The Red Spill And The Blue Pill By Nagel

Superior Essays
Nagel brings up fascinating questions in his book, “What does it all mean?” Do we live in the real world? Is the real world only as real as we perceive it to be? What is the meaning of life? First, we will explore our perceptions of the ‘real’ world and try to answer if that world is truly there or in our minds. Secondly, let’s say the world is real and everyone else in it, when we think about the question of the mind and the brain; did we have that thought in our brain? Or was it in our souls? Finally, we look at the most important question, what is the meaning of it all? His book is an invitation to explore the unknown, and in doing so, to arouse our curiosity and attempt to find the answers ourselves. The Red Pill or the Blue Pill?
Is this
…show more content…
I personally am a dualist, however the dual aspect theory is appealing to me. Its similar in the way Nagel describes them both, though he explicitly explains dual aspect theory as it taking place in the mind only. Dualism does not very much explain if our souls are in our bodies. I suppose you could assume it is since we (or perhaps just I) feel our ‘thoughts’ are originating in our
‘minds’ or bodies.
Physicalism says that ones mind or consciousness is no different from the physical system of the brain. Nagel explains, what limits us are our inability to understand what functions in the brain create the mind or consciousness.
…show more content…
So, what happens when one of the five senses are removed from a human being? The only conclusion is the electrochemical
‘map’ of our brain is forever altered in a way that leaves something lacking.
Now, let’s take it further and remove one, two, three, and the last remaining sense. This brain should no longer be receiving any physical stimuli, however, the thought, “I exist” comes ‘through’. This thought of continued existence came even though that brain is stripped of any senses to interpret the external world. It is in a void, dark, abyss. Since this hypothetical human has no way of knowing what is happening around them, how then does it know they exist? The brain has nothing to interpret. It can only be concluded then that the mind is not apart of the physical systems or functions of the brain, but is in many ways disconnected from it. We can then see the possibility of dualism and the dual aspect theory. But, even as the thought, “I exist” crosses the mind,
Nagel’s next question has us wonder, does our existence matter?
Live Long and Prosper, But to What

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Other Wes Moore Legacy

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Ever since the beginning of mankind, humans have pondered the purpose of their existence. Throughout history, a variety of philosophers, as well as authors, have asserted what they think to be the meaning of life. Philippe Petit’s To Reach the Clouds: My High Wire Walk Between the Twin Towers, Colum McCann’s Let the Great World Spin, and Wes Moore’s The Other Wes Moore: One Name, Two Fates all offer a unique outlook on the age old question of human existence.…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A. Exploring the Unconscious i. Freud used free association, in which he told the patient to relax and say whatever came to mind. ii. Called his treatment techniques psychoanalysis iii. Beneath our awareness is the larger unconscious mind with its thoughts, wishes, feelings, and memories. 1.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This belief the mind and the brain are related to each other as two distinct sorts of properties. The mind is believed to emerges from the brain but it is not dependent upon it. One could visualize this ideology as the brain as a snow cloud and the mind the unique, independent snowflakes that fall from it. The mind is seen as something spiritual and the body is physical. Since the mind comes from the brain; the brain contains both physical and spiritual properties (Mohn, 2017).…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From there, Andy uses knowing himself as an example. . . . if you want to get to know what I’m really like, you could buy and read my books. . . . But there’s an even better way: you could ask those who know me, or get to know me personally yourself.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jp36884, Junseong Park Response Berkeley 's Idealism In his book, Principles of Human Knowledge, Berkeley, in Principles: part 1, replies to the claim that, 'all that is real and substantial is banished out of the world. ' He first responds to this by saying, “...instead thereof a chimerical scheme of ideas takes place.” What he is saying here is that idealism does not just banish all out of existence, instead, it replaces all that exists with ideas of those particular things in the outside world. Berkeley writes, “all things that exist, exist only in the mind, that is, they are purely notional...…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Response to Question 1, Section 1: The Meaning of Life: Wolf vs. Taylor Both Richard Taylor and Susan Wolf understand the difficulty of answering the question, “What is the meaning of life?” Taylor begins his “The Meaning of Life” by saying that we do not even understand what the question means to then answer it, and Wolf claims in her own “The Meanings of Lives” that the question is embarrassing to ask because, as Taylor asserts, we really do not understand what is being asked here. Taylor proposes, then, the best way to answer this is to ask what makes for a meaningless life, and perhaps from this comparison, we can find some answers to the original question. Wolf appreciates Taylor’s approach as she also adopts his method, and even though…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cartesian Dualism

