Hardwick 478 U.S. 186 (1986), which is a court case that denies the protection of constitutional privacy to gays and lesbians, and it is often cited when used by states that continue to criminalize homosexual sodomy. It set the foundation for states and the federal government to discriminate against homosexuals. States can recognize certain marriages, only because they want to, not because they have to. Sodomy laws are usually the most commonly used laws to discriminate against gays. They prohibit anal, sex and in some cases oral sex, by labeling them as criminal acts even though they are done in the privacy of their own homes. “However, all this changed in 2003, when the U.S. Supreme Court decided Lawrence and Garner v. Texas, a case in which two gay men were prosecuted under Texas’s anti-sodomy law. The Supreme Court overturned the conviction as well as the Texas sodomy law, deciding that sodomy laws violate the due process protection of the Unites States Constitution. Under this decision, state sodomy laws are no longer valid, even if they are still in the books.” (McWhorter Sember
Hardwick 478 U.S. 186 (1986), which is a court case that denies the protection of constitutional privacy to gays and lesbians, and it is often cited when used by states that continue to criminalize homosexual sodomy. It set the foundation for states and the federal government to discriminate against homosexuals. States can recognize certain marriages, only because they want to, not because they have to. Sodomy laws are usually the most commonly used laws to discriminate against gays. They prohibit anal, sex and in some cases oral sex, by labeling them as criminal acts even though they are done in the privacy of their own homes. “However, all this changed in 2003, when the U.S. Supreme Court decided Lawrence and Garner v. Texas, a case in which two gay men were prosecuted under Texas’s anti-sodomy law. The Supreme Court overturned the conviction as well as the Texas sodomy law, deciding that sodomy laws violate the due process protection of the Unites States Constitution. Under this decision, state sodomy laws are no longer valid, even if they are still in the books.” (McWhorter Sember