Reoccurring Concepts In The Meditations Of Marcus Aurelius

Improved Essays
After skimming through The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius, he tells readers about his stoicism by repeating several principal concepts. Three of the most reoccurring principal concepts are: keeping your mind calm and serene, you shouldn’t hate or be vengeful towards anyone, and don’t worry about dying. The meaning of one of the most reoccurring concepts, keeping your mind calm and serene, is to stay calm and don't focus on things that don’t regard you. The concept of not being hateful and vengeful means that you shouldn’t despise a person even if they are sinful people because you also have faults. Don’t worry about dying is one of the most reoccurring concepts and it means to not fear death because it’s inevitable and it won’t be painful.After

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the poem, "From the Dao de jing", the pictures in this poem pass on the possibility of the Dao as a unity of opposites are the: bowls, carts, windows and doors. Every one of these pictures demonstrate its immense and puzzling inventive potential. "A clay bowl is molded; but the use of the bowl will depend on the part of the bowl that is void (jing line 7). " The items that are made are relying upon the part that is void. The void speaks to an entire hollow space where potential "usefulness rises.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marcus Aurelius was considered the last of the “Five Good Emperors”. Marcus Aurelius was born on April 26, 121 AD, in Rome, Italy. He was known for his philosophical interests and was one of the most respected emperors. He was born into a wealthy and influential family. He learned Latin and Greek.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marcus Aurelius Arguments

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Marcus Aurelius, emperor of Roman empire was a great philosopher he wrote poweful passages. In his meditations he comes off strong and stright forward. Many people might disagree with him and call him harsh and some might even say he makes them feel bad about themsealves, but others like myself might think he changed and battered the way thinking forever. Marcus was a stoic philosopher who dealt with emotional intelligence, mind over matter, nature, etc. One if marcus arguments in the beginning of book 5 was about getting out of bed in then morning.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I believe that both Socrates and Lucretius have good arguments on how to be afraid of death. They have some similarities, but they have many contradictories within each of each other 's arguments. The thought in different ways are not from similar time periods. Although, both did agree on that death is a part of life and once you’re gone, you are gone and feel no…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marcus Aurelius was born on April 16 121, in Rome, Italy. Marcus was then one of the most respected emperors in Roman history. When Marcus was growing up he was a very dedicated student. His dad died 124 AD. At the age of 17, Marcus Aurelius finally because the son of antonines.…

    • 70 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nations today strive to resemble the Roman Empire. The commonwealth not only completed marvelous engineering feats, but also developed a system of government that allowed for prosperity among its citizens. This was mainly possible because of influential leaders that steered the empire. The first ruler, Augustus, was a merciless rebel early in his career, but soon became an astute general by winning numerous wars and uniting the people in his empire. After more than a century of Augustus’s reign, Marcus Aurelius championed the highest seat in Roman society.…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The most profound intellectual monarch in western civilization governed the greatest influential empire in history, the Holy Roman Empire. Marcus Aurelius Antoninus was born on April 4th, 121 AD into a high Roman society family. By the age of six, he was brought to the attention of Emperor Hadrian, who immediately foresaw a promising future in him, and took it upon himself to personally train him as an Equestrian and offer him the finest education possible (Bunson 261). Bunson believes that “Hadrian had the foresight to make Marcus a part of his plan for the long-range stability of the Empire” (261). In order to carry out his plan, Emperor Hadrian arranged the marriage of Marcus Antonius to his appointed heir’s daughter Annia Galeria Faustina.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stoicism is the source of moral behavior that appears the most in these sources and is justified with promises of intangible rewards. For the first source, “Enchiridion”, Epictetus states that “stoic philosophy… must direct one’s way of life” (70). Romans are supposed to approach moral behavior by living life as “though [they’re] a guest at a dinner party” (71). Dinner party guests are supposed to act modest and wait for food to come their way, just like in life with regard to wealth and public honors. Epictetus also says to act as if they “are an actor in a drama, in a role chosen [for them] by the Author” (71).…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Epictetus Book Analysis

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the second half of this semester, the Handbook of Epictetus and the Sun Tzu’s the art of war are the two book that were meaningful to me. The Handbook of Epictetus not only shows me the stoic philosopher’s thinking process but also teaches me how to manage my negative emotions, how to find the inner peace of my life, and how to cherish the thing that is in front of me. And for the first time, I realized that the philosophy thinkings could be implemented to and thus help to improve my daily life. In the hand book, Epictetus states that “What upsets people is not things themselves but their judgments about the things.”…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the first meditation, Decartes got rid of all of the ideas that he even had the slightest doubt about. This confuses him even more. Nevertheless, he wants to continue his path of meditation to find anything that he can be absolutely certain about or until he is certain that nothing is certain. He hopes to achieve great things if he can find just one thing to be certain. Therefore, his initial perspective on everything is to be untrue.…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stoic vs Aristotle I believe that Aristotle would disagree with the two Stoic teachings discussed on the handout. The first Stoic teaching mentioned in the handout deals with virtue and vice. The teaching states that virtue is the only true good and vice the only true evil. The first teaching also states that things such as money, pleasure, pain, hunger, food, etc. are neutral, and are to be treated with indifference.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lucretius and Epicureanism believes in freedom and free will. If we are released from all fears, for example, the gods and death, and just analyze life we are being lead to a life of happiness. For many people, they a fearful of death, but "death is nothing to us and no concern of ours, since the nature of the mind is now held to be mortal" (Lucretius 45). This means that we should not fear death because we have no conscious when we are dead. This case is very similar to before we were born.…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ main goal with his first meditation is to provide a new foundation of the sciences. He claims that the foundation of the sciences lies within our minds and is exclusive of our senses. To prove this theory, Descartes uses the method of logical doubt, in which he states “if I am able to find in each one some reason to doubt, this will suffice to justify my rejecting the whole” (Descartes, 6). This means that, if he can find the slightest doubt regarding a fact, he can therefore can conclude that it is not true. However, Descartes does not reject every single aspect, but rather the basic foundations.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Socrates’ words, “You are wrong sir, if you think that a man who is any good at all should take into account the risk of life or death; he should look to this only in his actions, whether what he does is right or wrong, whether he is acting like a good or a bad man.” (28b) For a man who has lived honorably according to Socrates should not even take into account fearing death if they are truly good. If they are performing actions that deem them good, they should not think of death as the “greatest of evils” as Socrates calls it. Socrates states, “To fear death, gentlemen, is no other than to think oneself wise when one is not, to think one knows what one does not know” (29b)…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Similarly, some sections Socrates’s case on the fear of death dwell on personal opinions of the philosopher. Subsequently, for an argument to remain sound and valid, all the section of the idea should be based on facts and logic as opposed to the personal opinions that do not have a rational basis. Even so, the formal and quantitative way of measuring the fear of death, the grandest blessing as death, as well as the good or evil associated with death does not exist. In the same way, no parameter is available to ascertain the measurement to prove or disapprove faith from the perspective of embracing death while not fearing the unknown. As Socrates purports in his argument not to fear death, the way of thinking and his opinion would not aid in confronting his mortality.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays