On June the 23rd 2016 a historic moment happened for Britain, the EU and even the world. It was announced that Britain had voted to leave the European Union. With this came lot of uncertainty for the future of the countries and organizations involved. However, for some it was viewed with great happiness and the building blocks to making Britain great again. Britain is still deciding how, when and even if they will leave, with multiple options ahead of them. The future implications or benefits are still yet to be seen, but many are predicting Britain will regret leaving.
The European Union as a committee of 28 European countries. It started of small with only 6 countries but has grown with stature. The main purpose of the EU is to help the member …show more content…
David Cameron the ex-prime-minister of England continued during the campaign to state the case on why to stay in the EU. He has stated that even though Britain’s economic growth is slow that it isn’t because of the EU. And that it helps British business’s as they can export products overseas to other EU countries with no taxes. When Britain’s growth is even lower that being part of the EU will help stabilize this and create a safety barrier. He has also done the complete opposite of Farage’s argument on immigrants. Saying that they actually stimulate economy and make it easier for businesses to operate cheaply. Also saying that they contribute to government services through the tax and that they don’t limit the services. Cameron argued that it would harm Britain’s status and that Britain is secure as part of a 28 country alliance if anything goes wrong. Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt eluded that if Britain left, public health schemes like NHS would get cuts. With also lots of skilled doctors and surgeons having to leave the country because they don’t have citizenship. Along with Cameron lots of leaders of other countries like Barack Obama supported Britain staying. These arguments are quite similar to the leave campaigning as they both seem to label issues like immigration completely opposite to the
The European Union as a committee of 28 European countries. It started of small with only 6 countries but has grown with stature. The main purpose of the EU is to help the member …show more content…
David Cameron the ex-prime-minister of England continued during the campaign to state the case on why to stay in the EU. He has stated that even though Britain’s economic growth is slow that it isn’t because of the EU. And that it helps British business’s as they can export products overseas to other EU countries with no taxes. When Britain’s growth is even lower that being part of the EU will help stabilize this and create a safety barrier. He has also done the complete opposite of Farage’s argument on immigrants. Saying that they actually stimulate economy and make it easier for businesses to operate cheaply. Also saying that they contribute to government services through the tax and that they don’t limit the services. Cameron argued that it would harm Britain’s status and that Britain is secure as part of a 28 country alliance if anything goes wrong. Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt eluded that if Britain left, public health schemes like NHS would get cuts. With also lots of skilled doctors and surgeons having to leave the country because they don’t have citizenship. Along with Cameron lots of leaders of other countries like Barack Obama supported Britain staying. These arguments are quite similar to the leave campaigning as they both seem to label issues like immigration completely opposite to the