Samsung Porter's Five Forces Analysis
In the mobile industry, tablet and laptop could be considered as the substitute products. However in case of laptop, it is not uncomfortable to carry in everyday life so most of people prefer tablet to use instead of smartphone. Samsung, Apple and Nokia produce tablet as well and Samsung and Apple have high sales number in the tablet industry. Unlike the sales number of smartphone in Table 1, Apple has the highest number of sales number among them in Table 3. Therefore it is suggested that Samsung needs to analyze the competitive product and invest to Research and Development to be successful in the tablet market as well. Even if the power of substitute is low within the mobile industry because companies which sell smart phone also produce the tablets, competitive of substitute with each mobile company is …show more content…
Porter, M.E. (2008). The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review. pp. 79-93.
3. Leachman, R, C., Kang, J. & Lin, V. (2002). SLIM: Short Cycle Time and Low Inventory in Manufacturing at Samsung Electronics. Interfaces, 32/1, pp. 61-77.
4. Poter, M.E. (1996). What is strategy?. Harvard Business Review, 74/6, pp. 61-78.
5. Nalebuff, B.J., & Brandenburger, A.M. (1997). Co-opetition: Competitive and cooperative business strategies for the digital economy. Strategy & Leadership, 25/6, pp. 28-35.
6. Mello, J.P (2012, October). Samsung, Apple phones lead sales while Nokia droops. Macworld. Retrieved from http://www.macworld.com.au/news/samsung-apple-phones-lead-sales-while-nokia-droops-77847/
7. Huvard, S., Salcedo, R., Tuppince, L., Wentz, M., & Zolad, L. (2006). Vodafone Air Touch: The Acquisition of Maanesmann: Virginia Commonwealth University. pp.1-29
8. Husso, M. (2011). Analysis of Competition in the Mobile Phone Markets of the United States and Europe. Alto University School of Economics, pp. 1-112
9. Baumgartner, H. & Steenkamp, J. B. (1996). Exploratory consumer buying behavior: Conceptualization and measurement, International Journal of Research in Marketing,