Public And Private Sectors Have Converged Since 1979

Superior Essays
Outline why it is sometimes argued that the public and private sectors have converged since 1979 and consider to what extent you agree that this is the case
Since 1979, there has been a global shift in the provision of public services, from solely public sector, to a greater involvement of the private sector. Until just over thirty years ago, the public sector was to abide by strict rules and codes of conduct with regards to management, known as Public Administration. However, it was recognised by some that this traditional, possibly out-dated style, proved particularly ineffective and inefficient and so from the mid to late 70’s, a new, more ‘managerial’ approach was brought about, which was heavily influenced by the private sector management techniques. This new approach was known and referred to as New Public Management, and there were a number of factors which initiated this change, of which included
…show more content…
NPM was result of anti-public sector promotions. Jackson said 2 things gave rise to NPM, the first being the libertarian ideology (laissez-faire, power to the people .. Thatcher) and the second being the Left ideas and peoples demand for the providers of public services to be held more accountable. Therefore, NPM characteristics included a higher focus on output as opposed to being too heavily focused on administering input, i.e concentration on performance. Highlights competition for customer choice, privatization and contracting out. All in all, this basically meant a shift from Public Administration to Management. Owen E Hughes highlights the significance of this change by stating “a new model of public management has taken over and will totally change the way the public sector

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Financial deregulation transformed the character of the thrift industry” (Sherman 8). The thrift crisis cost a total of $210 Billion (Sherman 9) to the taxpayers and foreshadowed the Financial Crisis of 2007-08, as both crises shared a period --prior to the collapse-- of financial deregulation followed by rapid growth and an eventual collapse. The thrift crisis was a warning sign to those who endorsed the financial deregulation that followed, but the warning was not heeded. Matthew Sherman argues that financial deregulation continued into the 1990’s. Unlike the deregulation of the 1980’s, which favored the thrift industry, the deregulation of 1990’s favored the commercial banking and investment banking industries.…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What incited Roy to try and combine philosophy and politics? The main objective of this essay is to understand why Roy chose to abandon communism and become critical of it, while adopting a more philosophical stance as a radical humanist. The history of the world dictates that communism was an ideology that came into being to safeguard the interests of the working class and most importantly, prevent them from being exploited by their employers. This was the main motivation of the German economist Karl Marx. However Marx 's works were scrutinized and adopted to develop a political ideology which seemed very lucrative and also very different from the established order.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Role Of Political Parties

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages

    All focus should be set on making the economy more efficient, creating jobs, education, and the prosperity of the nation. Some flaws in the constitution such as the exclusion of women have further destructed freedom but there has been a decrease of this in recent years. Violence and nativism are major destructors of freedom in many democracies in the world today. I believe that if the government were less centralized, the peoples a whole would have more individual power and would be more in control of the processes in the government. Working toward a even less centralized nation would create a heavy democratic system since the democratic party is looked at as “for the people”.…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To fix this economic discrepancy and to bring the middle class back into the competitive economic markets of the world, there will have to be political policies created to remove countries from globalist trade deals like NAFTA or TPP. Ross Perot 's stated in 1992 “NAFTA would make a giant sucking sound by drawing jobs out of the United States (Garrett 201)” so, leaving those agreements would…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Progressives were dissatisfied with the social and economic vices they saw among the upper and working classes; they believed that in order to protect and maintain their own virtuous family lives, they needed to reform the vices of the other classes. In a total rejection of negative liberty ideals, progressives argued that “individualism means tyranny” and that societies cannot prevail which “endure on a purely individualistic basis” (McGerr 158). The Progressives quickly gained enough political influence to pass a series of reforms involving prohibition, education, labor law, and economic law. But in doing so, they set aside the long held American belief in self-determination and freedom from coercion, favoring instead the ideals of positive liberty, which is defined by the idea that a person will ultimately be more free if they make better choices (Madsen 119). The idea behind the Progressive Reformation was that by allowing the government to regulate some choices, the people would ultimately have more choices and abilities in the long run.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “We know that the present State is not “society” representing the “rising working class.” It is itself the representative of capitalist society. It is a class state.” Those words ring very true, especially in America. The Government in The United States can be clearly seen being in favor of those who have the money, and that is because those people are the ones who give them the funding to get elected. By rigging the system, which should be by the people, for the people, to be in favor of those already in power they take the power away from the working class people. Luxemberg believes in the ability to make gradual social reforms is the way to work towards socialism is a viable and legitimate alternative to revolution if it is done correctly.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In conclusion, I consider that each time and change in human life, as the Mechanical revolution Europe experienced during the latest of 19th century and the beginning of 20th century, led to changes in society. In my opinion art is a way in which this changes are internalized and preserved. Cubism was the internalization of the Modern process, as I said before it was Modernism by itself since it really became part of the transformations of that time. I really consider Cubist painters knew how to create and establish a new way of art, which represented the changes if the time they lived in. I found interesting writing this essay since it helped me to better understand Cubism, what it means and the social matters that contributed to its…

    • 1935 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Harvey asserts that neoliberalism and the neoliberal idea of freedom were not a simple utopian project of intellectuals but rather a political project that helps elites to regain the power they somehow lost in the regulated. Therefore, the meaning and importance they devoted to liberty as a conceptual apparatus helped them to construct the consent of the society for the changes they asked for. Hayek, with referring Polanyi, claims that freedom is not a good thing necessarily. There are good and bad freedoms and neoliberal thinking made bad ones superior to good ones for the sake of capitalists. And in most of the advanced capitalist societies, the meaning freedom is what neoliberalism gave it nowadays.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Weber contrasts to Marx by concentrating on status and rationalisation, believing that Marxism meant that the state had too much control and it potentially could lead to loss of freedoms for the individual. Rationalisation (or motivation capitalism) was a means to increase profit which Weber linked back to the development of a rationalised bureaucratised centralised state (Ritzer, 2011, p. 130). Foucault on the other hand argues that power is predominant through our social system, in particular, technologies that he saw silently controlling and manipulating the masses such as prisons and medicine (Gerrie, 2003). Not only that, but Foucault also noted that power is instantiated by rules set and governed by society, the politics of the use of language, and…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is not always possible to vote out a government every time a population disagrees with it. It is in these times of disagreement where it is up to the people to step up in protest. It becomes further justified when a government is not only incompetent, but when it actively oppresses its people from exercising their rights. This is where revolutionary thinkers like Karl Marx and Slavoj Zizek are important. Marx, for example, believed that the best way to re-balance society was through the ballot box.…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays