Obviously RFID’s invade privacy because they are easily coded that, if anyone has an RFID tag reader, all the stored
Obviously RFID’s invade privacy because they are easily coded that, if anyone has an RFID tag reader, all the stored
All of their privacy has been taken away. An example of this is when the fire chief explains the job of a beastly mechanical hound, "All of those chemical balances and percentages on all of us here in the house are recorded in the master file downstairs"(24). The mechanical hound is able to trace the chemical balances of humans, picking up how a person feels, and much more information. This is an invasion of privacy because nobody should be able to look at someone’s feelings, and use them for anything, such as finding guilt or innocence for a crime. All in all, privacy issues are rising at high…
Chip Card Nightmares Published in Wall Street Journal, Joanna Stern’s “Chip Card Nightmares, Help Is on The Way” (a) Swipe the card (b) get scold by the cashier to use the chip reader (c) insert the chip and cancel all foreseeable plans (d) wait, wait some more and celebrate once you hear that joyless “ remove your card” sound. I want you to remember that next time you experience, it’s not you. It’s the banks, credit card companies, merchants, payment processors, terminal Manufacturers and many others But there’s a ray of hope; your Smartphone.…
Seeing your every move tracking you down to a tee and your habit , how owuld you feel if all this information could eaasily be found out just by the goverment taking picture of your lincease plate? the two article above point out very different view points on tracking informationa nd taking pictures and storing other people lineanese plate number. Both article are clearly biased and have no real hard set truth to them, which is fine but leaves and big debate still on the table to look and and choose a side to be on. The first article is main against the concept of taking pictures of plates and using them to track people and get information due to the fact ofprivacy and has more supportive information witht the text. the second article seems a little bit far fetch really only focus on the point of the first admendment and not really expand much past that very opinionated.…
“Let’s stop calling them cellphones, call them trackers” (that’s no phone). With cellphones everywhere you go you can get tracked. If you get lost it can tell you exactly where you are at. Also if you leave your phone somewhere you can track your lost phone and find it where ever it’s at. This states how technology can track you…
Information privacy is the major issue in the current generation. People are more concerned about their convenience along with security. For example if the car breaks downs, one can push a button and the On-star operator will provide help by tracking the location of the car. This situation explains how conveniently one get the service immediately. On the other hand, we are not sure who is tracking our car location and is there any harm caused by that person.…
The Fourth Amendment is “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” The goal of this amendment is to protect people’s privacy. The Fourth Amendment protects the people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. However, the fourth amendment is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures.…
Police officers have needed the information on electronic devices. They need this data for finding missing citizens and suspects. But have been stopped in their tracks countless times. They have been stopped by the owners and others that believe the 4th Amendment enables them to decline the seizing and search of their devices. They want officers to have a warrant.…
With the advancement of technology comes a startling decrease in privacy. Nothing is considered ‘personal’ by the internet, or private, or kept a secret. Anything put on the internet is forever immortalized. Technology like cellphones, laptops, and drones have invaded the sense of personal privacy and eliminated the prospects of privacy returning to those who possess technology.…
*Texting and walking simulation* I am 17 years old I have had my licenses for over a year now, and haven’t gotten in any accidents. I became a little more risky, using my phone, looking away from the road more. I didn’t think that getting in an accident would ever happen to me, I thought I was a great driver. Until I cross the median into oncoming traffic with my friends in the car. I’m unconscious, I had to be pulled out of the wreckage.…
Having to live in control of Big Brother is like giving up your soul . I wouldn't be able to live in a era such as 1984 ,being on a raider at all times isn't my cup of tea. ‘’Privacy is not by controlling someone's life it's when you know you're finally free. Is privacy really a phone? Many people today have smartphones.…
Body cameras for me personally is not an issue. I was pulled over by a police officer with a body camera recently. It happened at a McDonalds around 11’o clock at night in my hometown Reading, PA. As I was leaving the drive thru and making a left out of McDonalds I hear and see red and blue lights behind me. I pull over and shortly he comes over and introduces himself and his body camera.…
Americans have long valued their constitutional rights, which ensure them a certain degree of independence and protection from mistreatment by the government. The fourth amendment ensures that citizens are not searched without reason or in an unlawful way--this guarantees that one’s person or property is not searched without a warrant or probable cause. When it comes to technology, however, the line begins to blur. The exponential growth of technology within the 21st century alongside the growing threat of terrorism has led the government to conduct surveillance and searches through technology. Laws and acts such as the USA PATRIOT act have granted the government increasingly more freedom to gather information through technology.…
"None of our Business?" by Roberta Fusaro Raydar Electronics is a technology firm which makes radio frequency identification tags and readers. This article describes the use of RFIDs and where they are placed, what their intended purpose is, and why it has stirred commotion to people. Dante Sorella, a CEO of a technology firm informs the readers of some presentations that were given as well. One quick example of this that places such as the US military which have been experimenting with RFIDs on tires for vehicles they use. Further into the article, Marketing director at KoolKids incorporated Carol Sullivan and the CEO of KK Craig Davis took an interest in Raydar to know what is going in and out of the warehouse.…
Why are we so worried about being watch? It’s not like you’re doing anything wrong, right? Surveillance is a very talked about topic as of the present day. Should the government or any funded entity have the ability to watch us? Ask yourself this, are you doing anything wrong.…