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Are mind and body essentially different? [Descartes, Conway, Cavendish] In 17th century philosophy, the mind-body issue surfaced many circulating viewpoints as to what the real relationship between the mind and the physical world is. This continuing dilemma brings up questions that have ongoing answers regarding if the mind and body are two substances or not, and how exactly the mind and body are related to each other. I am choosing to take a monist standpoint in this paper, expressing that the mind and body are in fact one substance and are not inherently different: matter cannot be infinitely divisible, there is no source of activity in the nature of matter being extended, and other body parts besides the mind have knowledge.…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In their work, The Extended Mind, Andy Clark and David Chalmers present the extended mind hypothesis to argue against the idea of the mind consisting solely of inputs and outputs. The hypothesis argues that the mind is not simply an internal thing, but rather that it can exist externally and be part of an individual’s environment. Clark and Chalmers argue for this this by presenting the examples of Otto, a man whose memories and knowledge lie in a notebook, and Inga someone who stores all the information in her mental states. I will argue that the extended mind hypothesis is unsuccessful because there is no clear line of what is actually known and what is only thought to be known. The extended mind hypothesis is the argument that…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the paper, ‘The Extended Mind’, authors Andy Clark and David J. Chalmers put forth the notion of “extended cognition”, which is the idea that the process of acquiring knowledge can extend outside of one’s own physical body. At the center of Clark and Chalmers argument is an analogy between two different individuals, Inga and Otto. Inga’s cognitive process takes place inside of her brain. Otto’s cognitive process includes phenomena external to his physical body. Specifically, it includes a notebook.…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I argue that substance dualism is true. Substance dualism claims that people and bodies are distinct. People, such as you and I, are nonphysical beings. We are connected human bodies, but we are not bodies. The reason is that (1) If we can exist without bodies, then we cannot be bodies.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In philosophy, a theory that includes the viewing of the the mind and body as being separate kinds of substances or natures is known as mind- body dualism. This stance implies that the mind and body not only differ in meaning but refer to different kinds of entities. Thus, a person that proposes the concept of dualism would oppose any theory that identifies mind with the brain, conceived as a physical operant. Descartes reaches this conclusion by arguing that the nature of the mind is completely and utterly distinct from that of the body, and therefore it is possible for one to exist without the other. This argument gives rise to the famous problem of mind-body causal interaction that are still commonly debated today: how can the mind cause…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This Dualist idea presents the Mind and Body as separate things made of separate stuff. The Body is external and public whereas the Mind is internal and private. This view pushes that the Mind and Body are still connected, however, explaining that what the Mind wills the Body does. The Doctrine justifies this connection by explaining two separate…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dualism Vs Physicalism

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The view of physicalism gives a stronger and more plausible answer to the mind-body problem. There are several reasons why this particular view gives a more sensible for answer to the problem at hand. These reasons include the rationale behind the reasoning of brain research, how the different aspects of reductive physicalism is able to address the non-physical aspects of the mind, as well as the less than sensible claims that the opposing view, dualism, presents in comparison. One of the main reasons why physicalism is able to prove itself to be the better answer to the mind-body problem is based off of research that society has learned about on the brain.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The argument in Descartes’ Sixth Meditation for the real distinction between the mind and the body ultimately secures his dualist position. Despite his argument appearing to make some mildly questionable leaps and seemingly ignore one potentially devastating point altogether, his position is clear and strong. I will begin by reconstructing Descartes’ argument, cover the grievances listed above, and then hope to argue that, despite these objections, Descartes’ position remains a sound metaphysical view. In the Sixth Meditation, Descartes begins by declaring that, firstly, all things one can clearly and distinctly perceive can be created by God, and secondly, if one can clearly and distinctly perceive one thing without calling to mind another,…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the movie I, Robot we are introduced to a long debated philosophical question: “What makes a human being human?”. Is the essence of mankind the fact that we are biologically unique among the myriad of different species on this planet? Is it the fact that we seem to have transcended our baser needs in order to try and make the world fit us as opposed to us fitting into the world around us? Is it perhaps that we have what people would call a “soul”? Or is it possibly that we were said to have either evolved from our animal counterparts, the primates, in order to be what we consider better?…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays