Relativism Vs Christianity Essay

Improved Essays
Relativism vs Christianity Relativism shuns the notion of absolute truth. Because there is no absolute truth, anything and everything is true or not true only to those who choose to believe or disbelieve it. In other words “truth may be true for one but not for another since everyone has different interpretations based on different human conditions” (Christian Part one 6). This creates problems because if everything is relative, then so are morals. The morals of relativism are severely warped. Anything goes because anyone who follows relativism can justify their actions by saying they believe it was right. If truth is relative and not absolute in any area then how can the bible be true (Christian Part one 6)? Relativist are hard to share the gospel with, they do not want to believe in anything foundationally true. By being relative, they can live life by their own standards. They have no one to answer to but themselves, they suppress the truth in order to avoid guilt and responsibility, “mankind suppresses the truth in …show more content…
For one it does not confirm or deny the existence of God because he either could or could not exist depending on the person’s relative belief. Because of this it is extremely hard to witness to them because their response will inevitably be along the line of that God is true to you but not to them. Relativism and Christianity are exact opposites. Christianity believes in absolute truth. For example in John 18:37 Christ says “I am the way, the truth, and the life” (NIV). The Bible is God’s word and is an absolute truth because it is God breathed (Christian Part two 55) but how can we convince a relativist of that when absolute truth to them is non-existent? Christian morals are strictly bound to the commandments in the bible. The Ten Commandments are a second absolute truth in Christian minds and view, but the morals of relativism undermine these by simply saying “well those are true for

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism: Christianity vs. Voodoo The way we view different cultures can determine our own sense of belonging in our own cultural groups. Ethnocentrism and cultural relativism are the two main ways to compare cultures. Neither one is better than the other, there are benefits to each. After defining these terms, Christianity and Voodoo will be compared using these methods.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical relativism has been looked at from several different angles by many different people. Louis P. Pojman is one person that has not only questioned, but rejected the concept. Pojman’s argument stands on four objections. His protests are that ethical relativism leads to ridiculous outcomes, gives way to subjectivism, is logically inconsistent, and provides no rational method to resolve conflicts within and between cultures. Pojman theorized that, if the world were to go by ethical relativism, one could no longer make judgements against any society, including their own, because no external or objective truth exists.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I believe that it is common sense to disagree with moral relativism solely on the fact that it accepts racism, genocide of groups, even murder, as justifiable as long as that is what the group values to be right or acceptable. Having the beliefs of a moral relativist, you could go so far as to say that a group or culture could decide that starting a nuclear war was morally just, and that we as people outside of that group could not criticize those people for their actions. If ethical relativism is to be completely true, there can be no common ground for resolving moral disputes or for reaching an agreement on moral matters between members of different cultures. When it comes to justifying moral relativism, there is no decision procedure that can demonstrate the objective truth or falsity of moral judgments. On the contrary, moral objectivism, also known as moral absolutism, encompasses ethical theories that support the objectivity of moral values and norms.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sacrifice In Aztec Culture

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On the subject of ethical relativism, Ruth Benedict believes that cultural relativism and ethical relativism do not interfere with each other, also moral principles does not derive from cultural acceptance, furthermore, there are universal moral codes based on common aspects. (Vice and Virtue) While I do agree that there a set of moral standards that does not differ much from others, nevertheless,…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral relativism- The idea of moral relativism is one that morality is relevant to your situation, and that you should be accepting other people's morals and cultures. Moral relativism can first be seen in the colonies, mainly by the quakers in pennsylvania, and quakers were also vehemently against slavery, which was another morally relativistic idea. Moral absolutism- The idea that there is a clear right and wrong and that right and wrong is the same for every situation, and the idea has had many impacts on historical events in us history.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. According to Hauser what are the main challenges to the faith today? What is relativism and why does relativism undermine the faith? How does relativism affect higher education?…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I chose that I am a relativist because I believe that everyone’s moral principle is relative to the person who holds it. Everyone has their own opinion on what is permissible and what is not permissible. Everyone’s moral code can be different than society, for prime example, some people believe that everyone should be treated equally, and some do not. We as individuals cannot say that everyone’s moral value or cultural practice is objectively right or wrong. I am exactly like this, everyone has their own opinion, practices and beliefs, we cannot use our standards to judge another’s morality it is just ethically wrong.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism can be subjective, which is the view that an action is morally right if one approves of it or it can be cultural, the view that an action is right if one’s culture approves of it. As long as a person has approval for an action it will be considered the right action for them to make. Not every relativist is going to have morally correct beliefs because what seems right to one person may seem wrong to another. For example, some cultures believe that there is nothing wrong with committing crimes such as murder, rape, stealing because this is what is accepted and seen as normal in their culture. When looking at criterion 1 of moral criteria of adequacy, this theory appears to be inconsistent with considered judgments because what one person approves of can be seen as immorally incorrect.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism Essay

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although this concept isn’t great for our society, it has a greater success outcome compared to absolutism. In Mary Midgley’s article, she discusses the issues with moral relativism. She claims that although moral relativism doesn’t have the greatest outcome, it is a way to view different cultures. Every culture does something based on their religion and or…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism And Culture

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Different cultures have different moral codes”, James Rachels discusses in his article Why Morality Is Not Relative? (160). Moral codes differ from culture to culture and each culture tends to have their own individual standards. Cultural relativism is said to be “moral rules differ from society to society” (18). Cultural relativism can be looked at as a theory based on nature of morality. Each culture has their own moral codes, typically created by their ancestors.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, with an example like this, this is why moral realism makes the most sense. After researching moral realism and moral relativism further they are both standpoints in which I understand and was able to grasp a fundamental understanding of the two. Moral realism is judgments based on factual information and is basically true or false. Moral relativism is basically a claim and…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perfect Map Of A City

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. Discuss Activities 1.1(2), 1.2(1), 1.3, 1.4 Activity 1.1: Do you think it would be possible to make a perfect map of a city? What would such a map have to look like? How useful would it be? Making a perfect map of a city wouldn't be possible because it is impossible to make a perfect detailed replica of what a city looks like while also scaling it down.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural relativism may be defined as a theory that advocates the idea of subjective morality. To extrapolate, this theory entails that “different cultures have differing moral codes” and these variances are merely arbitrary. Although this is a seemingly sufficient theory, there are key issues with this school of thought. James Rachels suggests several issues with accepting cultural relativism. He criticizes cultural relativism by stating that the theory is absurd as it entails severe consequences if practiced.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism vs. Objectivism There are two different theories dealing with morality, what is right or wrong, and what is good or bad. The theories discussed will be, ethical relativism and ethical objectivism. Ethical relativism is defined as having no absolute stance on a position; there is no right or wrong. Ethical objectivism which claims that some moral rules really are correct. What would it mean for ethics if there were no absolutes?…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy paper on relativism and weather I agree or disagree In the following paper I will be discussing relativism, more specifically cultural and ethical relativism and weather I agree or disagree with that philosophy. Cultural revisits state that “no particular moral or ethical position can actually be considered “right” or “wrong.” Ethical relativism states that …”whether an action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced”. I agree with ethical and cultural relativism because there is no right or wrong moral code because people and societies have different beliefs.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays