1.3 Objectives of the study
1.3.1 Major Objective
The general objective of the study is to analyse the implication of the decision in CEHURD&ThreeOthers v. Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 16 of 2011), on the realization of the right to health in Uganda.
1.3.2 Specific Objectives
i. To explore the legal and socio-economic imperatives that necessitate thejusticiability of the right to health in Ugandan. ii. To analyse the implications of the court ruling of the CEHURD case on the justiciability of right to health in Uganda. iii. To make recommendations on the ideal future of justiciability and jurisprudence of the right to health in Uganda.
1.4 Major Research questions
The study addresses three research questions namely:-
i. What is the legal and socio-economic imperative that necessitates the justiciability of the right to health in the Ugandan? ii. What is the CEHURD case decision impact on the justiciability of the right to health in Uganda? iii. What is the international understanding of the right to health as a human right in international law?
1.5 Scope of the