The job security is an additional concern. Since most employees are “at-will”, which means they can quit their jobs or get fires with or without reason at any time. The public sector can’t fire, demote, or discipline workers at least there is a reason or a misdemeanor. For instance, the government employees need to present reasons for firing, while privet sector workers won’t have the reason. The private employer can take actions and discipline workers. These employees won’t have representation or support. The public workers will have support and representation from the union who support employees’ rights. Sometimes paying dues for union membership is worth it because people get more job security and support. During the bargaining, the public employees will have an open negotiation, which can highlight TV news, the private sector’s negotiations might not even exist. The authority to commit the collective bargaining agreement can be shared by the executive and legislative branches, and sometimes three parties will involve in the negotiation. The privet sector negotiation usually includes a key player, like an owner who is a solo decision …show more content…
In fact, according to statistics, the salaries and benefits of the government employees are much higher than private-sector workers. Even though there are many positive aspects of the public sector, some negative factors exist. Unions represent a force that can provide political support. For example, some officials will use their power and maintain the payroll more government employees just to get support. Some rules require many states to have collective bargaining for public employees. In fact, there is evidence when local governments were forced to find ways how to cut costs, but continuing to provide