Undoubtedly, the boys had known that he was missing but did not make any actions to find him. In comparison, there were the obvious murders of both Simon, and Piggy that the boys have an automatic recognition of. In contrast the two murders were the easiest things to say outright where they could not confess the fact that a child was dead far in the